|
Edited on Tue Feb-14-06 02:24 PM by Mayberry Machiavelli
(some opinions herein, take it as you will this is not being stated as fact, but just a "translation" of what was seen on TV)
Verified, from the news conference:
1. The man has had a heart attack, or myocardial infarction. This means that part of the tissue of the heart has died. This is detected either through blood tests showing that enzymes from heart muscle have been released into the blood from dying tissue, and/or EKG readings.
2. The man went into atrial fibrillation, an irregular heartbeat.
3. The man had a cardiac catheterization, presumably to diagnose if a blockage in the coronary arteries caused either or both 1 & 2. According to the conference, the results of the catheterization were unremarkable.
4. From all of the above it sounds like the cause of the myocardial infarction, or MI, was most likely direct injury to the heart tissue from birdshot trauma.
5. At least one or more pieces of shot were lodged either in the muscle of the heart, or immediately at its surface, causing inflammation and irritability, leading to the atrial fibrillation (AF).
Things that were not specifically said, or were said in an ambiguous way but but can be reasonably inferred from the doctor/hospital news conference:
A. It sounds like this guy had a penetrating chest wound from the beginning. Meaning, the birdshot probably penetrated beyond the skin, fat, and muscle into the chest cavity with the original shot. Shot, bullets, do migrate over time. But it seem pretty unlikely in 2-3 days time that it would go from the skin or fat, through the muscle layers and into the chest cavity where the heart resides. Likely there was penetrating trauma to the chest cavity with the initial injury though this was not stated.
B. This means that the initial injury was likely life threatening, even if the guy looked fine. Where this guy was shot, the potential for massive blood loss from major blood vessels in the chest and near the heart was high. The major blood vessels of the body enter and leave the heart within the space where the shot injured the heart. Even if bleeding did not occur, just from the chest cavity being penetrated, even by small shot, a pneumothorax can occur, a collapse of a lung, which in the most extreme cases can lead to cardiac arrest and death even in the absence of ANY blood loss, due to a buildup of air pressure in the chest. ("Tension pneumothorax") If true, this man could easily have died at the ranch or in transit.
C. Since we have received so little information, we have to infer from what little info has been made available. I've seen no info about the nature of the original surgery. It could have ranged from as minor as picking out shot and washing the wounds with sterile fluid to try and minimize chances for infection, or as serious as opening the chest to explore and/or repair major blood vessels or lung.
Of interest from the news conference: The doctor mentioned that they were "in communication with the White House, and the White House medical team" about this guy's care. He was asked why, and said that well the WH docs treated this guy in the field and were still involved in his care.
Also: he was obviously coached to try to get him to say "BB" instead of "shot" or even "pellet". He screwed up initially, correcting "BB" to "pellet", and then later in the conference, corrected "pellet" to "BB". Simply saying "birdshot" would have been correct and spin free, but of course they don't want that.
The language used seem designed to promote the impression that this was some very unusual migration of shot from the skin to the guy's heart. They didn't say this outright but that is the impression cultivated. What seems pretty likely from the scenario is that the shot penetrated the guy's chest into his heart and/or around it with the initial blast. It SOUNDS LIKE he was very nearly killed. It SOUNDS like he's likely to do fine, but he's by no means completely out of the woods yet.
One person's opinion and interpretation, take it as you will.
|