Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Cheney pay for quail party? Is this Illegal LOBBYING and BRIBERY?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 03:52 PM
Original message
Did Cheney pay for quail party? Is this Illegal LOBBYING and BRIBERY?
I've documented elsewhere that Katharine Armstrong the distraught hostess, is indeed a lobbyist with lots of Iraq construction business and military contracting business before the administration.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x417384

Also, the Armstrong Ranch owner, Ann Armstrong has enriched Cheney immensely by helping to appoint him CEO of Halliburton when she was on Halliburton's board.

The Armstrong's were big contributors to Bush, and Bush rewarded them with public board positions in Texas.

Therefore, if Cheney did not pay for his time on the Armstrong Ranch, I think there is an excellent case to be made that Cheney and Armstrong was engaged in illegal lobbying and bribery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Since he didn't have the 'stamp' for his license
It's technically POACHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What I mean by pay for is not the license -- the gift from the Armstrongs
Don't you see? It's just like what brought down Delay -- free trips to Scotland and all. This was a trip to hunt quail on a luxurious ranch owned by a family doing lobbying work before Bush and Cheney.

And the connections go back decades -- intertwined business dealings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm confused -- what was the bribe?
What did Cheney do in return for this "bribe"? And how is going hunting illegal lobbying?

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Remember why Delay went down?
Among other things taking expensive gifts from lobbyists, including free golf trips.

Katharine Armstrong is a lobbyist for a firm doing business in Iraq and and aircraft defense contractor.

If she was discussing business with Cheney will providing a free hunting trip, that's illegal. That's bribing Cheney to listen to her business proposals.

She was very adamant, but coy in the papers -- something to the effect, of I don't remember every lobbying the VP.

But the Armstrong's have been intertwined with Cheney for years, going back into Halliburton.

That's why they were covering this up -- not the shooting, not liquor, not girlfriends.

This is illegal lobbying! It's impeachable.

Cheney could go down over this.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x417384
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. A lot of assumptions being made
The indictment of Delay related to violations of Texas law relating to campaign finance law violations (specifically, the use of corporate money to advocate for the election/defeat of a candidate). It wasn't about lobbying. The issue in the golf trips was that a registered lobbyist paid for the travel. If it was illegal to play golf or go hunting with a lobbyist, there would be hundreds of indictments of both Democrats and repubs. At this point, it is unclear whether (a) Armstrong is a registered lobbyist and (b) who paid for Cheney's travel. He's done this same hunting trip for years. Its not a secret. So its unlikely that the "cover up" has anything to do with lobbying issues.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. answer and question:
Edited on Tue Feb-14-06 05:51 PM by HamdenRice
(a) Armstrong is a registered lobbyist by her own admission and

(b) who paid for Cheney's travel -- or his stay at the ranch -- that's the very question I'm asking.

And Armstrong had over $4 billion in business before the administration from just one client - Parsons - in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It seems the Armstrongs have made billions being friendly with Bush-Cheney
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes and Cheney made millions from the Armstrongs ...
He was a public servant with a public servant's wealth before becoming CEO of Halliburton while Anne Armstrong was on the board of Halliburton.

And Anne also knows all about Iran contra, central american death squads, everything about bush I.

Now daughter Katharine represents Iraq contractors, and military contractors, which Cheney doles out.

If the frequent hunting trips at "old family friends" ranch were freebies, and they discussed business, Cheney is going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I believe I read somewhere posted here today that the dinner
conversation was political in nature discussing Iran, North Korea and other things. Things that make you go hummmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can't decide what's worse.. that he didn't pay, or that *WE* payed
for his little quail-tard/lawyer hunting trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC