Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$1.6 billion : Nancy Pelosi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:14 PM
Original message
$1.6 billion : Nancy Pelosi
I haven't seen many people online talking about a new GAO report that Rep. Henry Waxman, Rep. George Miller, Rep. Elijah Cummings and I released yesterday, so I wanted to draw your attention to it. I'll say it again, $1.6 billion. You can do a lot of good with that kind of money -- support the rebuilding of our Gulf Coast, invest in medical research, increase scholarship and student loan programs, even pay down the deficit.
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi's diary :: ::

But the Bush Administration has other priorities.

The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) has discovered that the Bush Administration has spent more than $1.6 billion in tax payer dollars on PR and advertising in a two and a half year span. Instead of using that money to improve our schools, pay for books or classroom supplies or teachers' salaries, the Bush Administration used it for propaganda to promote No Child Left Behind. Instead of using it to support families suffering in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, that money was used to advertise "marriage-related research initiatives." Instead of buying equipment for the nation's first responders, it was used to promote "the Army's strategic perspective in the Global War on Terrorism." And instead of lowering prescription drug costs, that money paid for a FDA contract to warn the public of the consequences and potential danger of importing prescription drugs from other nations.

And the GAO's report just scratches the surface. The GAO surveyed only seven of the 15 cabinet-level departments, relied on self-reported information from the agencies, and did not include subcontracts, task orders on existing contracts, or public relations work done by government employees.

The truth is, no amount of money will successfully sell the Bush Administration's failed policies, from the war in Iraq, to its disastrous energy policy, to its confusing Medicare prescription drug bill. But $1.6 billion dollars?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/14/1784/69126
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. CNN reporting on this now
The lead was "While cutting programs for the poor...". I was impressed with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seriously! How very unFAUXlike of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yea no kidding..
Maybe there is hope. It was Lou Dobbs saying it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:26 PM
Original message
Actually, that sounds just like Lou Dobbs.
He doesn't care for this administration much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. She lays it out so it should be obvious to anyone who still thinks...
...that Bush "cares" about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd like to know what Bush's personal PR budget is
for backdrops and fancy podiums. and giant jets to fly him around to photo-ops with his entourage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. 1.6 Billion for PR and advertising.. in 2 YEARS! That's really outrageous
False commercials. Hiring the likes of Armstrong Williams. It's sickening when they're cutting social programs right and left. 1.6 Billion would have funded a lot of programs for the needy but the Bush Administration thinks it's more useful funding propoganda.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why do I think that $1.6 Billion is actually...
the tip of the iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Because Pelosi said the report was limited to agency self-reporting?
Based on that, I sure as hell think it's the tip of the iceberg. That's pretty much a classical definition of the expression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lou Dobbs just reported on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. 1.6 Billion is incomprehensible. Even these days it's a lot of money
that could go a long way to build schools, roads, help small businesses and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC