Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone see the Bill Maher show last night?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:52 PM
Original message
Anyone see the Bill Maher show last night?
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 02:10 PM by augie38
Is it me or did his show stink last nite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can still smell it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't the best show I've seen of his. The guests were the problem.
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 01:55 PM by NYCGirl
Senor was superficial, as was Griffin. And although I love Helen Thomas, she's not the best at leading a conversation.

Edited to add: Not a good mix of guests at all. I suspect if Fred Barnes and Russ Feingold had been on the panel instead of on the remote, it would have been a better discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But even his monoluge sucked.
And as host, it is his job to lead, not Helen's. It was Bill. He had a really off night. He has done better with worse guests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I laughed at the monolog. And was relieved when it was time for the
"New Rules."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. With the start of Bil's monologue (not good),
I thought it went down hill from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. It sucked, I thought. It was like the energy was gone.
Poor Helen brought up really good points they could have run with and they deflated like a baloon. I sure hope he gets better. But If you couldn't be witty about the Cheney incident, there can't be much hope! Wonder what happened? Maybe he is sick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. No good guests is right.
Griffin was too tangential. Helen doesn't react quickly. Senor was OK, but Bushies are surely at a disadvantage when it comes to humor.

Hope it gets better.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought it sucked, I did not even stay up to
finish it. It reeked and he was off, everything was somehow different.. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. it was a MAJOR disappointment-
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 02:06 PM by QuestionAll
although the cheeny commercial at the very beginning was good.

it was all the more disappointing, because we had a couple of good lefty friends over who hadn't ever seen the show, and we had really been talking it up.

c'mon bill- you can do MUCH better- and it's definitely not for lack of material to work with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. What a bummer for you guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was so bored I fell asleep after the monologue
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. It stunk! Big Time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. I saw it, but had a very long day, and had a hard time staying awake n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good, I fell asleep during the monologue
Glad to hear I didn't miss nuthin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. It seemed to me to be...
uncomfortable around that table...as if they were engulfed in a cloud of anxiety. Maybe it's getting harder to find humor in the continuing calamity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Is it just me, or does everyone on that show avoid asking the most
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 03:06 PM by stopbush
obvious questions?

For instance, when the former Bush spokesman was going on about the missing billions in Iraq and how it's hard
to set up a "first world accounting system" in a "third world country," why not ask the obvious question:

Question: was the loss of those billions of dollars all part of bushco's post-war plan, or was it something
they didn't anticipate even though they knew they were going to be throwing money at a
"third-world accounting sysem"...or did they simply not have a plan at all?


The answer is one of those three scenarios, but no one on the panel had the wits to ask a
question that would have pointed to the CAUSE of the loss of the billions.

Bill is not good when his guests don't play to his prepared talking points. Case in point - his interview
with Russ Feingold. Bill wants Dems to make global warming a causus belli, Feingold rightly says
"after we get a handle on all of the illegal NSA stuff," so Bill wimps out. Of course, what Feingold (or any
Dem, for that matter) COULD have answered was, "Bill, why do you believe that fixing the environment
is strictly a Dem problem? Why are you giving Repugs a free ride when their policies are the ones creating
the problem? Why are you not calling on Repugs to repair the damage their policies have done? Why do you
frame the issue as 'Repugs cause all of these problems and it's up to Dems to solve them'? Why not hold Repugs
to the same standard of decency and responsibility that you do Dems?"

Bill's only good shot last night was when he took Fred Barnes on about Barnes calling bush a "rebel"
in his new book. Bill pointed out that a "real" rebel would take on corporations, but that line of reasoning
petered out pretty quickly as well, even though Bill coulda rammed that home with a vengeance.

Bill's problem is that he is lazy in his research. Like a broken clock, he gets a few zingers in a couple of times
per show, but there is no *depth of knowledge* there to ask tough follow-up questions...or to debunk
the RW likes that get spewed by his RW guests.

BTW - I turned Real Time off right before the New Rules. I had had enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. You are right
Bill Maher's big thing is global warming, and rightiously so, but the shit that this administration is getting away with at this time, and the Iraq war, is a more imprortant issue than global warming at this time. Talking about global warming, and making it an issue, at this time will not win election. We need to be in charge before anything can be done. He should know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think he's done and is just riding it out until the checks stop. Then
he can go to his island and watch the fireworks from a safe distance. I'm seeing this more often in the last year or so, the wealthy setting up their out of country retreats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. It did not rock
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 03:12 PM by Sugarcoated
unfortunately. As someone said, a bad mix of guests. Except Russ - he was great, but again, as was said, he needed to be sitting at that table speaking truth to power in his amazingly straightforward way. He'd win any debate, powerful, full of integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think Maher is dreadfully uninformed.
NEW RULE: Less Hollywood parties, and more reading!

At one time he had his finger on the pulse, but I think he's gotten lazy. For him to act as if the NSA spying issue wasn't serious, just shows how uninformed, and out of touch he really is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. With Bill, the terrorists have won. He's so scared of another attack...
that he condones wiretapping at any degree. He's still freaked out, big time.
Plus Russ Feingold gave him a severe "chumpslapping", as well as did Helen Thomas IMHO.

Eddie Griffen was too "ghetto", for the other guests. Did you see how Helen Thomas was looking at him while he was going on with his "hip-hop", banter?
Priceless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Rich people don't have to worry about the constitution.
When it gets bad here, they'll just take their money and run.

Maher is starting to really paint himself in that light.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. She liked old Eddie, though...
He may have been "ghetto," but he was telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC