Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Vioxx jury says Merck not liable in death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:48 PM
Original message
Federal Vioxx jury says Merck not liable in death
a lot has slid under the radar of the heartless shooting.
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-02-17T235715Z_01_N17268590_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-MERCK-VIOXX-DC.XML

Federal Vioxx jury says Merck not liable in death
Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:58 PM GMT

By Michael Depp

NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - A federal jury said on Friday that drugmaker Merck Co. Inc. was not liable in the 2001 death of a Florida man who used the recalled painkiller Vioxx.

The eight-person jury's verdict was the first in a federal court and the third out of more than 9,000 cases filed against Merck in U.S. and state courts claiming the company hid the once-best-selling painkiller's health risks.

Specifically, the jury found Vioxx was not a defective product, that Merck was neither negligent in making the product nor did it fail to warn users of its risks.

big pharma wins again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. And in TX a widow won $26M...
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=FT&Date=20060217&ID=5518378

snip//

Merck has received split decisions in the first two trials held in state courts. It lost the first trial in Texas, where a jury awarded $26m in damages to a widow, and it won a case in New Jersey in November.

snip//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. The problem with Vioxx was how it was marketed
as a pain control to be used long term. Those Cox-2 inhibitors should be used short term, only. I found them to be astonishingly good at ending dental pain, and I suspect they'd be equally good for a lot of acute pain.

Merck knew full well there was a problem and Merck did hide that problem for several years. The article is unclear about whether or not this particular person took the drug after it was recalled, or before.

The real root of the problem is the drug war, though. Big Pill is determined to come up with a non opiod treatment from chronic pain, and it seems that the safest long term pain control is the opioids. Everything they have come up with from aspirin on down the line has too many life threatening side effects when used over the years that pain patients must use drugs in order to cope to be a viable solution, and the deaths of pain patients are the result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. well sorry to say i'm rooting for merck
vioxx was a good drug, and it doesn't cause that mental fuzziness or in my case nausea caused by the opiates, we do need something new that is not an opiate and allows us to keep our mental clarity while fighting pain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC