Fukuyama's idea of the end of history in corporate capitalism is utter nonsense. It is a social state that will, if anything, guarantee future conflicts.
I believe that a world-wide, static capitalist state is not only possible, but well on its way.
The conditions that would bring about such a state would include a) centralization of capital into structures that span nations (so that war between industrialized nations would never be allowed to disrupt the
status quo), b) elimination of the middle class, and strict division of society into haves and have-nots, c) centralization of information (so that any potential individual threats to the system can be identified and tracked long before they're able to pose a genuine threat -- TIA, GPS-based pinpointing of individual's location, etc.), and d) the construction of a military/police apparatus willing, through legal or extra-legal means, to use brute force against the "bad apples" among its own citizens so as to stop any threats to the system.
Once you have these in place, there remains only a matter of fine-tuning: first, the minimum level of reward to be given to the military/police apparatus, to keep them happy and dissuade them from turning against the system that keeps them above the have-nots, and, second, the minimum level that has to be given to the have-nots to discourage most of them from thinking that even death in an uprising would be preferable to their current meager existence. Once you've got those levels tuned, the capitalist state can last indefinitely, or at least until the natural resources to support production run out.
Of the four required conditions, two (a and c) are already in place, one (b) is well on its way, and one (d) is currently in the budding stages.
And, if you want to know what the future looks like, unless we fight like hell to change it
right now, it looks an awful lot like a Chinese factory to me.
:-(