Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I see a lot of Carlyle-DPW connections... but...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:47 AM
Original message
I see a lot of Carlyle-DPW connections... but...
However, does the company selling control of the ports - that British Company - have any ties to Snow, Carlyle, Sanborn, etc?

I have not seen that yet, but I have not read everything on DU the past few days due to a busy work schedule & my daughter being a little bit sick.

Any direct links to articles would be appreciated.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here you go -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does it matter? If so, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It matters a bit
If there are other WH players that would benefit from the sale of P&O to DPW, then that would be something to look into.

I'm trying to figure out how the WH could have played a role in this - obviously, they are connected to DPW, so that gives DPW the inside track to get approval over the Chinese group that also wanted to buy...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. What are the Carlyle DPW connections? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. for starters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Refuted in post #46 of your first link
Your nsnet link is about British submarines - how's that for a non sequitur?

So, any non-refuted links?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. muriel -
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 12:16 PM by sparosnare
there have been a lot of theories about the Carlyle group being a component or tied in some way to this port deal. I've noticed that quite often when someone mentions it in a post (including myself), you step and and say Carlyle isn't involved in any way. The Carlyle group is a huge company with so many subsidiaries in different countries it's mind-boggling, CSX aside. How can you be sure they will not benefit from this deal? How do you know? Curious. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. My point is that no-one has ever shown any evidence
yet there are constant threads like this that claim the link has been proved. I can't be sure that the Chinese government won't benefit from this deal, I suppose, or Hitachi. Yet Carlyle is the group that DUers are constantly claiming is involved. I think DU is over-obsessed with the Carlyle Group, which can make the claims here look unreliable when there's no evidence to back them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It's their history with the Bush family.
That's why so many people think they'd be involved, just like Halliburton. However I'm not sure anyone is stating it as fact, it's just speculation. Since it's obvious a decision like this made by our government is done for the benefit of corporations, it makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. The link I saw had them as a $13.9 billion company
That's peanuts compared to ExxonMobil (nearly $400 billion), Wal-Mart, BP, Citigroup, GM, GE, HSBC, Hitachi, Mitsubishi and about 100 others worldwide.

In fact, I think the list had them as managing $13.9 billion. When you have companies like Citigroup, Fidelity and others that manage $1 trillion or so, Carlyle is not that huge.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's their unofficial value (equity capital); has portfolio companies
Critics of the Carlyle Group frequently note its connections to various political figures. Some of the sectors and companies it invests in are highly sensitive to political activity, indeed its actions may be viewed as a form of political arbitrage. This may create conflicts of interest when political decision makers have their own personal wealth linked to such investments. Unlike most private equity firms which are predominantly located in New York, Boston or around San Francisco, Carlyle is the only large private equity firm located in Washington, DC. Corporate headquarters are on Pennsylvania Avenue, midway between the White House and the Capitol building.

Critics will often refer to Carlyle as a private defense contractor, but this is not completely accurate. It is a private equity firm that owns controlling or partial interests in a portfolio of companies, some of which are contractors for the military (though this is the area for which it is most well known). For example, it lobbied for the XM2001 Crusader artillery project, because one of its portfolio companies would be able to share in the contract. Likewise, it has a history of leveraged buyouts in the aerospace and defense industries.

In the book House of Bush, House of Saud, author Craig Unger states that Saudi Arabian interests have given 1.4 billion Dollars to firms connected to the Bush family. That figure was quoted by Michael Moore in his film Fahrenheit 9/11. Nearly 90% of the 1.4 billion, about 1.18 billion, refers to Saudi Arabian government contracts awarded to defense contractor BDM in the early to mid 1990s. At that time BDM was owned by the Carlyle Group.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlyle_Group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. It's pretty big when you remember they're a PRIVATE GLOBAL
EQUITY firm.

PRIVATE equity. No pesky rules and regulations that corporations must follow; no public accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Old old, HUGE company
It would take alot of digging to figure out the ins and outs of this company. It dates back to 1830 and is just HUGE.

http://portal.pohub.com/portal/page?_pageid=71,212168&_dad=pogprtl&_schema=POGPRTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. The company buying P & O
has ties to John Snow. Dubai Ports World is a mix of Dubai Ports Authority and DPI Terminals. Dubai Ports World wants to buy the British port company P & 0.

In 2004, Dubai Ports World purchased another shpping company named CSX World Terminals. CSX World Terminals is a division of CSX Corporation. Up until he became US Treasury Secretary, John Snow was CEO of CSX Corporation...

read more here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=489192
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC