Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHITE ROSE: Proposed Anti-Corporate Rule Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:20 AM
Original message
WHITE ROSE: Proposed Anti-Corporate Rule Amendment
This is just part of it, but it is the kind of thing a real democracy would be talking about doing.





The Proposed Anti-Corporate Rule Amendment



Section I

The rights given to the people as set forth by the constitution and its amendments can not be construed to apply to any corporation or business entity. All business entities are paper creations of society and as such have no rights under the constitution or its amendments with the exception of the rights granted to them in this amendment; business entities only retain a conditional privilege to operate. A privilege, which can be revoked as, set forth in this amendment.
This amendment applies to all business entities regardless of country of origin.

<snip>

Section III


Congress is given the right to alter the terms of all general charters, however congress cannot extend a charter beyond the limits set forth here. No charter will be granted to any business entity in which their revenue exceeds one hundredth of one percent of the federal budget. Business entities exceeding that limit must be broken into two or more companies within six months. Nor will any charters be granted that does not restrict the operations to a single economic activity or business. Nor will any charter be granted that does not require a seventy five percent majority of individual stockholders for election of officers, passage of mergers, buyouts, or a change in internal governance. In such elections, each shareholder will have one vote regardless of the number of shares they may own.

<snip>

Section VI

Business entities are given the right to sue and the right to be sued. However, the operating officers and governing boards can and will be held responsible for any gross, continuous, or frequent violations of any laws.
Gross, continuous or frequent violations shall hereby be defined as more than three violations of the same law within any two-year period. Congress will establish prison terms of not less than five years for the operating officers and governing board of directors for violations of labor, environmental and general law. No immunity from prosecution will be extended beyond the rights of the common citizen to the operating officers and governing board of any business entity in either criminal or civil law.

The rest:

http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/amendment.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. We endorse that other White Rose site, BTW.
They have been kind enough over the years to allow http://www.WhiteRoseSociety.org to link to their material about the Historical White Rose. A kindness that has been greatly appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ah! I didn't know they were two separate deals. If you want an edit, let
me know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No need! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Could it be renamed the Corporate Charter Amendment?
Sounds like a great idea.

One question in regards to Section III. With the federal budget at $2.7 trillion, your calculations would limit any company to revenues to approximately $270 million. While that would not affect most companies, what of the companies that sell more than that amount of a single product? How would they be affected? i.e. someone selling $1billion worth of paper or oil.

I think that Section I is the most important, as corporations have been given these rights by the courts over the years and I see that as wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I didn't write it, just thought it was a good starting point.
those are good issues though.

I'd say if they are selling one product or category of product, and there's sufficient competition, that shouldn't be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC