Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay so how long have our ports not been owned / run by the US?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:41 AM
Original message
Okay so how long have our ports not been owned / run by the US?
Although I know I'm not the only person who was unaware I must admuit that I feel a bit foolish that it never occured to me that our ports could be owned by anyone other then the US no less a business outside the US.

Does anyone know the history of our ports ownership and operations? When did we last actually own and run our own ports and who has owned them since we first sold them? All I know is about the UK selling them to the UAE and my admittedly quick Google search didn't yield much.

TIA B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. The politicians (both sides) and their corporate handlers
sold this country out years ago. Not just the ports but everything else too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry told us several times during the campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a complex question.
Some ports are state entities, some are private concerns, some are 'special districts' within a political jurisdiction (state, county, local, etc).

Ports usally hire a terminal operating company to run the cranes, manage the traffic, etc. To me the issue is not that this work is 'privatized' but WHO it is privatized to. A company owned by a foreign government (ANY foreign government) would be right off my list.

Much as US domestic freight MUST be handled by a US carrier (The Jones Act) I think the operations of US ports should be as much as possible performed by, or at least under the supervision of, US entities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The change in operational management
coincided with the transition from "break bulk" to "roll on-roll off" and then to "containers." The change in technology began in the late 1960's to early 1970's.

I would favor bringing port operators under the Jones Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The Jones Act... I don't recall learning about that so Googled it...
Although I don't have time to read it all right now (but will later) from what I found quickly it does sound like the ports could be added to that. If so that would be an excellent idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. P&O is an old old old company
Been around since 1830. Not quite the same thing as the UAE. Still, a country has to have some control over its own assets to still be considered a country. It would seem to me, ports and borders is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree w/ "ports and borders is one of them". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. My thoughts exactly
I posted on another thread that the issue should've been that this is another outsourcing deal....send more money overseas. Somebody replied that there aren't any American companies that do this.

Doesn't that seem rather absurd? No American companies specialize in running port operations. Unbelievable. We're a country on morons that deserve whatever crappy economic condition we inflict upon ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have tried to find out that info...
have not had much luck. It is an important question, because I do not think it has been a long standing relationship. I seem to remember hearing as recently as the year 2000 for one of the ports. But as I said, I do not know...hopefully someone with a better knowledge of this area will respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was unaware too, and found this info the other day
During the Clinton administration, a Long Beach port (and perhaps others) was sold to Hutchinson-Wampoa (known as COSCO -- China Ocean Shipping Company, a state -owned enterprise of the People's Republic of China).

for details:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=485828&mesg_id=486258
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. I found a link that...
that mentions P&O signing a 30 year lease in 2000. Needless to say, 2006 is well short of that.


<http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-02-19-port-steps_x.htm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. So P&O leased the ports from the states & is basically sub-leasing to UAE?
If NY can cancel it's lease with P&O then the port belongs to the state and like any landlord the state should have a right to approve whomever the tenant (P&O) wants to sub-lease too (UAE) right?

New York's legal options could include canceling the lease for operation, effectively shutting out Dubai Ports World from port activities. P&O signed a 30-year lease with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 2000 to operate the Port Newark Container Terminal.


Okay... to go a step further... Who owns/runs the entry "ports" at the Canadian and Mexican borders? Who owns/runs the entry "ports" at the International Airports? There's a heck of a lot of International Commerce that comes into our country that way as well so who's in charge there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe the UK is playing a game with the US...
Looks like it's working.

B)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC