Kerry knew exactly what he was talking about through his investigations that lasted a decade.
In his book "The New War" (which by the way he mentioned often, if people were really paying attention, you couldn't rely on the media to repeat that) he just hits it right in so many ways. He knows, and damn the media.
From his book:
pg. 29
Crime can triumph by seizing partial control of a country's presidency and congress, as it has in Columbia. (I think we can use the USA as an example now, JMO)
Crime can triumph by bringing down a nascent democracy like Russia, thereby throwing the international polital scene into tension and turmoil.
Crime can triumph by corrupting everyone in a society- from high officials to fisherman who prefer making $10,000 a night smuggling drugs to earn $700 a week chasing thinning stocks of fish. When he was a state legislator, Abe Lincoln once threw a man out of his office who had kept upping his bribe offer. Was I offering to little? the man asked. No, explained Lincoln, you were getting to near my price.
pg. 25
Criminals have always tried to corrupt the social process by bribing politicians, judges, and witnesses, but they never had any intentions of challenging the social order as a whole. That is not true of the new globalized crime and its fraternal twin, terrorism. Now crime often uses methods of terrorism, the assaination of political candidates in Columbia being the most obvious example. And though terrorism is the use of criminal means for political or ideoologicalends, the distinction often blurs. It is no accident that my subcommittee investigated crime and terrorism as parts of a single sinister assault on society.
Kerry knows and he would have been going after the terrorists, and we would be safer now. I would encourage everyone to read this book.