|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:34 AM Original message |
So tell me, who were we supposed to be protecting in Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. The British press has a different take on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I'm stunned at the chasm between the 60 number and the thousands number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
2. From what I understand, the US isn't supposed to take sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. There's no reason at all why our troops should still be there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. Dontcha know? Protecting the WHIG & subsidiaries.... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
5. protecting war profiteers has become the US militarys mission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genie_weenie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. That always was the Military's job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. Our "Vital National Interests" aka $$$$$$$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
8. Did the oil sheiks get hit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MountainLaurel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-28-06 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
9. Not who, what . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC