so now they are going to swear in the witnesses at the nsa spying

[madokie]

hearing. but not the Attorney General, what a crock.

[unblock]

1. failure to swear in is admitting to being an accomplice to perjury.

the corruption of the banana republicans knows no bounds.

[madokie]

2. I believe us here were thinking and typing that this would be the way

they were going to do it. No swearing in of the most important witness of all, the torture king, water board boy, flushing koran mo' foker:mad:
edited to add :mad:

[InternalDialogue]

3. For the purposes of rhetoric

there is a small upside to this situation: When the testimony of NSA insiders or former employees contradicts the nonchalance and false assurances of the attorney general, I'll tell friends that I'm putting my money on the witnesses who were honorable enough to swear an oath to speak the truth.

It doesn't fix anything, it doesn't change anything, but it's a small point of logic you can hang a very tiny hat on.

[madokie]

4. I agree a hundred percent. It was, so i thought at the time of not

swearing in the one who needed it the most was a done deal straight out of the kkkarl workbook. Waterboard boy needs to be hanging on that hook. Maybe, maybe they'll have him back and swear his sorry ass in then. I'm not holding my breath though.