Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary in '08

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:26 AM
Original message
Poll question: Hillary in '08
I know this has been polled often but i'm curious. What's your reaction to hillary being our nominee in '08.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. She voted yes on the iraq war, she voted yes on the patriot act
she is NOT in our best interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Groucho and zeppo agree with Harpo.
as do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. On the bright side, she would help the Green Vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary like Joe Lieberman knows what the real problem in America is
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 09:42 AM by YOY
Not war or lost constitutional rights or even choice losing grounds.

Video Games... That's the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Flag burning. Don't forget flag burning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madame defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Read this article...
From yesterday's NYTimes Magazine about Mark Warner & his chances of beating Hillary... It's long, but you can skim it to get what you want. The interesting thing I took away from this is that the political machine will push to get Hillary the nomination, but the grassroots organizations & people could very well get Warner the nomination. I'm going to keep my eye on Warner; he has potential, IMHO... Is he as liberal as I would like? No, but he's also not as polorizing as Hillary and could help balance the country. He also has one huge thing going for him: he's pro-business, which will really help get the fiscal Republicans (i.e., corporate voters) to recognize that the Republicans are no longer the party of fiscal responsibility. We have to face the facts that globalization & corporate entities are a permanent part of the landscape. We need to figure out how to make that work for the majority of Americans by providing jobs, healthcare, & education to keep us as a key player in the world.

The Fallback
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/12/magazine/312bwarner.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not my first choice by a long shot. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. NO TO HILLARY!!
She will NOT be elected and should NOT be nominated. We need a candidate who speaks to and appeals to white males in the red staes. And she ain't the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Make one of these charts up for Feingold!!!!!!!!!! see what happens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. OK
But not sure how relevant that is - Feingold hasn't got much of a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. And then Michael Reagan, Jeb Bush, Chelsea, Pierce....
Didn't we fight a revolution to get rid of dynastic monarchical society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC