Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT-MUST/MUST READ (MoDo) Fly Into A Building? Who Could Imagine?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 01:10 AM
Original message
NYT-MUST/MUST READ (MoDo) Fly Into A Building? Who Could Imagine?
NYT: MoDo rips into Bush's FBI for not stopping 9.11 when they had Moussaoui in their hands before the attacks

Op-Ed Columnist
Fly Into a Building? Who Could Imagine?

By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: March 22, 2006

Three little words:

Still employed there.


Of all the through-the-looking-glass moments in the last few days, the strangest is this: The F.B.I officer who arrested and questioned Zacarias Moussaoui told a jury that he had alerted his superiors about 70 times that Mr. Moussaoui was a radical Islamic fundamentalist who hated America and might be plotting to hijack an airplane.

Seventy? That makes one time for every virgin waiting for Mr. Moussaoui in heaven. Judging by how disastrously the prosecution is doing, the virgins will have to wait.

We could have cracked the 9/11 plot if the F.B.I. wasn't run by dunces. Mr. Moussaoui's lawyers got a break because according to the testimony of the officer, Harry Samit, a better-run bureau could have broken the case even without the terrorist's confession — maybe F.B.I. officers should have shot him with some paintballs.

On Sept. 10, 2001, Mr. Samit confided to a colleague that he was "desperate to get into Moussaoui's computer." He never heard back from the F.B.I.'s bin Laden unit before 9/11 — what did the unit have to do that was more pressing than catching bin Laden? And he was obstructed by officials in F.B.I. headquarters here, whom he labeled "criminally negligent."

read the whole thing at:
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/03/22/opinion/22dowd.html?hp
via:
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/03/tomorrows-news-of-interest-now.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. What was more pressing? Morality. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think he was referring to Ashcroft's first moves as AG
In 2001, he assigned a sizeable portion of the FBI to the task of busting hookers in New Orleans.

I think they got about a dozen of them or so in the end.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. and porn! He was zeroing in on the pornographers!
and also his budget for fighting terrorism as of 9/10/01 was $0.00.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. how can I read it without paying?
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sperk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's pretty clear that the higher ups didn't want that computer searched
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC