Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC: "Australia to block gay unions"(John Howard uses another Bushie ploy)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 04:24 AM
Original message
BBC: "Australia to block gay unions"(John Howard uses another Bushie ploy)
John Howard's government has been doing some ugly things that should sound quite familiar to those who oppose the Bush Administration's fascist policies. They have their own version of the Patriot Act, they've whipped up "terrorist" fears to get support for power grabs and destruction of civil liberties. So this move to capitalize on gay demonization should not be surprising. The same cards are being played for the same purpose: hyping public fears in order to push incremental fascist power grabs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4859706.stm
ast Updated: Thursday, 30 March 2006, 06:39 GMT 07:39 UK

Australia to block gay unions



Caption: Mr Howard's government formalised marriage laws in 2004

The Australian government has said it will oppose any new laws legalising gay civil unions.

Prime Minister John Howard said he did not intend to allow the institution of marriage "to be in any way undermined".

The authorities in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), which includes the capital Canberra, introduced a bill on same-sex civil unions last week.

If the legislation is passed, it will be the first such law in Australia, but federal government can overturn it.

(snip)


Some earlier articles & threads on John Howard's Bush-like policies in Australia:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1810200
thread title (9/27/05): ASIO watching 800 extremists (Aust)
(See Reply #2 for an article on the new Patriot Act-like powers)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5286157
thread title (11/7/05): Australia govt accused of security (terra) scare campaign

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4413338.stm
BBC article Nov 7 2005 - Australia plans army terror role

There is even the carefully timed "we foiled a major terrorist attack" ploy:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1907307
thread title (11/7/05): Australia foils major attack


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. one kick for what's left of the night. See, it's not just BUSH, this
fascist movement has tentacles all over the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Too right. (see downthread for more) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeh. Freaking little Johnnie has got his tongue planted frimly in
Edited on Thu Mar-30-06 05:35 AM by Random_Australian
*'s kyhber pass (That is ryhming slang), free trade agreement, terrorists, consume, war, WMD, crap like that. And what's more our compulsory voting system has given us very competent crooks... err politicians.

The worst is just starting now: Industrial Relations Reform: Sick leave, holidays, overtime, working hours, every right of the Australian workers is now no longer garanteed. F*ck.

Starting about 2 days ago actually.

Edit: oh yeah, the PBS which has given Australians affordable medication is at last coming down, but it has some life in it yet! All the power gain now is for Big Pharm to 'request' an 'independant enquiry'... as if Big Pharm would stop there... it's the beginning of the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's very sad to hear how Australia is going down this terrible path too.
Edited on Thu Mar-30-06 03:34 PM by Nothing Without Hope
Hitler's approach still works - scare them enough and they will let you take away all their rights and protections and allow unspeakable cruelty. The looting by the world fascists is picking up speed.

Thank you for your comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. From the wording of the article, I conclude that John Howard's government
fixed the legal language on marriage being "only between a man and a woman" back in 2004 and that he is now saying that his government will block a current attempt to remove that language. He sounds like another monster in the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld... image.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes...
...discrimination was written into our constitution in 2004, with the law declaring that marriage ie between one man and ne woman. It passed because the Labor party (the lefties) helped it to pass. However it was left up to state rights for what the states would do. Now my take on this article is that they are planning on not allowing the states to have their own rights with regards to civil unions. Which by the way have the support of the majority of the country.

The majority of the people here would like to something introduced like the U.K introduced last year. Unfortunately with Little Johnnie Bush Lover holding the top job, that won't be happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Question: are national elections as corrupted in Australia as they are
in the US? Both the 2000 and the 2004 presidential (and many congressional) elections were stolen outright by Bush supporters, using a combination of electronic vote hacking, secret massive voter registration purges, and various other ploys. How safe from election fraud is the national vote in Australia? If John Howard becomes truly unpopular, can he and his cabal be voted out in favor of better people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well thankfully...
...ours are still a paper ballot. Although the last election (2004) it was pretty suspect to me. Latham the Labor Leader running for the top job was ahead in all the polls. The night before the election was the debate, and Latham lead all the way in that, yet some how Howard still managed to win the election. Go figure!

As for having him ousted, well they can do it illegally like the did with Gough Whitlam back in 1975, when they had the Attorney General (the Queens representative here) dismiss him from duties. Or they can do it like they did with Bob Hawke in 1991 when his own party (The Australian Labor Party) moved to oust him (much like what can be done in the U.K.) But as for an actual election to have him outed won't happen unless he calls it himself. And he isn't likely to do that right now considering the Liberal Party is behind the Labor Party in the polls.

And trust me, with his Industrial Relations Laws introduced just this past Monday, he really is pretty unpopular right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks. So there's no time limit beyond which he has to run for re-
election?

Thank goodness you still have paper ballots, at least. (But the massive secret voter purges that happened in the US would affect the outcome even with paper ballots.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. ROFL! At first I thought this was talking about gay LABOR unions!
And I was sayin to myself: They've got enough gay folks to make one? Wow!

Think it's nap time again....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC