Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Labor Board Pushes to Clear Cases (3 R's backing probusiness positions; 2 democrats backing union)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:24 PM
Original message
Labor Board Pushes to Clear Cases (3 R's backing probusiness positions; 2 democrats backing union)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119206842371955622.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Ruling Could Limit
Union Organizing;
Pace Draws Fire
By KRIS MAHER
October 11, 2007; Page A12

The National Labor Relations Board has issued dozens of labor-law rulings in recent days, including a major decision that would limit unions' ability to organize workers.

The decisions come in a push to clear up cases before the terms of several members expire. Organized labor, which has long criticized the board under the Bush administration, charges that the recent activity is a partisan push, following several decisions reversing rulings made during the Clinton administration. Three of the board's five members are Republicans; the terms of two Republican and one Democratic board member are set to expire soon.

NLRB Chairman Robert J. Battista, who is a Republican, denies labor's characterization. "We have a statute to enforce," said Mr. Battista, whose five-year term expires in December. "Whether it helps the union or an employer is irrelevant." The board says that decisions on any cases left open when the three members' terms expire could be delayed for a year or more.

On six major decisions issued in the last two weeks, the board was split down party lines -- Republicans backing probusiness positions; Democrats backing unions' stands -- on such issues as union organizing, employing replacement workers following a strike and granting back pay to workers fired illegally.

Perhaps the most far-reaching decision limits how unions can organize using a method known as a card check, in which a company agrees to recognize the union once a majority of workers have signed cards showing their support. Businesses have argued that such an approach leaves workers open to union pressure. Unions favor card checks, which can be conducted quickly and without the company knowing about initial efforts. Secret balloting can be a longer process and companies often wage campaigns against the organizing attempt.

In its recent decision, the NLRB said a minority of workers can seek an election to decertify a union within 45 days of it being formed through a card check. In the past, workers had to wait six months to challenge the formation of a union via card check. The six-month period gives unions more time to negotiate a contract with an employer. Under federal labor law, once a contract is signed, workers can't challenge a union for the length of the contract, or three years, whichever is less. In a dissenting opinion, the two Democratic board members said the decision goes against "promoting the practice of collective bargaining."

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC