Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if Deadly Dust Explosions Were Airplane Crashes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:14 PM
Original message
What if Deadly Dust Explosions Were Airplane Crashes?

http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/02/25/what-if-deadly-dust-explosions-were-airplane-crashes/

by Mike Hall, Feb 25, 2008

If a certain kind of plane kept falling out of the sky, killing and maiming hundreds of passengers, the public would be outraged if the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ignored the advice of aviation experts calling for new safety standards.

Surely the outrage would boil over if the FAA instead told industry: “Hey are some voluntary safety guidelines. See what you can do, OK?”

http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1410389702&channel=1184612038


That’s a ludicrous scenario the federal government and the aviation industry would never allow to happen in real life, writes longtime workplace safety advocate Les Leopold. However, substitute dust explosions for crashing airplanes and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for the FAA—and that is the reality in our nation today, he says.

In a recent column on AlterNet, Leopold (who also authored the biography of legendary workplace safety activist Tony Mazzocchi) writes that in the past 12 years, there have been 281 dust explosions. The blasts were ignited by a variety of dusts, from grain to cotton to sugar. The most recent occurred Feb. 7 at the Imperial Sugar plant in Port Wentworth, Ga., killing nine workers and leaving 15 others still hospitalized in critical condition.

Such explosions have killed 119 workers and seriously injured another 781. But OSHA has ignored calls for a mandatory dust standard. A year ago, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) issued a report calling for mandatory regulations to prevent such explosions, Leopold writes, adding:

But as of the Port Wentworth catastrophe, the board had not received a written response from the Bush administration’s about what actions would be taken. The result of this laissez-affaire approach to regulation enabled the industry to police itself and we now see the fatal results.


FULL story at link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dervill Crow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
:kick:

My son works in a bread plant. It's not the first thing you think of when you think of dangerous jobs, but I worry a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC