Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tip-rules switch broke pacts, labor lawyer says (just like Starbucks)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 11:45 AM
Original message
Tip-rules switch broke pacts, labor lawyer says (just like Starbucks)

http://www.lvrj.com/business/17380614.html

Apr. 08, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Tip-rules switch broke pacts, labor lawyer says

No hint of court's position after hearing on Wynn case

By ARNOLD M. KNIGHTLY
REVIEW-JOURNAL

A Las Vegas labor attorney told Nevada's high court justices Monday that Wynn Las Vegas illegally violated employment agreements with its dealers when it changed its tip-pooling policy in 2006.

The Supreme Court justices heard arguments Monday from attorneys for the Strip hotel-casino and two dealers who sued Wynn Las Vegas after it changed its tip-pooling policy in September 2006. The seven justices asked questions of attorneys for both sides during a 40-minute hearing Monday, but gave no indication which way they were leaning or when they might issue a decision.

In late 2006, a Clark County District Court judge upheld Wynn Las Vegas' new tip-pooling policies, rejecting arguments that the hotel-casino's dealers are contract employees and that the new policy -- which reclassified some supervisors and allowed them to share some of the tip monies that had been given exclusively to dealers in the past -- illegally changed employment agreements.

The justices could uphold a ruling by District Court Judge Douglas Herndon dismissing a lawsuit brought by dealers Daniel Baldonado and Joseph Cesarz.

They could also overturn the lower court decision or send the dispute to the labor commissioner to resolve.

During the Monday hearing, labor attorney Leon Greenberg restated many of the same arguments he made during the District Court hearing: the change in the tip-pooling policy violated an employment agreement drafted before the property opened and that the new policy forcing dealers to share tips with supervisors violates state law. (Note that this is the third state with this type of law. Starbucks has had legal action taken against it in NY and Ca.)

"The tips no longer belong to the dealers, but to the Wynn, which distributed them as it saw fit," Greenberg argued.

FULL story and photos at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC