Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania on CNN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:09 PM
Original message
Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania on CNN
 
Run time: 06:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yxCdrUEzsI
 
Posted on YouTube: April 13, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: April 13, 2008
By DU Member: Hope And Change
Views on DU: 1049
 
Obama Supporter Sen. Bob Casey's Interview on CNN's Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Casey is anti-choice and wants Roe v. Wade overturned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So do many people in rural small town Pennsylvania......
and Casey's not running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Perhaps Sen. Casey is one of those bitter Pennsylvanians clinging to religion
Thanks for proving Senator Obama's point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Casey is experiencing economic problems?
He is a son of a popular governor. He is political royalty in Pennsylvania. Casey is actually an example of why Obama is wrong. People don't go to church or own guns because they are bitter or political dupes. It has been party of the culture in small towns long before there even was a Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is Blitzer a complete moron, or just a demagogue?
Why does he keep asking "what did that comment mean"? It should be perfectly obvious what it means.

It means wedge issues. The GOP has been completely disconnected from the majority on the truly important issues for 30 years. Issues like job protection, economic security, education, war, and the environment. On many of those very important issues, the fascists are against 70% of the public. How do they win? By creating phony wedge issues. They understand that can distract the public by whipping up prejudices and passions on artificial issues.

I wish the Obama camp would say this just a little more plainly. Some people are not getting it.

The point is that people know they are getting screwed economically, but neither party is speaking to that. That is what leaves the doors open for the Lee Atwaters (Rest in Hell) and the Karl Roves (Rest in Hell one day soon, I hope) to come in with their wedge issues.

1. The Democrats want to take away your guns.
2. The Democrats want to make your sons and daughters gay and mandate that everybody take up cross-dressing
3. The Democrats hate our freedoms. That's why they won't support our troops.
4. The Democrats are into killing babies. They won't stop at abortions, soon, they're going to be slaughtering 3-year=olds.

and so it goes. We need to be calling this shit out, and now is the perfect time because at least idiots like Blitzer are asking the question. This is the opportunity to call out these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digidigido Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Very Well Said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Wolf B. came out ot AIPAC. He and his handlers and minions are scared to death
of Obama. They are afraid he might turn out to be an honest broker vis a vie Isr@el and Palestine and the Arabs that are in range of Isr@el plus he has not taken any money from lobbyists, which scares them even more and that means they have no control over him. CNN has been blowing this out of all proportions and spinning it silly to out and out distortion since it came out. They are trying to make a Dean scream destroyer out of this.

From Wiki
Wolf Blitzer, who has the same first name as his maternal grandfather,<1> grew up in Buffalo, New York, the son of Jewish refugees from Poland. Blitzer graduated from Kenmore West Senior High School and received a B.A. degree in history from the University at Buffalo in 1970. While there, he was a brother of Alpha Epsilon Pi. In 1972, he received an M.A. degree in international relations from the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.

Career

Blitzer began his career in journalism in the early 1970s in the Tel Aviv bureau of the Reuters news agency. In 1973 he caught the eye of Jerusalem Post editor Ari Rath, who hired Blitzer as a Washington correspondent for the English language Israeli newspaper. Blitzer would remain with the Post until 1990, covering both American politics and developments in the Middle East.<2>

During his tenure with the Post, Blitzer interviewed several American Presidents and Secretaries of State and broke news from Lebanon, Egypt and Jordan. At the time, he was perhaps best known for his coverage of the arrest and trial of Jonathan Pollard, an Israeli spy in American naval intelligence.<2> Blitzer was the first journalist to interview Pollard, and he would later write a book about the Pollard Affair titled Territory of Lies.<3>

Sometime in the mid-1970s, Blitzer also worked for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee as the editor of their monthly in house publication, the Near East Report.<4><5> While at AIPAC, Blitzer's journalism focused on Middle East affairs as it relates to United States foreign policy. Contrary to popular speculation, Blitzer has never lobbied on behalf of AIPAC.

At an April 1977 White House press conference, Blitzer asked Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat why Egyptian scholars, athletes and journalists were not permitted to visit Israel. Sadat, somewhat taken aback, responded that such visits would be possible after an end to the state of belligerence between the two nations. This was the first time Sadat said that peace between Israel and Egypt was possible. In November of that year, Sadat made a historic visit to Israel, and Blitzer covered the negotiations between the two countries from the first joint Israeli-Egyptian press conference in 1977 to the final negotiations that would lead to the signing of the Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty two years later.<2>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. These AIPAC types must be really gripping about Jimmy Carter
The prospect of a President who actually insists that both sides address on a level basis must be horrifying to the State of Israel. With Carter endorsing Obama, IAPAC has to go after both of them.

That is even more reason why we need to get Hillary out of the picture so that AMERICANS, elected by AMERICANS to represent AMERICAN interests can come to Obama's support.

I certainly want to see Israel survive and be in a position to defend herself. But that's not what is happening. Israel has bee he belligerent actor here more often than not. AMERICA will not be safe until we can bring an era if peace and stability to the Israel-Palestine region. The people running Israel don't want peace. They feel they are in a better position maintaining AND FREQUENTLY USING overwhelming military power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. True, but
Obama did use some poor word choice here in his effort to explain why so many rural people vote on the gun, god, gays issues and why he (and Dems generally) aren't doing well enough to connect with them. First, he shouldn't have used the term "cling". Second, while his definitely analysis has some merit, he should say "some folks" and not paint with so broad a brush as no one wants to be stereotyped or tossed entirely into one basket. Next, he needs to understand that rural and small town folks have a long history of an affinity for hunting, religion, and these other cultural issues, not that they merely vote that way because Dems don't do well enough convincing them that we can help them more on the economic issues. He is correct in much of his analysis, but he actually went too far with it and used some poor word choice. So he needs to do what he has done: clarify his points and express honest regret for any inadvertent offense he may have caused. The way he explained the whole thing in his Indiana response was MUCH better. I am an Obama supporter, and I love him, but he does need to remember to stop talking like a Harvard trained law professor and talk more plainly, more from the gut and less from the "head," and in concrete terms. He needs to be "Barack the community organizer who grew up VERY modestly" and not "Barack the Harvard law professor channeling Mike Dukakis".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sen. Casey is a class act. No so Rendell. Obama is leaps and bounds more electable than Clinton is,
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 05:24 PM by wisteria
what with her past baggage, her inexperience and her un-likability. I said it before and I will say it again, Redell is after a cabinet post- that and payment on a favor owed to Bill Clinton for the cushy judgeship position Rendell's wife was appointed to by Bill. Politics as usually. Redell will sell out the party- if Clinton doesn't get the nomination he is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. The latest poll has Obama down 15 in FL, Clinton winning
Rendell is a good man, as is Casey. Let's not disparage Dem leaders simply because they disagree with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clevbot Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. nice post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC