Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

lol. Stephen Baldwin vs Ron Paul on Larry King Live (drug war)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:36 PM
Original message
lol. Stephen Baldwin vs Ron Paul on Larry King Live (drug war)
 
Run time: 09:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufekh_SwZd0
 
Posted on YouTube: March 14, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: March 14, 2009
By DU Member: SergeyDovlatov
Views on DU: 4188
 
This is just too funny. Liberal actor is fighting conservative republicans on the subject of legalizing drugs.
You cannot make this up.

Correction. I looked up, Stephen Baldwin seem to be a McCain / Palin Supporter. Boo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. liberal actor? crazy right wing idiot hack-actor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. really. Ron Paul's a liberal actor? news to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. You are getting idiot Steven Baldwin confused with his brother Alec a brilliant
and talented actor who is a liberal. Nut job Steven reeks havoc riding on his far more famous brothers coat tails. He is the least talented of all the Baldwins. Make that no talent what so ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. sorry this comment was meant for op
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 02:57 PM by ooglymoogly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
55. ..who had no problem pretending to toke in Pineapple express.
Edited on Sat Mar-21-09 01:36 AM by wroberts189

What hypocrite he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Two far-right nutjobs battle it out.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whenever I see some of the Hollywood nutters on my tv...
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 12:52 PM by liberalmuse
spewing right wing nonsense, my mind flashes back to the fearful days right after 9/11, where I imagine Victoria Jackson, Chuck Norris, Dennis Miller, Stephen Baldwin, etc. found themselves in the same room together and ended up fucking each others brains out until they went completely mad. There is no other viable explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. But, but, but....
Ron Paul is a Rupublican!!! He must be wrong about EVERYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. HeeHee.
That gave me a laugh. Personally, I'm far from a party loyalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. The problem with Ron Paul is that he may have the right position on some issues ...
... but almost never for the correct reason.

Here Paul is not arguing for legalization of marijuana, just against there being a "federal law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. I'll take right for the wrong reason over
wrong for the wrong reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. Well, except policy is based on the next layer down ...
... which is where a Ron Paul solution would go horribly wrong. Each state gets to decide the legality issue? Nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. he IS right for the right reason
i support legalization too.

but he is also correct that regardless of whether one is for
or against legalization, it is wrong for the FEDERAL govt. to
dictate to the states what drugs they legalize or criminalize.

the scotus got away with justifying medical mj raids based on
their (incorrect) interpretation of the commerce clause.

legalized medical MJ, does not trigger the commerce clause
jurisdiction, because a person who grows their own medical MJ
pursuant to a script is not engaged in COMMERCE, let alone
interstate commerce.

ron paul is spot on here.  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. it is wrong for the FEDERAL govt. to dictate to the states what drugs they legalize or criminalize.
Oh brother! Why do people fall for this crap?

Does this apply to prescription drugs too? I mean they're drugs. Anna and Heath didn't die from illegal drugs, y'know. How are they to be monitored, regulated, quality controlled. What if say, California makes Codeine over the counter (like it is in Mexico)?

If Ron Paulians would just think to the end of the sentence instead of stopping half way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. oh brother. get your facts straight. you are so wrong. look up "interstate commerce"
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 08:47 PM by paulsby
it applies to any drugs that DON'T INVOLVE INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

here's a hint prescription drugs , like codeine DO Involve interstate commerce. thus, the federal govt. has the lawful authority to regulate them.

cocaine (a CII drug, that is USED legally for some purposes, such as nasal surgery) is thus lawfully regulated by the feds because it involves interstate commerce, through production, distribution, etc.

it's called RULE OF LAW . DEAL WITH IT.

the rule of law is that if a substance does not involve interstate commerce, then the feds have no authority to control it.

now, as a matter of policy, i think codeine should be OTC, but that's a POLICY issue not a constitional law issue.

in the case of medical MJ, it is both. iow, the feds have no right (despite an erroneous imo federal ruling) to tell sally jane that she can't grow mj FOR HER OWN USE) pursuant to state law

sorry, but rule of law matters.

oh and codeine is over the counter in MANY countries besides mexico, to include australia, canada, costa rica, japan, and the UK (last i checked. non-exhaustive list)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. oh brother, it is called creative new ways of ignoring the constitution
Up until FDR, very few people interpreted 'interstate commerce clause' the way you suggested.
It took amendment to the constitution to prohibit alchohol in 1913, remember?

Interstate commerce clause is the way to ignore rule of law.

Interstate commerce clause allows everything from controlling what you grow for your own consumption in your backyard, to prohibiting partial birth abortions.

I defy you to find an example of a law that cannot be defended in some way or another by applealing to interstate commerce clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. Yeah, sounds great ....
... except when I happen to travel to my sister's place, with my medijuana in tow, and get arrested there for trafficking in drugs because she lives in a state run by neanderthals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. i may disagree with that as a matter of POLICY
but it is not a violation of constitutional principles.

look at statutory rape laws, for instance.

it's totally legal for you to have sex with a 16 yr old in my state. if you cross the line into some states, that can be a serious felony.

go into canada, and the age is 14.

etc.

so yes, in a system such as ours, a democratic republic, states can set different policies for acts that have an internal result only.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for the post.
It was entertaining.

Despite some of Ron Paul's past behavior, I find myself agreeing with everything he said here (I, of course, don't agree on getting rid of social security, like some libertarians talk about).

When anyone has a spare weekend, I'll talk about what I saw as a social worker (I'm now retired). The drug war has to end. It makes actual and de facto orphans of far too many children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why is this sibling of Eric Baldwin even on with his views??
Such lunacy from this nobody. This is the problem. Idiots like this turd quote research and facts that just don't exist. "Everybody knows....blah, blah, blah" = bull shit. Why even have some ignorant ass hole on to debate an important issue when he is just as empty headed as 95% of all the right wing ditto heads. They just spew shit that they think will be lapped up by their equally ignorant audience.

It needs to be legalized. We could make it available the same as we do with alcohol.....age of 21 or 18 or whatever. It already exists everywhere on campus and in social groups around the world. So make it legal, cut the cartels out of their game, and let's move on. Maybe it's time to refocus on alcohol. Isn't that one of the leading cause of auto accidents and deaths today? Isn't that one of the major forces of destruction in society today? God, what a fucked up value system we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Who's Eric Baldwin? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Baldwin had NO career -- so he becomes a born again
And *suddenly* he's an authority on drugs? Yeah -- Biodome was SUCH an educational experience for him. :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why is Stephen Baldwin still in America?
He promised he would leave the country if Obama won.

Why didn't the host ask him about that?

Here's the story and video from campaign season:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/01/stephen-baldwin-on-fox-ne_n_110169.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hemp can become marijuana when it flowers.
I'm against the lies, deceptions, and untruths used to criminalize marijuana. I also do not support the use of lies, deceptions, and untruths to legalize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. A Hemp crop
Within a certain distance can turn your beautiful Marijuana crop into Hemp. Useless to the smoker. It's easy for Baldwin to spew his shit because he's not sick. But I bet he loves the booze. Here's a quick video of prohibition and Hemp.

http://www.jabberwonk.com/flinker.cfm?cliid=8dtqx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Both Hemp and Marijuana Comes from the cannabis plant.
Hemp refers to the stems and seeds. Marijuana is the buds(flowers)and leaves. Ron Paul made it sound like it was something totally different. It's really not. Both Hemp and Marijuana is Cannabis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reform Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. know what your talking about
Only the female marijuana plants produce the intoxicating weed.The males flower is useless in regards to "Getting High"
It is illegal to even grow the male
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
49. Not entirely true. The best of males can contain about 2% THC. The worst females can contain 4% THC.
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 02:17 PM by Wizard777
There are Hybrid (females) that can contain up to 28% THC. But THC is present in both Male and female plants. But the female is most desirable for "getting high" because of the higher THC content in the trichomes in the pubescent females. It is theorized that the plant produces THC as a defense against herbivores. I find this to be a fallacy because most herbivores find it be a delicacy. They will travel miles to find it by following it pungent aroma. So it's a lure to aid in propagation of the species. Because the seeds that are produced by the flowers can survive ingestion. This in turn causing many animals to spread it's seeds far and wide in their dung as they migrate.

If you meant that as, Know what you're talking about! Instead of dude I know what you're talking about. Boy have you ever picked the wrong person to accuse of being uniformed about Marijuana. :rofl:

I'm 77 years old. I've been smoking it for 68 years. When I was kid. Looking for marijuana didn't involve checking street corners and clubs. We went to the banks of the Potomac River where it grew wild in great abundance. Best of all it was free. Now would you like to discuss the religious history and uses of marijuana? How about the bio-mechanics of how it gets you high? Tired of talking about THC? How about talking about another wonderful compound Cannabidiol(CBD) instead? How about medical used of oxygen rich CBD in cellular defense during a stroke? You cells can leach the oxygen out of CBD the same way it does your blood. The conundrum is how to get it past the blockage to protect the cells. The answer is simple. To have it there before the stroke occurs. Prescribe it to people who are typically at risk of stroke. Pick a subject any subject on Marijuana and we'll talk. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
53. From Vote Hemp:
Myth: Smoking Industrial Hemp gets a person high.

Reality: The THC levels in Industrial Hemp are so low that no one could get high from smoking it. Moreover, hemp contains a relatively high percentage of another cannabinoid, CBD, that actually blocks the marijuana high. Hemp, it turns out, is not only not marijuana; it could be called "anti-marijuana".

Myth: Even though THC levels are low in hemp, the THC can be extracted and concentrated to produce a powerful drug.

Reality: Extracting THC from Industrial Hemp and further refining it to eliminate the preponderance of CBD would require such an expensive, hazardous, and time-consuming process that it is extremely unlikely anyone would ever attempt it, rather than simply obtaining high-THC marijuana instead.

http://www.votehemp.com/myths_facts.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lol, Paul sounds like a head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Um, I think you should read up on Stephen Baldwin before labelling him "liberal" actor.
His brother Alec (Alex?) is the liberal, Stephen is a Bible thumping right winger of the worst kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Re: "marijuana is a gateway drug" b-s
Nonsensical argument, but the main reason marijuana could possibly ever influence a person to move on to more powerful drugs is because we've put marijuana on the other side of the legality gate. Once you've used marijuana and see how harmless it is, one might then assume that other -- actually harmful -- drugs may be similarly misrepresented.

p.s. What is Baldwin's problem with calling Ron Paul "Mr. Paul" and "Ron"? Shouldn't he have been calling him "Representative Paul", "Congressman Paul", or just "Congressman"? Friggin' twit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Another point about gateway argument
They always say marijuana leads to hard drugs. (it hasn't for me in 30 years of occasional use)

The vast majority of cannabis users do not go on to hard drugs. But the opponents of legalization point to statistics that reveal that almost 100% of hard drug users smoked pot early on. Which sounds convincing on the face of it.

But one way to reverse engineer the answer, going by Baldwin's logic, is to say that drinking coffee (and having an addiction to caffeine) leads to hard drugs, since probably 100% of hard drug users were addicted to coffee earlier in their lives.

I mean the effects you get from caffeine and coke are probably more similar than pot and other hard drugs.

I better not talk too loudly or nutjobs like Stephen Baldwin might actually take this up.
I loves me my cup a joe in the morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Exactly. Past marijuana use might be a symptom of hard drug users ...
... but it's not a cause.

Great example re: coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. marijuana leads to terrible things such as
poetry, naps, laughter


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suede1 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. Exactly! Way should kids believe proven liars? And that's what happens when teenagers find out for
themselves they've been lied to about pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. Baldwin is proof of legalized insanity
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 02:04 PM by graywarrior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. WOW, Joy was the best here. . .
. . .Bravissima, Josephina Victoria "Joy" Behar (née Occhiuto)!

Hope Larry King picks Joy to replace him when he retires. . .she doesn't pull any punches.

And she doesn't hurt the eyes like Larry. . .LOL!

:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Funny thing, she's really good as Larry's guest host.
Unlike The View, where she's as dopey as anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yeah, this Baldwin was obviously dropped on his head. He isn't just a
McCain supporter, but he is in the same league as Dennis Miller (though obviously not as smart). I guess he thought if he couldn't be the famous one or the good-looking one or the other one (hehe) then he would go in a completely other direction. He has found God (that's great, I'm a Christian too-but he is always talking about it - him and Kirk Cameron - yuk, yuk) and now he wants to tell everybody how to live and where they are f...ing up. Reformed assholes just change their suits - that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnpaul Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. Good humor
Could they have picked a worse candidate to argue for marijuana prohibition? I think not. Baldwin came up with some of the most ridiculous excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmac Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. So DO THE EXPERIMENT. Legalize Drugs...
and see if it works. It will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. On this issue Paul is informed and articulate. Baldwin is an ass monkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #29
56. Thank you! Policy over politician, right there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
31. What's with Stephen Baldwin's eyes?
He looks under the effects of something. Ironic, considering what he is advocating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. He's high on Jesus!
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
48. Teh Stupid is strong with this one.
Stephen looked like he was in full Fred Thompson mode: straining to make a b.m. As a spokesperson for stupid fundaloons, he's da bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. Ron Paul reminds me of...
crazy guy on public transportation raving about this and that, convinced that he has a holy mission to bring truth to an unreceptive world. But he's at least partly on the ball sometimes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suede1 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. I see Steven Baldwin is consistent. He always likes his arguments fact free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
40. Did Stephen Baldwin Say Anything? I did not hear him say anything. His were moving, his mouth was
making noise, but nothing that he said was anything new. But, Bravo, on his knowing his lines. Bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's Alec who is the smart Baldwin.
By the way, poor Stephen... He didn't get a word in. All time went to Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onceuponalife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
46. Baldwin needs to get stoned
it might help him cure that "smirk face" problem he has.

I'm sure brother Daniel can supply him with some...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
47. Didn't Stephen Baldwin play a stoner in Bio-Dome
nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissPuddy Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
51. Less crime in Netherlands, British Columbia, etc. than USA
There are statistics that support crime and hardened drug use has not risen in areas with legalized marijuana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specialed Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
52. If been a pot fan since I was 13! :)
and I can safely say that alcohol is far worse. Far, far worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
54. Well the driving thing was just stupid.
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test will generally reveal impairment by Marijuana.
Part of any field sobriety test I have ever seen.

R.W. Baloh et al., Effect of Alcohol and Marijuana on Eye Movements, 50 Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 18 (Jan 1979).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC