Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eliot Spitzer with Fareed Zakaria on CNN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:54 PM
Original message
Eliot Spitzer with Fareed Zakaria on CNN
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 04:54 PM by cal04
 
Run time: 07:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We_XPDb1_38
 
Posted on YouTube: March 22, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: March 22, 2009
By DU Member: cal04
Views on DU: 1342
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw this. Thanx for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am dismayed that we seemed to have brought Spitzer down on such a personal issue.
I come down on the side of the civil libertarians here. I just don't know what he did wrong to his constituents. His private life was his own. He's a smart guy otherwise and his usefulness was cut short as a result of the scandal.

Do I like him as a man? No. If I were his wife I'd divorce him immediately. But as a public servant he was good and that is the standard I believe should be established and followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbird Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree with you on that.
Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. What he did was illegal
he prosecuted cases just like his. On the other hand I'd like to know who else was on that list that got a pass. It was a stupid thing, he was arrogant not expecting someone to try to get him for something. NY would sure be in a lot better state if he was still here though. I hope he is able to make a comeback of some sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. So as I'm watching this, I'm rocking in my backless swivel
as my head nods up and down and utterances emerge, "Yes, Eliot. YES, exactly that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it goes beyond 'discretion'
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 06:27 PM by tomm2thumbs
Sleeping around with someone on your wife may be one issue, but participating in illegal activities while claiming to be enforcing the law of a state is a throw down to your very soul. When someone isn't simply meeting girls at the office and having flings, but committing a crime and then claiming to be a law enforcer in the same breath, there is a problem.

I personally don't like what appears in the madam's book about Spitzer, that he didn't want to use a condom and “he’d be a real weasel about it, too" given that his wife's health is at risk and it sounds like he doesn't give a flip – just wants what he wants. Also in the book, the madam said he "was getting rough and too aggressive with the girls - repeatedly pressuring them to do things they didn’t want to do” - so it sounds as though this isn't some innocent fling he is having. Mistreating women is not a good sign to me if what I hear in that statement from the madam is indicative. Sounds like it was pretty bad if they had to finally tell him they didn't want his business any longer.

I don't expect those enforcing the law to be perfect, but to slap subpoenas on lawbreakers with one hand while secretly handing money over to prostitutes for sex on a weekly basis with the other is entirely objectionable - that person loses all credibility on 'honorable' at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. most of this is sensational crap..way too much irrelevant info...sorry
i dont give a hoot about any of that...they found his weakness...they took him down but not out....he knows who the players are and so should we...
what eliot spitzer did, cavorting with members of the oldest profession, while hypocritically, prosecuting..yep, that's illegal...in new york...having information about the "usual suspects" as he called them is more important than any of that...helping to point the way to prosecution of those criminals is crucial ...i dont see anyone else doing it or calling out goldman sachs..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R "Financial services should be a conduit..." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. A brilliant, deeply flawed man
P-O-W-E-R corrupting once again. What always amazes me about these guys is they think they'll never get caught. But I'm glad he's speaking out - he knows where some bodies are buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. I was discussing him last night with a group of friends. We were wondering who he
would have put into Hillary's Senate seat.

He had the goods on AIG and Wall St a long time ago and they knew it. That is one of the reasons he was targeted.
They brought him down with his own hubris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barbara2423 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Spitzer needs to get back into the game.
Was this his first time being charged with something? The gov't needs this type of expertise - somebody that can play hardball. Geither is too soft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree. This did seem to be his coming out
very informed and very clear in his description of what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC