Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Young Turks: Firefighters Let House Burn Down Over $75 - This Is A Problem For The Whole Country!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 11:32 PM
Original message
Young Turks: Firefighters Let House Burn Down Over $75 - This Is A Problem For The Whole Country!!!
 
Run time: 09:44
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJyjNiL4zZg
 
Posted on YouTube: October 06, 2010
By YouTube Member: TheYoungTurks
Views on YouTube: 305
 
Posted on DU: October 06, 2010
By DU Member: CherylK
Views on DU: 4301
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/04/firefighters-watch-as-hom_n_750272.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. So will we need to federalize fire departments across the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. No! PRIVATIZE the fire departments!
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 02:13 PM by breadandwine
If you didn't pay your fire bill, let YOUR apartment burn down! Who cares if there are other apartments right next to yours in YOUR building! They paid, you didn't!


Who the hell needs government!

That's socialism !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


When I hear the word "collective," I reach for mah gun !!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've been waiting for this clip to go up -- thanks for posting it.
I'm glad to see they have the entire rant on there. Cenk really nails it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. I bet the insurance company just loves that FD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BDavinciNY Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great Vid by Cenk
It is absolutely repugnant to allow a house to burn down because that guy didn't pay the $75 "fee" for fire protection. That South Fulton mayor is an extortionist and should be charged with extortion. It is unconscionable to allow the public to pay a fee on top of the taxes they pay for basic services like a fire department. Cenk was right this is the Rethugs and the Tea Party wet dream they love this and they want more of this until we really look like Somalia. Hey Rethugs: You said you wanted "smaller government" and your house was burned down,you have dirt or unmaintained roads, no streetlights and your food has been poisoned due to laxed regulation. How do you like your "smaller" government now?

:wtf: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I could be wrong but, it doesn't make any sense that they would charge a fee
on top of property taxes devoted to Fire/Rescue.

Does that county devote some portion of property taxes to fire? If so, then this guy has good grounds for a lawsuit.

My assumption is, they didn't collect any taxes for it. Otherwise, why a fee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Link under video.
That story contains other links for even more info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't see anything in the HuffPo story or any related stories that they paid for Fire/Rescue
in any way.

We do it with a biannual levee in our property taxes. You don't get to go a la carte here. Don't pay? Lose your home.
If none of his property taxes go to that fire department, welp.

I agree that going a la carte on these services isn't a good idea, because people will make poor decisions, but my county's solution has consequences as well, including leaving people homeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. The county's entire expenditure on Fire & Rescue is $12,000. To put out grass & car
fires in "certain" areas.

Neighboring counties spend an average of $288K.

Page 18:

http://troy.troytn.com/Obion%20County%20Fire%20Department%20Presentation%20Presented%20to%20the%20County%20Commission.pdf

There is no money spent on residential fire protection whatsoever.

The county opted to let individuals in the unincorporated county choose to subscribe to a city fire service -- or not, as they saw fit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janewin Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Russian TV
Reported that this guys house caught on fire 3 yrs ago and an exception was made for him, also he was reminded in August to pay for his fire fees. All indications shows that this guy knew exactly what the consequences for his action was. On Keith Olberman's show he said that 3 other houses were allowed to burn because they did not pay this fee. I find it very hard to sympathize with this man's cause. These people vote for politicians who will give them lower and lower taxes and limited govt and these guys actually delivered. This a lesson that needs to be learnt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. No. The county assesses NO tax for fire protection. The county spends
$12,000 per year to put out grass & car fires in "certain areas". That's it. That's its entire expenditure for fire service. It doesn't have any arrangement for residential fires. It's twice shot down proposals for a volunteer fire service.

Neighboring counties spend an average of $288K for fire protection.

The county, in its wisdom, voted to allow its 15,000 unincorporated residents to decide, as individuals, to contract with city fire departments -- or not.

The cities in question have an average population of 2000 people. The smallest is 360 people. Somehow they manage to fund a city fire department -- which county residents think they're entitled to free-ride on.

75% of all fire calls come from the unincorporated county.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wally Pipp Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
49. Rest of the story. . .
I got the impression from the video clip that the Cranecks lived in a town next to South Fulton and that the town they lived in did not have a Fire Department. Apparently their township had an arrangement with its larger neighbor for fire protection, so long as its residents payed up their $75.

It is prohibitively expensive for these small towns to run emergency services like these. A lot of these towns depend upon federal and state grants to help cover these costs, on top of the property taxes residents already pay. When the federal block grants to states fell victim to federal budget cuts over the last approximately 16 years, this is the predictable result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #49
67. Our small town, which has approx. 3,000 year round residents
has a volunteer FD. They have the latest equipment and ongoing training for their members. They raise funds by putting on events that attract people from the community and from other communities. A Fire Department Fair, an annual Barbecue which attracts thousands each year. The firefighters do the cooking and the cleanup along with their family members.

They also go door to door to get donations each year. But if someone doesn't donate or participate in any of the events to raise funds, it doesn't matter to them. All fires are extinguished. It would be unthinkable for them not to put out a fire. Also, if the fire is beyond their capabilities, neighboring FDs will come to help.

There is absolutely no exuse for what happened to that house. All it takes is a little planning as we all know there are always going to be some who will not want to contribute, that should not be a death sentence. It benefits everyone when the goal is to protect the community in general.

Three dogs and a cat died in that fire. That was unconscienable. If the homeowner is irresponsible, that doesn't mean the FD and elected officials have to be also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
61. That's my question
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 11:15 PM by droidamus2
Wouldn't the normal way to do this be for the county, paid through whatever taxes they collect, to negotiate with the town to provide fire protection to county residents. Especially if the county isn't willing to pay to establish their own fire departments. Is it easier for the mayor to extort money from individuals where he can just decide that you have to pay $75 take or leave it. How much you wanna bet that now they have shown everybody what happens if you don't pay the fee will go up next year, and the year after that and the year after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. South fulton is a town of 2500 people. Its residents pay taxes to fund fire protection
inside the city.

That is all the city's fire department is responsible for.

County residents DON'T PAY TAXES TO FUND THE CITY'S FIRE DEPARTMENT. THE FEE IS THE ONLY PAYMENT.

There are 15,000 residents in the unincorporated county.

The county commissioners voted for this policy of individual choice rather than to tax everyone and contract with the cities as a body.

Cenk's rant is bullshit & spin.

Both the libs & the cons are spinning bigtime -- & trying to dupe the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. His 'spin' is spot on
By not putting the fire out immediately they threatened the safety of everyone else in the area.
Had the wind gusted up and blown the fire in several different directions you could have had a serious fire that threatened the lives and property of everyone around there -- check out the wildfires that hit California to see how that happens.

By their logic, and the logic you are supporting, if they were a police force that had the same policy 75 bucks and their house was being robbed the police wouldn't have to do anything because they hadn't paid the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Your logic is that a small town should subsidize fire service for a larger, richer county
whose residents have for more than 20 years refused to tax themselves to pay for fire service while making 75% of all fire calls the city receives.

Your logic is that the city should bankrupt itself.

2,500 people in south fulton.

15,000 people in the unincorporated county.

under the previous policy when the city responded to every call & charged after the fact, more than half those served never paid, and the county refused to assess any taxes so that payment would be guaranteed.

when the city asked for a guarantee of payment, this is the policy the county voted for after two years of negotiations.

and after shooting down two proposals to fund a county volunteer fire service.

it's unworkable, but your logic insists that the city magically make it work by continuing to come to every fire call, exactly as before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveMajority Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Yeah, nothing to do with "privatized," but WHO CARES?... I certainlly don't :-)
I have no problem with the video, or the way MSNBC covered it. The story can be spun to get an important anti-privatization point across. It fits the meta-narrative very well. If this gets it into peoples heads how dangerous the "tea party" ideals are than I'm all for it.

But in this actual, specific case? This is just a county/town tax issue. Insofar as it translates into a national issue, it's an issue of federalism, i.e. should fire services be a blanket national service. I think the optimal solution would be a bill stipulating that all areas MUST have fire service and pay the associated tax to whichever municipality provides it.

Yeah though, it's got jack to do with privatization. You could nationalize every company in the entire country and still have this sort of bureaucratic/funding screw up. Still though, good video on the part of TYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAmused Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. I think it is more Hannah
Hannah, the info I found put the county population at 33,000. I have lived near that area. South Fulton is no a wealthy place at all. Thanks for your posts. It is great someone responding here that has both read and done their own research before screeching from their respective rooftop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. I can't give you a specific example of that scenario with the police
but a similar 'injustice' can be reviewed in Gonzales vs. Castle Rock.

Mother called and called and called for the police to come do something to protect her and her family, but abusive ex hubby was 'not overdue' out with the kids, and all the threatening calls he had made to her weren't a material threat, despite him telling her over and over he'd kill her when he got there.

Long story short, the police ignored her until it was too late to do anything but draw chalk outlines, and the Supreme Court held they couldn't be liable for failure to protect her, that they had no duty to protect her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. that case has nothing to do with payment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. + 1
Can not believe people are trying to defend this BS!!!

:wtf: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. +!

You said it, Cheryl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julian09 Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. What they are responible for
Where I come CT from we have mutual aid from several nearby towns, even if we only pay taxes in one of those towns.
What would happen if a school or factory had a fire in this godforsaken place. Letting annimals suffer and die at the altar of taxation, which the TP loons are against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. there is no such "mutual aid" between this county & the city, because the county HAS NO FIRE DEPART-
MENT.

BECAUSE THEY'VE REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO FUND ONE.

The "aid" has gone all one way for decades; the city paid to put out the county's fires.

Even though the county is more populous & has a higher median income than the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boycottfaux Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. INHUMANE
There were FIVE ANIMALS inside that house the fire department
did not save.  They all died . .

What if there were HUMAN BEINGS inside that house?  You okay
with this inhumanity because you seek revenge because these
people didn't ante up their fee???

How much blood is enough for 'you people'????

Many of 'you people' believe in Jesus, well, what will you say
when you get to St. Peter's Gates???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Boycottfaux, that doesn't seem to matter one bit to
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 02:34 PM by Kajsa
a few of the responders here!

They are soooo convinced that "Cenk is full of shit"
that TO HELL with the animals, the irreplaceable photos
and family heirlooms,the lose of the house,etc.

" this guy isn't hurting".

My God!!!
The Cenk haters are out in full force, here.

FU*K the family- "Cenk is full of shit"
they say.

I have lost all respect for more than one poster here
I previously thought had it together-NOT!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAmused Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. Wonder why?
Because some of us actually read the article, unlike you.

Wow, my ignore list is getting full.

As we say in computer support...RTFM !!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. You again,
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 07:32 PM by Kajsa
Mr. Privating?

RTFA!
And listen to what Cenk has to say.

Please, PLEASE put me on your ignore list.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. How did you miss all the other posts

here mentioning "privating" ?
There are a bunch here.

Why am I the lucky recipient of your witty charm?

Again, Please with the Ignore list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
68. Actually the fire department specifically stated they would go in if there was a human
at risk.

With the slow speed of the fire's progression, I lay the animal deaths at the owner's feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #68
72. Of course you do.
Edited on Thu Oct-07-10 10:45 AM by Kajsa
FDs NEVER put out fires unless the homeowner has paid a fee
for their services now, do they?

And you never,never see a fireman rescuing an animal
from a horrible, painful death.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hold on now.
Where I live, EMS/Fire/Police comes out of my property taxes. I don't HAVE the option not to pay for the Fire services. (which the homeowner in question knowingly chose) If I don't pay, the state takes my house and auctions it off to pay my unpaid taxes. (Granted I get any proceeds over the value of my house)

So, I don't see this $75 fee instead of property tax thing as a huge issue. Not until I see Cenk get this angry over some family kicked from their home for failure to pay property taxes. It's traumatic to lose your house in a fire in a short period of time like this, but the owner knew and chose not to pay. Losing your house over a period of time because you couldn't pay your property taxes isn't much better. The county sherriff comes and kicks you out and throws your stuff out on the street. Not better.

The thing with the pets sucks, if true. I don't understand why the family couldn't have gotten the pets out, if it 'started' small in two barrels away from the house though. But I assume there will be more info coming. Probably a lot about this story we don't know yet.



Side thought, I am willing to bet any homeowners insurance this guy had is going to get out of it, since he didn't pay the fire service. I would be shocked if they don't find a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. the homeowner has said his policy will pay for a new home. he's not hurting.
cenk's take is bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I agree, but...
Let's see if there's an exception in his fire policy for him not opting into fire protection services.

100 or so years ago, this was common, and I suspect there's an oft-overlooked provision somewhere in the insurance policy. I suspect this is going to be the most expensive $75 that homeowner ever 'saved'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. i think he pays a premium because there's no fire service. he had a fire before.
if the insurance company refuses to pay, what do you bet he'll come begging for someone to "charitably" buy him a new house because those mean firemen wouldn't put out his fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. I can't KNR this enough!!! Bravo!
KNR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. K & R. People defending this need to pay attention.
It took TWO HOURS, let me repeat that TWO HOURS for this fire to spread to the family's house, and even longer to spread to the neighbor's property. If that neighbor hadn't paid, I guess the fire would have continued to spread and burn until it hit a "subscriber's" property. That is totally f'ed up and just plain STUPID.

We know from other reports that there were drought conditions in the area. This could have been a huge disaster requiring the state to step in. But let's teach that homeowner a lesson and potentially put the entire f'ing county at risk. Wow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cannondale Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. Lets apply that "Logic" to Beck
His accountant forgets to pay his insurance. Beck's house is on fire. What do you think happens?

OF COURSE Beck's house is saved. Safety nets for me but not for thee. "But I mailed the check... you never received it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. "The firefighters are just doing what they're told to do."
Isn't that what the Germans said during WWII?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. kick and recommend!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. Great example of "privatizing"
public services.

Yeah, that worked out well, didn't it?!?
:sarcasm:

K&R, a thousand times!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. What in the hell

is "Privating" ?

Yes, I did read it, did you?

And you are asking me if I can read.

God!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAmused Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Yes you are absolutely right
Typing mistakes are the same as lack of logic and misuse of facts. Please point to anywhere you found that this fire department is privatized.

And I will put you ignore, but for now you are too much fun to play with.



I used to be disgusted, now I'm
JustAmused
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #56
73. Logic? Facts?
You claim to have them in your posts?
Where?

What article did you read?

The one on the link stated,

The South Fulton firefighters did show up and managed to save a neighbor's field. The neighbor had paid the fee. But they would provide no heroics for the Cranicks. A local news report shows them climbing back on their trucks, flames still dancing over what was once the family's home.

The event was dubbed "pay for spray" by MSNBC host Keith Olbermann. It's a chilling vision of what could play out in a third world America, where paying taxes isn't enough to cover basic services. Fire protection, it turns out, is a privilege in some communities. On Monday's show, Olbermann railed against the larger implications the incident, calling it "a look now into the America envisioned by the tea party ... just a preview of what would come in a kind of a la carte government."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. Let's not lose sight of the big picture.
If you're being robbed and assaulted the cops can worry about your unpaid local/state taxes later AFTER they stop the assault/robbery.

And as another poster pointed out, an additional emergency fee can be charged later if the issue is simply money. Besides which the family repeatedly offered to pay (more than $75) when they called 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. Very good points, IHNB!
Thank you! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Cenk, you're full of shit.
There is a community; the city of South Fulton. Those citizens pooled their meager finances to finance their public safety.

The adjacent county has decided that in order to create their libertarian paradise, it's more lucrative to enable encourage their comparatively affluent citizens to exploit the charity of the poor town of South Fulton.

"Grab a hose"? Bullshit. It's not their hose, it's not their firetruck and it's not their own personal liability they assume. All of those things belong to the citizens of South Fulton. It isn't their choice to make.

It is a problem for the whole country, but your entire framing of the issue promulgates the problem; The problem isn't a lack of charity on the part of the mayor / fire department / citizens of South Fulton, the problem is the complete lack of human ethics shown by those running the county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODem75 Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
60. Then you would be behaving like a libertarian.
"It's ours, you didn't pay for it so why should we help." The right thing to do is always help your fellow man no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm glad cenk called bullshit on the firefighters. Their actions were criminal and cowardly.
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 01:59 PM by 20score
And pointing out that he didn't pay may be true, but it's irrelevant.

There is no excuse for what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. Cenk displays the appropriate level of passion for this.
It should make us all mad as hell...
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julian09 Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. If delinquint on taxes
Do police watch crime happen to that person or throw their kids out of school, blockaid their driveway so they can't use public roads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. the South Fulton FD isn't responsible for this homeowner clown.
He's probably a Republican and Teabagger who hates the government. South Fulton isn't responsible for putting out a fire out of their jurisdiction any more than they are responsible for putting out a fire in Memphis or New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
64. Did you even watch the video?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
39. Should the Fulton Fire Dept. just charge a huge fee for this kind of emergency?
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 04:00 PM by bigmonkey
Pay the $75 ahead of time, we'll come when called. Don't pay, and call us in an emergency- huge fee, more than enough to cover the costs of the overhead.

Then they can actually put out the fires, which was the point in the first place.

(edit title to at "this")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. They did.......to this same family........3 years ago.......they never paid
The family is nothing but a bunch of scofflaws. They have money, they own multiple homes in the county, they recieve farm subsidies from 2 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #41
69. Frankly, they smell like republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
40. This IS the Result of Privatization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. No it's not
It's the result of the County demanding they not have a fire service. It's Ayn Rand government in action. It's a damn shame that it takes a house to burn down to make them realize the error of their ways. But I bet the vote will still be 19-1 to not have a fire department in ther County, because somehow they think it's the outside fire department's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. that's what I meant by Privatization... that's the agenda isn't it?
take from publicly funded services and give it to private interests. It didn't work out the way these idiots thought it would.

"It's Ayn Rand government in action" - it sure is and it's a failure as most with a brain can figure out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
43. OK I am a little bit lost...
I understand the scenario and the passion, what I don't understand is that we have a Democratic controlled Congress and a Democrat in the White House and this happened. Isn't this exactly what was supposed to be changed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NICO9000 Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
44. Cenk's best bit ever?
He hits every single point I've thought of after hearing about this travesty. God forbid there was a child in there who burned to death. Think Goldberg and his scumbag ilk would still be defending the status quo here? Sadly, probably so.

Cenk is especially right-on slamming the firefighters themselves. They have a duty to put out fires, period. Fuck this "just following orders" crap. How can they live with themselves?

This country is quickly becoming a nightmare and I really am at wit's end on what to do. I was born in Montreal and have lived my whole life in. So. California, but trying to get dual citizenship is looking better and better with each passing day. I really don't want to stay in a country as men as this one has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat0986 Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. Not quite his best, but close to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
55. Feudal Lords who decide your fate while you watch them? Or Democracy. You have to use language to
keep it.  And the way you do that is to keep your word.

It is hard.  But doable. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Here. Have some San Francisco Style Patti Smith from Mr. Hellman's event. It will help you.
Patti Smith in Golden Gate Park (behind a fence, far away, but was able to zoom into her non verbal

Enjoy... Oh and please note: lots and lots of people getting along and aligned just fine.

You can do it too. Tap in.
Another group, on October 10, 2010 will hold a free collective day dedicated to collective thought
and regeneration.

I think this will be a dna moment. Meaning: if you join in you will get the energy that will surge
the biology.. its all biology and physics. Take those two science courses if you have any brains at all.
Take them even if you don't think you have brains. You might discover its a muscle! It grows with use.

Patti can kick butt on inspiration. She models freedom for me.

She says: "be happy, work hard, live well" I totally agree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodyM Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
59. The homeowner had
adequate opportunities to participate at a small cost to him to protect his home against a very unlikely happening. He chose to weight the cost against the probabilities and decided not to participate. He made the decision not to cover his home. The fire fighters responded as the homeowner had decided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. Did you even watch the video?
"Sickening."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #63
70. Yes, the video is missing a significant quantity of relevant information.
Including that this happened to the homeowner 3 years prior, same result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. I know all that stuff. Including city/county fire dept. relationship history.
Edited on Thu Oct-07-10 12:55 AM by Hissyspit
Cenk is spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
62. Beautiful rant. I agree with everything he says.
If my neighbor's house was on fire, I'd be there in a heartbeat with every fire extinguisher I own. Wouldn't matter who he was, whether he said hello to me that morning, or who he voted for last fall.

I'm going to be checking with my local volunteer fire dept (to which I make a voluntary contribution every spring) and see what their policy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
65. Mixed feelings on this one though not where human lives are involved.
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 11:34 PM by crim son
But I do have to wonder what went on in the homeowners' heads when they opted out of fire protection. First, let me say that it is possible I'd do the same thing in their situation and I'd make that decision the same way they did, under the assumption that I wouldn't have to worry about fire. And I might be wrong: this is a fine example of a lesson painfully learned.

It cannot be denied that the folks in question made a choice and the potential consequences of that choice were pretty damned clear; the whole situation brings to mind the conservative argument against public services i.e. those who are most vehemently opposed are the same people who assume they'll never need to apply for public assistance. What is the difference in the situation being discussed, assuming we all understand that most of us never have to think about paying a separate fee for fire service, and assuming that no human beings were trapped inside the house and would perish without the help of the fire department (I cannot imagine a situation where these people would be left to die), and the conservative argument that we are all ultimately personally responsible for the choices we make? And in more liberal terms, the family was asked to pay its fair share and refused. Is there not something wrong with that, again making the assumption that $75 bucks wouldn't put them over the edge financially? Progressives know that social benefits are not free.

As I said, I'm torn but there is something to be said for personal responsibility. Or is there not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
66. Awesome Rant!
I'm amazed at how hard hearted some 'progressives' are at DU lately.
The man and his neighbor had open checkbooks and were willing to pay whatever needed to be paid right then to have the fire put out.
The FD and South Fulton wanted to make an example of the guy, which is exactly what they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
74. What a volunteer firefighter has to say,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. That was very good. Unfortunately, too late to rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. I know, 20score!
I was too late, also.
:(

Thanks!

:) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
77. HUGE K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC