Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Birthers: Is President Obama a US citizen according to US law?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
gadjitfreek Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 05:23 PM
Original message
Birthers: Is President Obama a US citizen according to US law?
 
Run time: 03:04
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KWp_a95so8
 
Posted on YouTube: April 18, 2011
By YouTube Member: Cry4A10Tion
Views on YouTube: 2
 
Posted on DU: April 18, 2011
By DU Member: gadjitfreek
Views on DU: 1926
 
Look it up for yourself. U.S. Code Title 8, Chapter 12, Subchapter III, Part 1, section 1401.g. I elaborate here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are the birthers going to try to deport Mitt Romney? His dad was born in Mexico! ;)
I haven't heard the birthers or the folks in Arizona hollering that Mitt is 'an anchor baby' yet :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gadjitfreek Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's because Romney...
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 05:33 PM by gadjitfreek
..."looks like them", not a scary black man with a Muslim-sounding name. If President Obama had been LeRoy Johnson or Terrence Wilks he would have had some other nonsense thrown his way to try to discredit and dehumanize him. I don't agree with a lot of what our President has done...he's been strong on rhetoric and weak on action...but this birther stuff is just ridiculous and patently racist in nature. No way around it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. his mother was american.... so even if he were born in kenya or any other country
he would still be american. mccain was born in panama...... so is he not american? the fact that people are still discussing it is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I Think "The Donald" has a new gal pal......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank You!
My parents are tea-partying birthers. Really bugs me too as my hubby is from Ireland. I once asked my mom if she was worried my son wasn't a citizen. I mean she's never seen his birth certificate either. :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auntsue Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. OMG - His MOTHER is a citizen
What else is necessary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. according to US law that should be enough even if he was born in Kenya
according to http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-9679.html">INA 301 G)

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288) by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. The birther question is not if Obama is a citizen or not
It is whether or not he is a natural born citizen as the constitution requires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gadjitfreek Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This section deals with that very issue.
He IS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. A natural born citizen is any citizen who didn't have to be naturalized.
No one born to a citizen or born in the U.S. needs to be naturalized -- they are all natural born citizens according to previous SCOTUS rulings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:10 PM
Original message
Dupe
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 06:10 PM by AsahinaKimi
 
Run time: 03:04
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KWp_a95so8
 
Posted on YouTube: April 18, 2011
By YouTube Member: Cry4A10Tion
Views on YouTube: 2
 
Posted on DU: April 18, 2011
By DU Member: AsahinaKimi
Views on DU: 1926
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just off the top of my head..
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 06:11 PM by AsahinaKimi
I would conclude that this birther nonsense is just the top layer of racism. Just a guess... and an opinion. (This from someone who like Obama, was born in the United States, whose father was a Japanese National, and whose Mother (Korean/Japanese) was born in NEW YORK F'KIN CITY!! :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Try reading the operative section as it stood in 1961

It's been amended since then. The five year requirement used to apply entirely to five years after the age of 14.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. doesn't apply anymore
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288) by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This provison shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Do you know what "this proviso" means?
The sentence beginning with "This proviso" is a reference back only to the sentence beginning "Provided".

The relation back to 1952 only applies in the circumstances specified in the sentence which says:

"Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288) by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph."

The next sentence starts with "This proviso (i.e. that big long sentence starting with "provided") shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date."

Only the condition in the proviso is dated back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. New version applies to everyone born after 12/24/52, which includes Obama.
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 07:05 PM by pnwmom


according to INA 301 G)

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288) by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Hon, "THIS PROVISO" refers only to the sentence beginning "Provided"

None of the conditions of which would be satisfied (in the idiotic hypothetical of a Kenyan birth).

You are not reading it right. It is not generally applicable back to 1952, but only applicable under the conditions stated in the proviso immediately preceding that sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. delete / wrong spot
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 11:39 PM by jberryhill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. "Used to apply" and now "Does not apply"
Only two years past the age of 14 is required. There is no stipulation in the amendment that the new law only affects those born after the law takes place. In contrast, it simply redefines the original law so as to broaden its scope -for ALL people.

Again, we know the law applies to all people, because the law does not specify that it is limited to any certain age group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks. This is the first time I've seen or read this.
Although it of course doesn't change the fact that Obama WAS born in Hawaii!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I went through this
I was at the time of the birth of our son an alien married to a US citizen abroad. Our son was born in Hungary with a Hungarian birth certificate: he is a natural born US citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. He certainly is! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. When some birther questions Obama's birth, I retaliate with the fact
that Panama John McCain wasn't born in the US, and it says it on his birth certificate. So if they are going to complain about Obama, they should be complaining about McCain as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. A lot of teabaggers hate McCain, so they wouldn't care
if this interpretation excluded him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
23. Why is this issue so important to the birthers?
My thought is that besides being racists, the birthers believe that if they can prove Obama is not legally the president it rolls back the clock to his inauguration. Everything he has done since he took the oath of office will be null and void, and we'll return to the "good old days" of GWB.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoIsNumberNone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. Just as I've been saying since day 1 of this birther crap
The birthers are trying to make out like "Natural Born Citizen" means something different when one is running for President. It means he was born a citizen- not naturalized. GET OVER IT BIRTHER MORONS! FACE FACTS: YOU LOST THE ELECTION!

I'd also point out that in 2001 there were Republicans who were actually talking about amending the Constitution so that Arnold Schwarzenegger would be able to run for President in 2008. Where were the birthers then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC