|
Let's take a look at their books. Let's take a look at all their papers. They get to know everything about us before they even decide if they will insure us. Before we have the honor of giving them our hard earned money we must give them our most private information. Yet when we want to make a claim, when we want to take a look at how they make decision that directly influence our lives and our deaths they claim "privacy is needed to keep companies competitive."
The insurance companies have been systematically using "secret" "McKinsey" documents in order to redefine ways in which they can deny claims. To be open and honest is no longer a good company model. Yous are not in good hand with these companies and you need to check out some information being litigated in the state of Seattle. Check out www.king5.com and check under the "McKinsey Documents."
If one large insurance company is using this new "McKinsey" insurance business template then the chances are and the %payout will tell many of the rest of them are as well. If one segment of the industry, i.e. car insurance, is using this tactic, what do you suppose the probability is that the rest of the insurance company segments (health, home, etc..) are using this?
Is it fair to say this ? After all I'm using probability not straight facts and direct evidence. Then again we are talking about the insurance industry and their lives work is statistics. How could these liars figure without the figures with which to lie.
This "terror" cry of "socialized" medicine and "slippery slope" is just the Super Privatizer's ( my new name for the group of individuals who feel everything should be done by the private industry including , police, army, crowd control, evacuation procedures... are you scared yet) propaganda language used, until now, quite effectively to keep people from questioning their Machiavellian techniques, rules, roles, and ultimate plans.
Now are you afraid?
You should be.
But It's not too late. Yet.
|