Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

man facing 75 years for recording ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
bluebuzzard Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:16 AM
Original message
man facing 75 years for recording ...
 
Run time: 07:16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5AMN33aQYo
 
Posted on YouTube: August 30, 2011
By YouTube Member: MrGlasgowTruther4U
Views on YouTube: 303
 
Posted on DU: August 31, 2011
By DU Member: bluebuzzard
Views on DU: 6341
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recording police making arrests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PonyJon Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. So "average man" is finally waking up to nazi police state America! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. if you cannot shoot video, just shoot the abusive cops
75 years for recording is less than you risk for murder so why shoot video when you can just shoot a gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mumblefratz Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Actually if you listen carefully ...
this report only mentions that recording *audio* of the police is against the law in Illinois and that if you recorded video without audio then that would not be against the law. Clearly this is the case if this is merely an interpretation of old wiretap laws.

That doesn't mean that it's the same in all states that have these laws but at least from the information given in this report that's what you have to conclude about the Illinois law.

Of course I think that police departments should welcome such recordings since if they've done nothing wrong a recording would only bolster their claims and if someone has done something wrong then it helps get rid of a dirty cop. But I guess it's human nature to protect your own even if your own is doing something wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. in chicago lots of cops are in gangs too and dont want audio
of all the drug and gun dealing they do, cops in chicago can get you the best cocaine, the best heroin, the best street guns and at the best prices, i have seen it first hand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not just in Chicago.
When I was younger (80's) it was well known that the "cops" had the best dope. They confiscated it and many of them loved to party. They would also use it to coerce sex and who knows what else.

We had friends we had grown up with who became policeman, the real party usually began after they came. They had the best dope and could always get you stolen merchandise cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. We knew a Cleveland Cop exactly like that.
This clown lived right across the street from us. He always had confiscated stereos and electronics. He had no problem letting us know how corrupt he was. He was proud of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WDIM Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. That law is against the law
We always have the right to witness and record our law enforcement officers doing their job.
If the court doesn't recognize natural rights and needs the constitution.
It is a violation of freedom of press or media. If the man was publishing his videos even online he is part of the press or media.
So basically that would be saying that news reporters can't record the officers.

Why doesn't Chicago news bust this stuff like cops in gangs? Where are the investigative reporters??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. Didn't a federal court just rule on such a case--in favor of
citizens' right to record and disseminate evidence about the way government and police authority is wielded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. So we have BECOME Russia and China. What next? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. i am from chicago and i know why this law exists
many chicago police officers are in gangs too. i saw a chicago cop in uniform who was a BGD drop off a kilo of cocaine to his allied SD gang, he bragged that he just stole it from the latin kings. he gave the gang 10 hours to get his money plus gave us a pound of weed for free so we boiled up the crack, the shorties (10 to 12 year olds) went and sold the crack and the cop, still in uniform, picked up thousands of dollars in cash at the end of his shift, you cannot expect the cops to want videos of that kind of shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. HIghly recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Don't these same officers have recording devices
mounted on their vehicles to record arrests (which they know how to avoid)? Can the arrested citizens press charges if the police record them? This is just to enable a police state. We have no rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. in our state
they can turn them off. even when the lights are turned on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. It's "legal" for cops to record citizens, just not the other way around.
it said that in the video, as one of the many sad ironies in play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Everyone incorporate yourself
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 08:28 AM by JJW
Corporation, get all a person's rights and never get sent to jail. Corporation's CEOs are the worst criminals. They get paid to be criminals.

Nothing happens if a corporation's security camera video tape and audio record a cop. There is no justice when everyone is not equal under the law.

What are you doing today, to take back your country, stolen by greedy criminal corporations, political scumbags, and unethical justices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. IM assuming all media outletts get permission ?
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 09:45 AM by iamthebandfanman
to show police in video at every crime scene they report on?

if not, terrible doudle standard.

that means news agency are guilty of it every time they record a wreck being investigated or any other crime being investigated when they do on scene reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedom fighter jh Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. Yes, if not, double standard
And if so, violation of constitutional right to a free press.

The press if truly free only if you don't have to be a member of the MSM to be considered press. Recording police action and posting it on YouTube has got to be protected by the First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. Protect police
These statutes that are rigged to "protect police" from public scrutiny and criminal prosecution are going to boomerang on them and have the opposite effect. People are going to mistrust and dislike the police if cops are seen as using shield laws to engage in illegal behavior without accountability.

Remember http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastille_Day">what happened on the 14th of July, 1789.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Here is the prosecutor's info:
STATE'S ATTORNEY (R) THOMAS R. WISEMAN 618-546-1505
4-YR TERM Crawford County Courthouse
2008-2012 105 Douglas St
Robinson IL 62454

They won't tell me if the criminal in question pulled off a secret genocide in Indiana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. bitch hung up on me once i said i wasnt happy with the 75 years
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 11:50 AM by reggie the dog
for filming the cop, 10 seconds before they hung up; i hate pigs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. By the time I called, the receptionist had her lines of BS prepared.
Something about "you'll need to put your concerns in writing and mail it to our office" ... and ... "Oh that report is inaccurate, there is no 75 year sentence being considered" ... blah blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xocet Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here is why they prefer not to be recorded (possibly NSFW):
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. So what about these videos then?
If the law is the law, then, why are not all these police videos (with audio) not landing the police who recorded them in jail for 75 years? Here is just one example of thousands: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exn8yVcnt1o

Also, what about "freedom of the press"? Doesn't the constitution trump all other law?

I'm just saying....


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamsterDem Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is absolutely sickening. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atheistprogress Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Every uniformed police officer
needs a camera attached to his or her head. That way when they beat a suspect, the courts can have proof if it was excessive or just an abuse of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Barring these videos is suborning evidence.
If I understand this newscast correctly, the man who was arrested had a court hearing in which he wanted a reporter to be present, but no reporter was permitted.

The police can easily bar evidence of criminal behavior on their own parts with these laws.

Seems to me the law gives a license to the obstruction of justice in any case against the officers.

Certainly, the filming and videotaping should be permitted in any public area.

Could he have obtained an injunction to require the court to have a reporter present during his hearing? (Assuming that I am correct about that being the issue.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. They're afraid of us. - K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
free420 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Born in Robinson
and long time citizen of Crawford County IL. They have always been one of the most corrupt counties around. We are famous for it. Some of the stuff they have pulled on the citizens over the last 20 years is inconceivable. The police here can get away with anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. This really is sick shit. Fucking 3rd world police state. Oh, and then
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 10:51 PM by scentopine
they'll wonder why there are goddamn riots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. and of course the chickenshit Assistant DA wouldn't do an interview.
Fucking fascist cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. good cops have nothing to fear and everything to gain from a video recording.
that being said, bad cops have everything to fear and nothing to gain from a video recording.

To think this is already illegal in over 1/4 of the states is shameful. What country is this? If it's in public, recording people doing what you believe to be illegal acts should be anything but illegal.


http://www.cafepress.com/barackobama12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
30.  Judge described audio recordings of NYPD precinct roll-calls presented by plaintiffs “smoking gun"
Judge Scheindlin concluded that the statistical evidence submitted by the plaintiffs raises factual questions “as to whether the NYPD’s stop and frisk policies have had a disparate impact in the form of a widespread pattern of race-based stops,” and that supposed recent corrective action by the NYPD is not enough at this point “to negate the inference that intentional discrimination was the City’s standard operating procedure.” In addition, the Judge described audio recordings of NYPD precinct roll-calls presented by plaintiffs as “smoking gun” evidence that creates “a triable issue of fact as to whether NYPD supervisors have a custom or practice of imposing quotas on officer activity, and whether such quotas can be said to be the ‘moving force’ behind widespread suspicionless stops.” http://www.ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/judge-allows-lawsuit-challenging-nypd%2526%2523039%3Bs-stop-and-frisk-policy-move-forward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC