Hillary's Double Talk: MSNBC Debate

[ultraist]

Run time: 04:38 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyulRo6WTLU   Posted on YouTube: October 31, 2007 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: October 31, 2007 By DU Member: ultraist Views on DU: 1324

 

Double Talk? You decide.

[okamichan13]

1. Yep n/t

[Islander Expat]

2. Politics = the entertainment division of the military industrial complex

Gawd could it ever be more fucking obvious?

[lumpy]

3. Dodd got it right by saying driver's licenses for illegals

would be a bureaucratic nightmare. Clinton pointed out there would be three categories for issuing drivers licenses. Sounds like something Dubya would support. Clinton appears to be supporting desperate measures to solve problems. She is 'all over the place' regarding the issues. Her indecisiveness about Iran is enough to turn me off.

[chris9]

11. Tempest in a teapot?

Is this really an issue voters outside New York state care about? Maybe there's a method to her madness. She probably knows what she is doing? Just a thought. Her husband is Bill Clinton. She is not stupid. Why not save lives on NY roads by testing everyone that drives? Let me know if I am just totally wrong, but she seems ruthless enough to be prez.:toast:

[benny05]

4. I decided

it is double talk. She hasn't had a chance to get her poll together on this one. In fairness, she was knowledgeable about Spitzer's proposal, but as usual, she can't decide without more consensus or polls.

[Catchawave]

5. The GOP would crush her :(

[benny05]

6. Well, she's having some adjustments

If she cannot compete in the Primaries, she cannot compete in the GE. Mrs. Clinton forgets she is in a primary.

[ultraist]

10. I agree. The GOP would crush Hillary

Also, she would drag down the ticket for Dems in every state. We can't afford to lose seats in Congress and really any other races in 08.

[ashlarah]

7. Triple talk and deliberate obfuscation

Anything to avoid the accountability that comes with transparency. We deserve clarity. We should insist upon it. With John Edwards, we will get candidness and clarity without having to constantly battle for it because he knows the president is accountable to the people. Why would we instead choose someone who has that principle distorted into a notion that the people are accountable to to an oligarch with a misplaced sense of entitlement.

[lumpy]

8. Yay verily

thank you

[rAVES]

9. Simply aweful..

[zazzle]

13. Hillary was so awful - that she released a video yesterday implying she was a "victim"

of all those mean Democratic candidates hammering her. BAWAAAAAAAAA!!!!
Jeeeez! if she can't handle the heat from Dems - she sure won't be able to handle it from Repubs!

[BREMPRO]

12. i wholheartedly agree with Edwards, I want the TRUTH, not hillary-talk.

given the history, obvious danger here of the GOP branding her as a flip-flopper, indecisive, pandering...