Rachel Maddow lays out the differences in the three top Democratic candidates

[ProfessorPlum]

Run time: 08:46 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bEFyb78yHU   Posted on YouTube: January 16, 2008 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: January 16, 2008 By DU Member: ProfessorPlum Views on DU: 1373

 
Edwards = power
Obama = personality
Clinton = party

[sandnsea]

1. Except Obama is about personal empowerment

Yes WE Can.

[Tektonik]

5. Yes we can

yes we can ignore gays
yes we can bomb Iran
yes we can bomb Pakistan
yes we can watch Oprah

[sandnsea]

6. Yes we can pull shit out of our ass

It's all just a big game anyway, just like your Mercer for President game.

[Tektonik]

7. there's a difference between humor

and Obama's bigoted actions and hawkish language.

[sandnsea]

8. Figments of the imagination

that's all you've got in that post.

[Jane Austin]

2. Her comments about Obama, who does have a great personality

in addition to his many other outstanding qualities, would be like someone saying the only reason Rachel Maddow is on teevee because she's got such a great personality.

Her cheerfulness IS a huge asset to the message she delivers for the left, but she's not just a cheerful face.

She's intelligent, insightful, quick-witted, well-spoken and usually right on the money.

I thought she was overly-simplistic in her remarks last night.

[Rock_Garden]

3. I've decided that all of them on MSNBC read prepared remarks.

In fact, I think that they do it like musical chairs, from the way it sounded last night. Most of them had completely switched their positions on the candidates from previous shows.

[SleeplessinSoCal]

4. I was happy when she managed to get a word in. What does that say?