Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary talks of "answering the phone at 3 AM"... with "bedtime story" voice in full effect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:41 PM
Original message
Hillary talks of "answering the phone at 3 AM"... with "bedtime story" voice in full effect
Edited on Fri Feb-29-08 06:53 PM by jefferson_dem
 
Run time: 02:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTRfGZjPrrk
 
Posted on YouTube: February 29, 2008
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: February 29, 2008
By DU Member: jefferson_dem
Views on DU: 1160
 
Hillary Says It Herself: I Know What It Means When That Phone Rings At 3 A.M.
By Greg Sargent - February 29, 2008, 5:00PM

Hillary hit the 3 A.M. phone call theme herself at an event in Texas a little while ago, defending herself against Obama's denunciation of her new ad as fear-mongering by saying: "I don't think people in Texas scare all that easily."

Take a look...

Clearly, the Hillary camp is trying to swing the late-breakers her way by sowing last-minute doubts about Obama's readiness to be commander-in-chief. It seems like a pretty big gamble -- we'll see if it works, or if it sparks a back-lash among voters turned off by tactics such as the use of kids in ads.

Transcript after the jump.

Transcript:

“I know the difficulties that our men and woman in uniform face everyday and I also understand completely what it means when that phone rings at 3 a.m. There isn’t any time to convene your advisors, to do a survey about what will or will not be popular – you have to make a decision. In the world that we face with both the challenges and opportunities, we need a president who picks up that phone ready to decide.
Senator Obama says that if we talk about national security in this campaign we are trying to scare people. Well, I don’t think people in Texas scare all that easily.

The American people aren’t afraid of the challenges and dangers we face in the world. They want a president with the strength and wisdom to take those challenges and dangers head on. There’s a big difference between giving speeches about national security and giving orders as commander in chief. There’s a big difference between delivering a speech at an anti-war rally as a state senator and picking up that phone in the White House at 3 a.m. in the morning to deal with an international crisis.

Senator Obama talks about these issues but when it came time to act, he was missing in action. He gave a speech in 2002 against the war in Iraq and I commend him for that speech. By 2004 he was saying he wasn’t sure how he would’ve voted because he never had to vote and that he basically agreed with the way President Bush was conducting the war. And by the time he got to the Senate, he voted exactly as I did. There’s a difference between making a speech when you have no responsibility and having to step up and take charge and take responsibility for your actions.

He was missing in action when he failed to show up for a vote dealing with Iran. He was missing in action when he failed to hold a single substantive hearing on a committee that he chaired that had responsibility for Europe and NATO and NATO’s policy in Afghanistan. Protecting and defending this country is the most solemn duty of our president. It is the pledge you take when you put your hand on that Bible and take the oath of office and you swear to protect and defend our Constitution and America.

I understand that. That’s why I have been endorsed by 25 generals and admirals who know that I will be there to answer that phone and that my experience equips me to give the right answer when I do. They know that national security is the most important duty of our president. We’ve never had a presidential campaign where national security wasn’t an issue and we’re not about to start now especially if the Republican candidate will be Senator McCain. We know the Republicans will run a campaign about national security. I feel absolutely comfortable standing on that stage with John McCain and going toe to toe about national security.”

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/hillary_says_it_herself_i_know.php#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fact is, she doesnt know what its like to answer the phone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. or manage a crisis for that matter.
...Other than those within her own personal orbit, which I will not make a judgment on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. OMG is she for real...
I half expected to see John McCain at the end of that ad....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Have you seen Obama's response to the Clinton ad?
A thread was started on it on the Latest Page--the response started out the same way as Clinton's ad, but then showed a photo of the White House and then photos of Obama, with words over them telling about Obama's stand on Iraq, his saying we needed to stay in Afghanistan, and finally talking about him trying to stop nuclear proliferation. It ended talking about how important JUDGMENT was. Found it VERY effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. thanks
I found the ad so impressive I watched it twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. To all who opposed the invasion of Iraq ...
... according to Mrs. Clinton, your marches and speeches and petitions and hard work to stop the IWR and Bush's order to invade Iraq were irresponsible.

She was wrong and now thousands and thousands of Iraqis and GIs are now dead ... but is she stepping up and taking responsibility for her actions?

Old Hill is sounding more like John McBush every day.

Fear -- it worked for Bush/Cheney -- will it work for Mrs. Clinton, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. This needs a recap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. She is reading a John McCain speech. Do they have the same speechwriter? And ad agency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yes.
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 04:41 AM by JTFrog
Or close enough:


http://www.americablog.com/2008/02/mark-penns-tangled-corporate-web.html

Monday, February 25, 2008

Mark Penn's tangled corporate web: Clinton is a client; McCain is a client.
by Joe Sudbay (DC) · 2/25/2008 10:18:00 AM ET · Link
Discuss this post here: Comments (124) · reddit · FARK ·· Digg It!


As has been widely reported, Hillary Clinton's top guru, Mark Penn, is leading the charge within the Clinton campaign to go aggressively negative against Obama. Besides the fact that Penn is the architect responsible for Hillary's presidential aspirations going from "inevitable" to being on life support, he is reportedly obsessed with destroying Obama. While it is understandable that Clinton's top adviser wants his client to win at all costs, going massively negative against Obama (or Hillary for that matter) risks damaging our candidate in the fall election against McCain. Unfortunately, this is something another "client" would welcome. That client is named John McCain.

Penn is the CEO of Burson-Marsteller, a DC public relations (PR) firm. Burson-Marsteller owns a subsidiary, BKSH. BKSH is run by Charlie Black. Black is a longtime Republican politico, and a top adviser for John McCain for President. And, as Think Progress notes, while Black is a volunteer on the McCain campaign, he views Mcain as his client and continues to take a paycheck from BKSH. JedReport dissected these relationships in a diary on DailyKos last night.



*edit link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woundedkarma Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. So now she's the "decider"? :> :> :> n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Plagarism Game
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ztarbod Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary's ad for McCain
She just doesn't have the experience to back-up this ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ad for McCain is right.
Sounds like she's campaigning for McCain in the GE.

As if unless we hand her the WH then to hell with us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. It does seem she is campaigning for McCain at this point doesn't it:
Edited on Sat Mar-01-08 04:48 AM by JTFrog
She is blatantly attempting to swiftboat a DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE, but says that McCain is off limits because he is her friend.

Clinton interviewd on Today:

Meridith:"...you alluded to a very personal crisis in your own life involving infidelity, so I want to ask you, what is your opinion of what Senator McCain is going through right now.... and is that the kind of attack that should be part of a campaign?"

Clinton: "Well I'm not gonna comment on that, Senator McCain is a friend of mine,... I wish the campaign were about what we want to do for America..."

Meridith:"So if you become the nominee that will be off limits?"

Clinton:"Well I wanna talk about what I wanna do for the country".

Too bad she doesn't have the same loyalties to the democratic party. Her republican loyalties resulted in her votes for WFRA, IWR, Kyl-Lieberman, Bankruptcy, Patriot Act, just on my short list. She has been a neo-con's wet dream and now she will be McCain's.

*edit to add link of video if you can stomach it - http://video.aol.com/video-detail/clinton-interviewed-on-today/453375161
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. note to Hillary
Stop plagerizing Rudy Guiliani. At the end of the ad I could have sworn I saw Guliani name crossed out and replaced with Hillary Clinton. What's next? Hillary campaign being reduced to a noun a verb and 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedreport Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-01-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. The idea that Obama opposed the war out of political calculation is so kwazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC