Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, so Libby learned about Plame from Darth Sneer. Think with me

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 07:51 PM
Original message
OK, so Libby learned about Plame from Darth Sneer. Think with me
about that for a minute. I don't know how many covert operatives there are in the CIA, but I bet Cheney doesn't just happen to know who most of them are, and whom they're married to. But he knew about Plame/Wilson. When did he acquire that knowledge? Moreover, WHY did he acquire that knowledge? I'm betting he knew about Plame because of her work on anti-proliferation. Like Robert Paulsen pointed out, Darth didn't want the AQ Khan connections to him, BCCI, Halliburton & all that surfacing, so he had people keeping tabs on Valerie. The fact that he seems to have been the primal source for the whole outing campaign would suggest that he already knew about her, had people keeping an eye on her undercover activities, etc. This would seem to mean Darth had moles in the CIA reporting to him, via extralegal channels, about what Plame & Brewster-Jennings were up to. Then when they needed to discredit Wilson, Darth saw his opportunity to score a twofer, taking out the Plame & Brewster-Jennings operation while at the same time slapping Wilson down with the entire nepotism distraction.

Does this make sense to anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Could it have been part of the "stovepiping" that Hersh wrote about?
I, too, believe Cheney knew who Valerie Plame was and what she did well before Joe Wilson wrote his op-ed, even before Joe Wilson was sent, by the CIA, to Niger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I think this existed outside the stovepiping channel.
It wasn't part of the system of short-circuiting the normal intelligence-vetting functions of the CIA. It was something else, more of a spying-on-the-spies operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nannah Donating Member (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. the destruction of brewster jennings always seemed like a primary target
to me, much more substance to the damage to brewster jennings than trying to somehow humiliate Joseph Wilson.... much more treasonable also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Yes
There was no reason to out Brewster Jennings if the whole thing was just retaliation against Wilson. Outting the wife as working at the agency, would have done the job...why was there a need to out Brewster Jennings? (main objective?)I too believe there is much, much more to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Soon as I heard that Plame was involved in the anti proliferation
part of CIA I suspected this. Everything you point out went through my mind at some point. I just didn't think anybody in the corporate media would make the connection or if they did, have the balls to call attention to it. I'm still dubious that we'll hear about it anywhere except here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. I keep hoping that Fitz will gradually chip away and we'll find out the actual sequence of events.
Unless someone writes a tell-all years from now, or unless Fitz gets to the treasonous outing underlying the Libby perjury and obstruction charges, we may never find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. I think Fitz is pursuing something major (or maybe already has it)
It hasn't made any sense to me for a long time that Fitz has been dragging this whole thing out for this long for one perjury case, especially considering his history in other corruption cases and also considering how many other irons he has in the fire with his other responsibilities. Doesn't make any sense, that is, unless Libby is just the thread that starts a large unraveling, and Fitz already knows quite a bit about what's he's about to unravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The mystery sealed indictment?
Maybe it is for Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. That speculation is floating around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Delicious! I hope it's true and it happens. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Darth Sneer", thanks for that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Didn't Wilson say that the request for the CIA to send someone to Niger
originally came from the OVP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, you're right. I hadn't made that connection--
but it's an interesting one. Makes you wonder how specific that request was--"Send someone" or "Send Joe Wilson?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. he was trashing Wilson and the "CIA" told him to stop cause Valerie was under cover.. the CIA told
him and told him to knock it off.. and say nothing about plame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Plame was working on proliferation information for Iran.
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 08:15 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Since we know Iran is where they were ultimately headed, I think it's a good guess that they needed her out of the way, early. It just backfired on them, in a big way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. It makes perfect sense, especially . . .
. . . since Cheney has a need to be in total control of everything. He's no doubt been developing a network of moles in the CIA for decades. He's obsessed with power. He's got strings running to everything.

He's evil and crafty. Just not crafty enough.

I was thinking that had this happened in the Soviet Union, the KGB would've taken him out years ago . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. FWIW trial testimony is that Libby learned about Plame from CIA Robert Greneir, not Cheney
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 08:19 PM by emulatorloo
So it sounds like "I learned it from Cheney" is another scooter libby lie.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2007/02/01/libby_cheney/index1.html

<snip>
Upon the publication of Nicholas Kristof's column in the New York Times on May 6 that described the Wilson mission but did not identify him, Cheney went into a fury. Libby was dispatched to unearth material about Wilson. He called Robert Grenier, chief of the CIA's counterterrorism unit, on June 11 and learned from him the identity of Valerie Plame, according to Grenier's testimony this week in the Libby trial. From that moment, Libby began his disinformation campaign that she was responsible for sending her husband on the mission, which was authorized by higher CIA officials. Under oath to Patrick Fitzgerald's grand jury, Libby claimed that he first learned about her identity from Tim Russert on July 10. (Grenier, for his part, was forced out of the CIA in early 2006 for opposing the administration's torture policy.)
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I don't think Grenier's right about this.
He may have told Libby on the 11th, but I think Libby already knew. Didn't Fitz bring forth evidence or testimony that Libby knew before the supposed Russert sourcing? IIRC Russert says he learned it from Libby on the 10th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Grenier **June*** 11, Russert **July** 10th. So Russert convo a month later
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 08:33 PM by emulatorloo
unless I am misreading. . .

BTW check out that Salon article if you get a chance it is a good one.


ON EDIT -- not that I thnk this contradicts the spirit of your theory about Cheney Plame twofer.

ON EDIT again -- see this hot new thread on Brewster Jennings

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x105247
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Only one thing to say at a time like this...
Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
42. Nah, Not really -- it is confusing as hell, and Bond's testimony contradicts Grenier
So who the heck knows who told who?!?!? I feel like I've had sand thrown in my eyes. . .

The only thing we are certain of is that Scooter and Cheney are both liars. But we knew that before.

:patriot: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Self delete -- wrong place
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 08:28 PM by emulatorloo
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. The blogging testimony today from Debbie Bond, an FBI agent
that interviewed Libby brings out that Libby first learned about Mrs. Wilson from Cheney:
DB = Debbie Bond
Z = Prosecution

SNIP


Z did you talk about how he learned of Plame's id

DB he first learned about Plame from VP, during telephone call on or about June 12, 2003. Description of phone call. A handwritten note he claimed he had written during this conversation.

Z What did he tell you. Precise date.

DB On the note 6/12/03, line on top, meant approximately. Regarding an article by Pincus. Written for newspaper on June 12, he believed he talked about this note prior to that. He had written the date afterwards, within a couple of days, couldn't remember precisely when.

Z He dated it afterwards. He told you what about when.

DB A day or two before 6/12

Z What did he tell you VP told him

DB Libby told us that VP told him that AMb's wife worked in CP division. Libby explained that CP stood for Counter Proliferation.

Z Did Libby tell you where he tought VP learned this.

DB Yes–VP told him he received it from someone at CIA. He believed VP had learned it from Tenet. However he was not certain if it was Tenet or someone else.


End of SNIP

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/01/libby-live-fbi-agent-bond-three/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. An FBI agent claims Libby learned about Plame from Cheney:
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/linkframe.php?linkpg=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003540604&linkid=30113

FBI Agent Testifies Libby Learned About Plame from Cheney
Scooter Libby


By E&P Staff and The Associated Press

Published: February 01, 2007 10:00 AM ET updates all day

WASHINGTON The "CIA leak" trial resumed today, after two critical days of testimony from reporters Judith Miller and Matt Cooper. As in past days, E&P will provide running updates here.

After a long day or legal wrangling and no witnesses, an FBI agent took the stand shortly before 3 p.m. She is Deborah Bond, a 19-year veteran, called into the probe of who may have leaked name of classified agent.

She described the bureau's interview with I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby on Oct. 14, 2003. Asked where he first learned of Ambassador Joe Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, he had told the FBI then -- from the vice president, on or about June 12 that year, in a telephone conversation.

Vice President Cheney had also said that she worked in "CP" or counter-proliferation at the agency. How did Cheney know this? From someone at the CIA -- possibly director George Tenet, but Libby wasn't sure.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Unfortunately, it makes a LOT of sense.

It's unthinkable, but then we are talking about shrub and darth, and their cabal, aren't we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Moles !!!!
Eeeek - that's what happens when you let a corrupt cabal of republicon cronies steal your government !

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Our yard's full of those critters & I keep trying to trap them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. there's moles, and then there's moles
these guys are a lot cuter than Darth Cheney and his minions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
35. Spread blood meal in your yard
it's fairly inexpensive, environmentally safe and within 2 days, the moles are gone. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Maybe, But Darth might have just put out the "word" to find SOMETHING
on Joe...or his wife, family, or friends and the information got swept up along with everything else...


or not...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. Always understood the reasons...
Never thought about Darth having his own ops. Makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Makes sense to me!
:hi:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Hi Robert.
Nice of you to drop by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. k & r -- makes plenty of sense to me. Well done!
:hi:

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. By Jove, I think you've got it! k/r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
passy Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
34. Our dear departed ambassador to the UN knew all about it.
Why is it that he is never mentioned. He is the one person that everyone forgets about in this sordid tale.
Bolton was right in the middle of the action as he was Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.
From wikipedia " At the same time, he was involved in the implementation of the Proliferation Security Initiative, working with a number of countries to intercept the trafficking in weapons of mass destruction and in materials for use in building nuclear weapons."
I also remember reading that even when he had left his post he was still receiving classified info on the Proliferation Security Initiative.
I bet you he even volunteered the information to Cheney via John P Hannah perhaps, from Wiki "John P. Hannah is a senior aide on national security to U.S. vice president Dick Cheney. He is on loan to Cheney's office from the office of former State Department official and current U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton. Hannah is believed to be a subject of the Valerie Plame investigation."
Considering Bolton's history of destroying every initiative regarding the proliferation of WMDs it would not surprise me that to retaliate against the Wilsons and uncovering Brewster Jennings would have seemed like a perfect opportunity to the PNACkers.

Passage from Wiki describing Bolton's methodology "Bolton was instrumental in derailing a 2001 bio-weapons conference in Geneva convened to endorse a UN proposal to enforce the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. "U.S. officials, led by Bolton, argued that the plan would have put U.S. national security at risk by allowing spot inspections of suspected U.S. weapons sites, despite the fact that the U.S. claims not to have carried out any research for offensive purposes since 1969."<13>

Also in 2002, Bolton is said to have flown to Europe to demand the resignation of Jose Bustani, head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), and to have orchestrated his removal at a special session of the organization. The United Nations' highest administrative tribunal later condemned the action as an "unacceptable violation" of principles protecting international civil servants. Bustani had been unanimously re-elected for a four-year term—with strong U.S. support—in May 2000, and in 2001 was praised for his leadership by Colin Powell.<14>

He also pushed for reduced funding for the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program to halt the proliferation of nuclear materials."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
36. there are so many connecting dots on Cheney
if it were a visual display - he would look like he has the measels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Naw, that was the other guy--Harry Whittington (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
37. Is it possible Cheney intentionally had Wilson involved to get to Plame?
If Cheney wanted to shut down Plame's work on anti-proliferation for fear of what it might expose about him then he may have orchestrated Wilson's trip to Niger behind the scenes. Wilson had already spoken out against the invasion of Iraq, giving Cheney good reason to expect Wilson would discover and report back the truth of the forgery, and resulting in the excuse to smear Wilson and out Plame. We know Cheney spent an inordinate amount of time at the CIA before the invasion.

From The Nation article http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=823">A White House Smear:

Was Wilson's wife involved in sending him off to Niger? Wilson won't talk about her. But in response to this query, he says, "I was invited out to meet with a group of people at the CIA who were interested in this subject. None I knew more than casually. They asked me about my understanding of the uranium business and my familiarity with the people in the Niger government at the time. And they asked, 'what would you do?' We gamed it out--what I would be looking for. Nothing was concluded at that time. I told them if they wanted me to go to Niger I would clear my schedule. Then they got back to me and said, 'yes, we want you to go.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Wilson went to Niger in Feb/March 2002.
Edited on Fri Feb-02-07 06:16 AM by Garbo 2004
So no, he wasn't sent to Niger in early 2002 because he was an outspoken critic in 2003 of the Iraq invasion.

Cheney had asked a question and it was the CIA that decided to send someone to Niger. No doubt it was a question the CIA as well as the State Dept had previously answered for Cheney. Both State and CIA had previously said the Niger claims were bunk. Also a general had also previously gone to Niger to check out the claims and also said they were bogus. I'm thinking the CIA may have been doing some extra CYA-ing by sending someone out to Niger. Wilson had previously done some "on the ground" fact checking for the CIA in Africa due to his familiarity with and contacts in the region. So it wasn't all that peculiar that when the CIA thought of sending someone to Niger in February 2002 they would think of Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Thanks for sorting me out on this
I know better but I have it stuck in my head that Wilson went to Niger in 2003, probably because that's when his op-ed appeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. OVP was asking for info from State & CIA about Wilson's Niger trip. They reported back to Cheney &
Libby, verbally and in writing (State INR June 10 memo, for example) with info that included that Valerie Wilson worked at the CIA and had some involvement with Wilson's trip. Libby's October 2005 indictment already told us that.

What's really interesting is the revelation of info at the trial not previously revealed in the indictment or the prosecution's pre-trial filings.

That Cheney told Libby about Plame is not news. It was in Libby's notes turned over to the investigation. And it was in the indictment. That an FBI investigator just testified that Libby had admitted to investigators that he and Cheney may have discussed leaking Valerie Wilson's CIA employment to the media IS news.

Additionally in regards to Brewster-Jennings, IMO some people wrongly regard B-J as if it was a big operation on its own, running agents, etc. B-J was a front company, a cover, that was not much more than a name with an address at an office building where it wasn't a tenant. It was not a cover that could withstand serious scrutiny. It was useful I guess as an employer of record for agents to use in their real identities, as Valerie Wilson did. And any of those other agents who also had cited an affiliation with B-J also were compromised when Wilson's cover was blown. But as other former CIA agents have noted, when she was operating undercover overseas, Valerie Wison would have posed under other identities with affiliations with real companies that existed and would check out along with her "employment" with them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
41. This was Randi Rhodes' analysis to a T.
Sounds logical. For criminals, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC