Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AnoSexia fundamentosa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 10:28 AM
Original message
AnoSexia fundamentosa
We need some shorthand that gets to the core of the pathology of fundamentalism in America today. I propose the term "anosexia".

Like anorexia, anoSexia is a body dysmorphia. The victim of this psychological disorder finds the natural sexual apetities of its body to be gross and ugly, and seeks to eliminate them.

Now, from what I hear, anorexia is a form of self-loathing; but the loathing is directed at the anorexic's own body. Anorexics only injure themselves. AnoSexics cause themselves psychological injury; but they also injure or kill other people. AnoSexics turn their self-loathing outwards, blaming other people for their problem. Sort of like if an anorexic bombed a McDonalds.

Along the way, the constant internal vigilance against the dreaded (but totally natural and healthy) sexual desire causes a change in brain chemistry. Anorexics actually get high on starving. That's why its so hard to get them to stop. AnoSexics move their sexual desire over into the category of "religious ecstasy". At that point, anoSexics form a perverse mutual support system, taking turns keeping up the self-hypnosis and projection.

Unlike anorexics, who really do enjoy starving, anoSexics are total hypocrites. Not a week goes by that we do not hear of some high-placed fundamentalist (a minister or a political office holder, always Republican) being exposed for pornography or child molestation or wife beating or adultery or being a closet homosexual. If an anorexic behaved like Ted Haggard, he would weigh about 300 pounds.

You can't call a person whose actions oppose ONLY people's sexual habits (but not mass killings, economic inequality, or environmental destruction) "religious". You can call them self-deluded perverts, power hungry mysogynists and homophobes. But you can't call these violent, hate-filled people Christians.

I invite you all to use the term.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. This IS a useful line of effort.
I'm going to go to the OED on the prefix, ano-, though. I LIKE it, but I'm just fussy about things like that.

We absolutely DO need some "easy" efficient way of propogating this meme!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. You might be onto something
but the disorder is closer to bulimia.

People who deny the natural sex drive to the point of religious ecstasy tend to binge in secret (hence the number of the pious who have been caught doing all sorts of pervy things) and then purge by self mortification and marathon church sessions.

Anorexics eat as little as possible and then exercise to purge themselves of that particular sin. Bulimics gorge themselves and purge with laxatives and vomiting. While some of the pious might resemble anorexics and do marathon prayer sessions to purge themselves of sinful thought (and the only sin is sex), most of them are like those caught doing all sorts of amazing things with their and other people's equipment, only able to cope when they have sex binges followed by purging.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Your description is probably more accurate; but it isn't as good a neologism :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. You may want to consider submitting that to Urban Dictionary. The term is mostly untaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. BTW, is there a "Framing" or "Meme" work group/forum here on the DU?
It would be good to come back now and then to check a full spectrum of rhetorical construction on all of the issues. However, this may be toooooo public a place to conduct such an effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. front page kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC