Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AEI website: The NEO-CONS want to PRIVATIZE the CIA!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:26 PM
Original message
AEI website: The NEO-CONS want to PRIVATIZE the CIA!
Twice this past week, on January 23 and 25, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held hearings on intelligence reform. Topics included the remaining 9/11 Commission recommendations and efforts both to facilitate information-sharing across the U.S. government's 16 intelligence agencies and to increase the number of operatives and linguists.

The committee's schedule suggests Sen. Jay Rockefeller will use his new majority status and chairmanship to increase oversight and press the Bush administration on matters ranging from CIA rendition programs to the National Security Agency's warrantless surveillance programs. Oversight should be welcome, but neither it nor the 9/11 Commission's recommendations will be enough to rectify the quality of U.S. intelligence analysis.

In a seminal article in the Economist in 1955, historian C. Northcote Parkinson described the behavior of bureaucracies. First, he observed, any "official wants to multiply subordinates, not rivals; and officials make work for each other." He used the British admiralty to illustrate his case. Between 1914 and 1928, its commissioned ships declined two-thirds. Over the same period of time, the number of officials managing them almost doubled.

As John Negroponte prepares to move from the directorship of National Intelligence to Foggy Bottom, it is clear that his legacy falls far short of real reform. He hired 1,500 employees for his new office, but missed recruitment targets for both operatives and analysts.

This is failure. As both the Iranian nuclear drive and al Qaeda's declared war on the United States continue, the nation needs spies to peer where satellites cannot and men on the ground to hear conversations that take place in caves rather than on cell phones. The failure to recruit and retain quality linguists is also a scandal. While Rockefeller criticizes wiretap procedures, the true outrage is the failure of the intelligence and law enforcement communities to put the products of such surveillance to use. On July 27, 2005, Glenn Fine, inspector general for the U.S. Department of Justice, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that the Federal Bureau of Investigation backlog of counterterrorism and counterintelligence audio surveillance awaiting translation had grown from almost 25,000 hours on December 31, 2003, to more than 38,000 hours on March 31, 2005. Department of Justice sources say the problem has not diminished.

While the number of spies and linguists may be a critical metric for gauging U.S. capabilities, access to raw material does not itself correlate with quality analysis. Here, the intelligence community falls short. Take Larry Johnson, a former CIA and State Department analyst to whom the CIA awarded two Exceptional Performance commendations. On July 10, 2001, Johnson penned a New York Times op-ed entitled "The Declining Terrorist Threat." As Mohamed Atta and the other 9/11 hijackers conducted dry runs for their attack, and despite Osama bin Laden's 1998 declaration of war on the United States, Johnson argued that Americans were not primary targets of terrorism. He blamed concern about Islamist terrorism on "24-hour broadcast news operations too eager to find a dramatic story line."

While Johnson is just one public example, the poor quality of the CIA's analytical products is an open secret among intelligence consumers. Reports circulated to the State Department, Pentagon, Treasury Department, National Security Council, and the White House are seldom more analytical or detailed than published newspaper accounts.
http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25528/pub_detail.asp

They NEVER stop attacking this country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. WELL, if you really want to know, AEI IS where the "Surge" plan came from!
So, I guess the CIA is just a "talk shop" to these psychopaths.

REALLY, NPR reported this about a week before the "surge" plan was announced, because Joe Liberman and John McCain both did speeches that the unveiling of the AEI "plan," look it up (or maybe I will if I can find it first).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know, Frederick W. Kagan wrote it, here is the AEI's own...
Edited on Sat Feb-03-07 01:44 PM by originalpckelly
publication of it:
http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.25396/pub_detail.asp



^^^Mr. Weasel himself, the man who came up with this fucking "plan"^^^

You will notice that Stephen Hadley said this was an Iraqi plan:
"It's an Iraqi plan; they're in the lead; different operational concept to bring security to the population of Baghdad, not just simply sweep through looking for bad guys, following on with economic assistance that arrives in time and promptly, and adequate forces -- U.S. and Iraqi -- and having those forces working in a configuration that would be more effective."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's nice to put a face to this nightmare. Thanx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Here's the NPR story where Reporter Guy Raz predicts this...
<http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6730831>

Boost Troop Levels, Says Alternative Iraq Report


Listen to this story...(at link)
by Guy Raz


All Things Considered, January 5, 2007 · A study released last month by
the American Enterprise Institute supports the plan to increase U.S. troop levels
in Iraq — a move President Bush is expected to announce next week.

The study was written by Frederick Kagan and retired U.S. Army Gen. Jack Keane.
The two explained their recommendations in Washington Friday at an event that
also included Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. That pasty white guy has us by the short hairs?
They must have beat him up good when he was a kid in high school, to have so much hate in his heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. aka: Make the Rogue CIA the Actual CIA and kill off Plame's CIA...
Libby's trial must be getting good behind the scenes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. The quality of the hard working analysts, IMO, is outstanding.
The neo-cons working for The Executive Branch only have themselves to blame if the vetting of sources is NOT sound. When Porter Goss and his political lackeys were sent over, scores of career CIA officers tender their resignations or opted for retirement.

Our CIA personnel (the little people analysts and the low level operatives) are doing their job. It's that the information gleaned by these sources is manipulated to fit the Neo-Con's political agenda.

Why do you think ole' Cheney was making daily trips to the CIA?

We need to replace the mid and high level management with apolitical, intelligence trained people who care about gleaning the truth, NOT in serving the Unitary Executive's every whim. :shrug:

Plus, is it only me - when I hear that the next guest coming up on CSPAN's Washington Journal is a scholar for the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), I'm thinking Corporate Corruption and warmongering?

There's Lies, Big Lies and AEI's Spin. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wouldn't that be the ultimate nightmare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No worries, look a Porter Goss
and all the political lackeys who are still holding positions today. These clowns make the cartoon spy character Boris Badenoff look like a Rhodes Scholar in comparison. :rofl:

You want an effective spy organization, you keep the LEADERSHIP apolitical. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. In Johnson's defense....
he probably assumed we'd have an Executive Branch that would be paying attention, instead of blatantly ignoring the warnings from the same agencies the AEI would like to privatize. Unbelievably dangerous thinking coming from these wingnuts. No accountability for our nation's intelligence network's and subject to politicizing the data....just what Bush and Cheney did that got us into this quagmire in the first place. That worked well, didn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Division Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Johnson was technically correct about the general threat from terrorism...
at that point in time, and he did argue--even within the op-ed the right wing has been using to attack him--that "I believe strongly in remaining prepared to confront it.", advice that the Bush administration utterly failed to follow.

Here's an old post from dailykos.com concerning the Neo-Conservative attacks on Johnson: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/25/1817/86504
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. He hired 1,500 employees for his new office, but missed recruitment targets for both operatives and
analysts. Can congress cut off funds for these 1,500 staff? Time for Congressional oversight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Suggestion to clarify your post...
When I started reading the first paragraph I thought I was reading a post written by you. Perhaps you can add in the headline, byline and date at the top to make it more clear that this is the actual article.

Scary stuff though. :scared: <--- my new fav, er, most used emoticon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. It's an article from the AEI website. Sorry if you were confused.
It's too late to change it so "Suck it up Fluffy". :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Meh. Too bad you're so slow.
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yet another item to demand my reps to speak out on in public.
I keep telling my senators and representative they have to get vocal and get the public informed about PNAC and the long planned invasion of Iran and that whole region. The general public needs to know this is where W is getting his advice, er, orders. If they understood that the elected officials aren't even running this country, that they didn't vote for a good ol' boy and instead voted for an elitist, corporatist right wing think tank I think they'd lose some of that 30% they're still holding on to and the rest would be more prone to outrage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. If these idiots weren't so destructive, they'd make me laugh.
Edited on Sat Feb-03-07 02:59 PM by Cleita
In their efforts to destroy government and replace it with corporate rule, they really haven't thought through what life would be like then. We would deteriorate back into a condition of warring city states (or in this case companies)with constant raiding and pillaging on the backs of slave labor, just like the Bronze Age. I can hardly wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. CIA, Weather Service, NASA, Army, Navy, Coast Guard.
It is really quite depressing. The super-rich are trying to restore monarchy as a system of government. If everything is privatized, THEY will be the equivalent of kings and queens, if they are not already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well considering the fantastic job Haliburton has done on our collective behalf, who can blame em?
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. If they privatize it, then there's no accountability to Congress nor the public.
:scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Not only that the only rules that everyone would have to obey are the
rules they make up with no representation and no voting from the proletariat. Your life 24/7 would be like your job is forty hours a week. You would have no say in who issues orders to you or how they got appointed to their position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ribrepin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Bingo!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. The AEI is a nest of traitorous vipers.. . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Seems to me like AEI is a think tank that only thinks up
ways to destroy the USA. Is there one positive thing that this bunch of yahoos have done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Division Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. They don't have a problem with "poor quality" at the CIA, that's for sure.
What they have a problem with is individuals within or formerly associated with the CIA who criticize the Neo-Con venture, like Larry Johnson (who we see AEI attempt to smear in this article), or refuse to cook up the intelligence assessments they need for their plans. Privatizing is one of the stock solutions proposed by right wing think tanks like AEI, so it's no surprise they would suggest it as a solution to their problem with the CIA. It gets rid of their pesky inability to buy the "intelligence" they need to support Neo-Conservative policies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Just when you thought they couldn't think of anything more stupod than they have already
. . . they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Feith-based intelligence.
Bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Democrats need to start saying: PRIVATIZATION IS CORRUPTION
Those things essential to life and democracy should not be privatized: water, electricity, and the voting process.

Likewise, our military, intelligence, and diplomatic functions belong in government hands to ensure oversight and that the public good is the only agenda (which aint true now, but would be nice if it was).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
29. Does AEI hate America?
No really, It seems to me like they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. Market Fundamentalism:
"Privatize everything, rely on yourself and expect nothing from
your government."

The hallmark of Conservatism---why not privatize the CIA?(sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushwick Bill Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
32. See "Who Killed John O'Neill?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. The CIA Has Been Privatized for Decades - It's Just Not Official, Is All
Edited on Sun Feb-04-07 12:52 PM by Crisco
When you look at the history of the CIA and who it really serves, it begins to make sense. The CIA mainly serves American business interests and always has. Look at the career resumés of those who are at or near the top. What they were doing before they were CIA, and what they do when they leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC