Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Most Important Church-State Decision You Never Heard of

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 10:58 PM
Original message
The Most Important Church-State Decision You Never Heard of
Television preacher Pat Robertson can barely contain his anger when he talks about a 1947 Supreme Court decision called Everson v. Board of Education.

Robertson attacked the ruling on his "700 Club" several times last year. Everson came out of anti-Catholicism, he sputtered in January of 2006. Four months later, he blasted the decision because in it the justices "relied on a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists talking about a wall of separation that isn't in the Constitution."

Robertson is not the only one riled up over Everson. The case, considered a seminal ruling in modern church-state law, marks its 60th anniversary next month. Acknowledged as the most pivotal church-state ruling of the 20th century, Everson has become a magnet for both Religious Right broadsides and law review blasts from right-wing legal scholars.

Why is the far right so eager to discredit Everson? The case is crucial because in it the Supreme Court laid down a concise and wide-ranging definition of the First Amendment's religion provisions that have had a profound effect on church-state law. In addition, a unanimous court strongly endorsed Jefferson's assertion that the American people, through the First Amendment, have "erected a wall of separation between church and state." For anyone seeking to undermine that wall, discrediting Everson is job one.

http://www.alternet.org/rights/47365/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-03-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Actual Supreme Court Decision of Justice Black
Edited on Sat Feb-03-07 11:39 PM by happyslug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. ya know...
Edited on Sun Feb-04-07 02:01 AM by nebenaube
If xtians were indeed persecuted, Robertson & Flawell would already be uh... on the other side...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. If Christians were indeed persecuted,
Robertson and Falwell would never have gotten on the air. Instead, we'd have a multitude of cable channels dedicated to Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and Earth-Centered Spirituality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Don't forget the gays. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I guess I never really thought of "gay" as a religion.
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Afternoon kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC