Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OFFICIAL THREAD #1 House Judiciary Committee Hearing with the no show Miers to start at 10AM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 08:59 AM
Original message
OFFICIAL THREAD #1 House Judiciary Committee Hearing with the no show Miers to start at 10AM
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:08 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. suggest you put Official thread in your subject line please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Done! I might not be able to keep up with it though, so if it has to be continued, someone please
help!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
38. thanks, but I have to take off to work shortly myself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Photographers lining up in front of the witness table
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. lots of noice--people coming in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. (aside) 1 too many 'w's in the link for C-SPAN.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. I hope they put out an arrest warrant for her. At some point, they have to say enough is enough! nt
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:06 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. You beat me to it. : ) Corrected cspan3 link
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:08 AM by MiniMe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I have to go down a little later to work and if you can help keep this up, I'd appreciate it. :)
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. No problem.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
45. Thank you!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sanchez is in Chair's seat, Conyers to her right
I thought Conyers was Chairing this one. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think it is a subcommittee, and Sanchez is the chair of that sub
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. these links aren't working for me...
is it on yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Try this one for cspan3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. Yes, thanks
Hope Sanchez keeps a hold on this. Cannon like to act like he's in charge and needs a few boinks with that gavel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Is Capital Police there, standing by? Do we know where she lives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. You need to remove a 'w' in your c-span address. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Done! Darn fingers are being a bit trigger happy today! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. Prez to hold presser to deflect attention from this hearing
Won't work on DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I noticed that lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. That was my first thought! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. Is C-span 3 on the Wacky World Wide Web?
You might want to eliminate one of the w's in the URL...

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. link....better link to c-span 3 vs just c-span
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
21. Let's see...Cannon, Keller, and some other guy showed up on the Con side
All with their jackets off, wearing white shirts. (White collar criminals! LOL!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. The cons showed up today? They must want to block an inherent comtempt charge
They didn't show up yesterday for the Sara Taylor hearing, and she could have used a few friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Hearing coming to order
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. C-span showing witness table with a sign saying Ms. Miers and no one there! eom
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:11 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. So, if she doesn't show up and a warrant is issued,
then what next? Can B*shbot wrangle this into the shadows or something, or will the warrant MAKE her show up to the next hearing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Any bets? I say he does but it is somehow guarded or watered down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Here we go!!! Linda Sanchez will do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
30. The Gavel Falls
Let's get this show on the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. Sanchez is laying out the history of other Senior Advisors comming to testify
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. *chunk chunk*, "...will now come to order"
Meiers skipped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
33. Rep Linda Sanchez now called meeting to order
...stating her deep disaapointment of Meyers being a "no show"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
34. Darn! Why is all the good stuff on cspan3 now, & not 1 or 2!
Do a lot of people have access to cspan3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Only on-line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. 1 has to cover the house, 2 has to cover the senate
so that leaves 3 for anything else of interest. I wish more cable/dish providers had cspan3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
37. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
40. I smell some inherent comtempt coming...
Go Linda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
48. Not before Cannon speechifies about 'political theatre' and witch hunts
:puke:

Bet he throws in a couple of Valerie 'Flame' inconsistencies and Sandy 'Burglar' comments, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
41. Sanchez is doing a good historical smack-down on Bushy and Miers.
woo hoo! Go get 'em.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #41
49. Chris Cannon opposition statement
Saying everything the Dem. want is a fallacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. Cannon is a Z in this Venn diagram
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
42. Escalation
here comes the Constitutional crisis. Contempt. contempt, contempt!!
Arrest this woman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
43. Sanchez now summarizing all former testimonies by prior executives
...alowing witnesses to come forward, shows Bush executive forcing a constitutional crisis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
44. ha ha -the WH has CHOSEN CONFRONTATION (like the war)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
46. I CANNOT STAND CANNON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
47. DAMN, I can't listen to assholes like Cannon anymore!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
50. oh my gawd--Cannon will do his 'political ponyshow' AGAIN. showing his dummyness AGAIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
51. Chris Cannon now using the repuke talking points to show why this committee is totally unnecessary
....total bullshit as always
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. Cannon just called for "real... hard..... evidence" his emphasis
...but of course the White House continues to block all testimony and requests for documents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
52. Thanks for the thread, my C3 reception is woefully bad, so I'll stay tuned here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
53. Cannon whoring himself for the Shrub. We don't need Ms. Miers cooperation and
we don't need a showdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
54. what IS illegal is ignoring a subpeona, Cannon...
bottom line.. you can't spin your way around this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. EXACTLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. and illegal to tell someone not to answer a subpoena too. Link
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:21 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #58
72. yep, thats what Conyers just said...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
55. It's not "smoke and mirrors", Cannon. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #55
68. Cannon wants to see documents that prove WH involved-ha ha What the
heck does he think this INVESTIGATION is for? what a dummy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #68
74. ho ho--conyers is saying the same as I typed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
56. I want to see pic of the EMPTY Miers seat on the front page of all media/newspapers!
I dream a lot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
59. There is no such thing as Executive Priviledge, it is a coutesy
You don't have to have any evidence to overcome it. Oversight is your JOB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:21 AM
Original message
agreed.. it is congress' DUTY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
61. And Bush has a Press conference in 10 minutes??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
63. Cannon is a Z in this Venn diagram
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
64. ARGH!!! "unless we have evidence"
That's what the Hearings are for you #)(*%&)(#*^%@)(*&%^*()@#%^*(#@%^(@#*^%@)#(*^%@!!!!!!!!

Ever hear of DISCOVERY????? When the stonewalling stops, them MAYBE we'll get the evidence! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
65. Hey, Cannon, were you in Congress in 1996-1999? What would you call the bullsh*t
the GOP was doing ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #65
76. No, no. THAT story must be saved for the "Republicans ensnared by The Madam" whining!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
66. Cannon challenges the committee to produce EVIDENCE of any wrongdoing
Why do you think you're sitting on that committee, you fat stupid fuck? Because there is EVIDENCE OF WRONGDOING that you're supposed to be investigating. But you're not doing that, you're grandstanding, showboating and generally wasting America's time with your incredible spewage of lies and bullshit. Now Conyers is spanking him like a bad puppy.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
67. Conyers nails Cannon. Says that Cannon had 6 myths in his statement
and he was still catching his breath from it

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
69. Wouldn't this also be obstruction of justice? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
70. Conyers: "Still catching my breath after Cannon's 6 or more myths." BWAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
71. Conyers "Still catching my breath"
saying to Cannon, We're here to GET the evidence, you moron!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
73. Conyers 'splains it to Cannon

You go John Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
75. Conyers just bitch-slapped Connon on his six myths
"We are here to hear Harriet Meyers and her testimony!" :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #75
80. Cannon just embarrassed himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
77. Conyers coming in later worked out well in this case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
78. It looks like they are going to hold her in contempt!!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. yes it DOES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #78
82. It looks like it....I am surprised that she actually did not show. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #78
83. It certainly does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
81. Sanchez just declared committee recess and is prepared to rule
...that Meyers is in Contempt of Congress and subpoena
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
84. Ruh-oh...there it is! Meiers can't claim EP
Not legally valid

YES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
85. Sanchez is going after her

Its sure looks that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
86. Sanchez is slapping down this bogus E.P. argument but good!
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:28 AM by WinkyDink
Can't just claim it because Fred Fielding says you can!
Citing precedent cases. HAHAHAHA!!

"An astounding claim" without precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #86
95. I smell a contempt charge
HAHAHAHA!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
87. Interesting, not mentioned in yesterday's Senate hearing, the order of Exec Priviledge has
to come directly from Shrub and not his lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:28 AM
Original message
Sanchez slaps that down, too
woohoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
94. She's doing great!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #87
93. I think they were trying to give ST a bit of a break. Miers deserves none.
She is a lawyer, she knows better. I'm really surprised, many said that if subpoened, she would show up. Could she lose her law license for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
88. I love how they keep cutting to the table and empty chair for Miers.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #88
90. Nice...I am only listening to it....thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
89. Interesting--saying the Pres needs to personally send a letter claiming executive
privledge. Not good enough for lawyer to send letter (for miers at that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
91. My only thought is bush has talked to the partisan 5 on the
Supreme court and have their support for his contempt of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #91
96. Did he even need to talk to them? They know the score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #96
110. He had to make sure before moving against the congress.
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:36 AM by alfredo
Remember, Roberts testified that he would not overturn precedence, but then went to work to overturn precedence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
92. White House astounding claim that they are so above the law they can ignore
....formal congressional subpoena....Meyers is going to be hit by Contempt order
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #92
99. And DOJ is blatantly acting as WH attorney, not for the People n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
97. ",,,goes beyond Richard Nixon."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
98. "Goes even beyond Richard Nixon."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #98
101. That would be "the SPINNING Richard Nixon"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
100. Sounds like we are going to court and to criminal citations...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #100
104. Citing cases one after the other and putting it in the record
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #100
106. yes! This is incredible. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #106
114. "evidence indicates an abuse of power"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
102. I only wish they could rule on contempt before Shrub's presser is over! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #102
103. Could Bush BE any more obvious about trying to downplay this confrontation??
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:32 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #102
107. Sanchez is laying down the federal law and historical
rulings on executive privilege.
Miers is held in contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
105. So far five points are presented by Sanchez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
108. I bet Miers was told she would be pardoned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #108
109. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #108
111. No doubt
All Republicans will be pardoned nation wide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #108
112. Yes, they promised to "take care of her"
How touching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #112
118. Did she actually say that? Ick! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #108
113. No doubt. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #108
117. Can they just spring her from jail if she is held in contempt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
115. Sanchez and the committee believe there has been government misconduct
...and as such all executive privilege is suspended, so they need to hear the testimony and abuse of power evidence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
116. Sanchez: "Abuse of power"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #116
122. Conyers - so moved
The battle lines are being drawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
119. Great thread DUers!
So nice to be able to stop in and get up to speed quickly and easily!

:toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #119
132. Kudos to our "play by play" annouincers! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #119
139. yes, just got here myself you guys are marvelous!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
120. NO EP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
121. Now it is getting interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #121
124. 5 minutes now of Cannon Quisling Traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #121
125. Cooper is begging for Miers
ah fugg off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #125
129. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
123. Mr. cannon is a Z
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
126. Ugh! Now have to endure another five minutes of Cannon
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

Maybe it's time to make another pot of coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #126
130. Oh, he's CONCERNED that Congress will end up looking impotent! Bwahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #126
134. Sounds like a plan
His points are full of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #126
137. That's what I'm doing
:hi:

Sanchez nailed it very completely, and even got in references to Nixon, Rove, and "abuses of power by this administration." Hooray!

Cannon now advising the Congresspersons to keep their powder dry...making this contempt citation sound like a huge risk in case there is a court overturning any contempt by Miers et al.... What a tool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
127. I move that thread #2 is started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
128. Well, here comes a ration of shit....Cannon is up in reply to Sanchez.
What a complete Repuke apologist. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
131. Conyers just made a motion to hold Harriet Meyers in Contempt
...now Cannon is fumbling for the next 5 minutes....wow he just said that the courts will not uphold the subpoena
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
133. New Thread. Mods, please lock this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
135. THREAD #2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
136. Going over to Thread #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #136
140. ME TOO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
138. “The emperor…” “cannot tell private citizens to flaunt the law”
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 09:49 AM by usregimechange
Some D from TN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC