Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Targets Cheney in Libby Tapes (Guardian)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:18 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald Targets Cheney in Libby Tapes (Guardian)
Fitzgerald Targets Cheney in Libby Tapes
Monday February 5, 2007 11:01 PM

By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press Writer


Almost immediately after that, however, Fitzgerald steered the discussion toward Cheney and how his office responded to the growing criticism from former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who claimed to have led a fact-finding mission that refuted some prewar intelligence on Iraq.

Libby said Cheney mentioned in an offhand way in June of 2003 that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, worked for the CIA. Fitzgerald asked whether Cheney was upset by the apparent ``nepotism'' in the fact Plame may have arranged the trip. Libby said he did not recall.

Fitzgerald also asked whether Cheney expected Libby to share that with reporters, specifically Walter Pincus of the Washington Post. Libby said he did not.
Fitzgerald asked four times and in four different ways whether Libby could be absolutely sure he did not disclose the information to Pincus. Pincus never revealed Plame's identity.

``The vice president obviously thought it was important enough to share with you or interesting enough to color the background, correct?'' Fitzgerald said.

``Yes,'' Libby replied.


more at:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Should I start playing 'taps' yet for Dick Cheney?
Stick a fork in em, he's done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can't Cheney get some kind of deferment for his treason?
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 07:36 PM by SpiralHawk
I mean, he got 5 military deferments so he would not have to serve the USA in any way during Vietnam.

According to his official chickenhawk excuse, he "had other priorities." Making Massive War Profits, apparently.

So should Cheney not now be entitled to yet another deferment for his treason
against the United States of America?

I am sure Rush "Anal Cyst" Limbaugh and Bill "I've seen combat, sort of" O'Reilly would be
more than happy to testify on the necessity for Commander AWOL's Vice pResident, Cheney, to get
ANOTHER FRIKKING DEFERMENT because he is a republicon and therefore "special" --
not like ordinary Americans who actually serve their country
and act in a loyal and patriotic way.

"Smirk, smirk, sneer, sneer." - Dickie Five Deferments

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. ROFLMAO! and NO! No more delays for Dick nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I sure hope he doesn't pull a Ken Lay. I sure would like to see his sorry ass
frog marched to the Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. sorry to do this to you kpete -- but LINK?
I think you forgot to post it and boy do I wanna read this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Here ya go. LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Link, please?
Sounds great but the link is missing :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ok here's the yahoonews link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. But, but, but Cheney was sooooo clever to color the background within the lines!
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 08:04 PM by Major Hogwash
With his widdle crayon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dick Cheney's Worst Nightmare


"This is going to hurt me so much more than it will you, Mr. Vice President."

Julie
still president for life of the PFEB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I love him too!
...but that suit is not a good choice IMO! Neither the color nor the fit is flattering.

But that look in his eye says a lot. VP Dickie should be worrying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. How about this one?
It definitely works for him!



or this one:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yes, I like these better. Thanks!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I like that suit!
I think he looks nice in it.

I'm not nuts about the gray suit. :blush:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Sorry, but I don't. I'm not sure what it is...
Has he lost weight? It looks too big for him. Maybe it's his posture in this photo. Maybe it needs a press. I tend to think it's the fabric. The fabric for a mans suit is very important. It should have a weight and a drape that smoothes lines and flatters the physique. A good fitting suit makes a man look better. In this case you know the man beneath the suit looks better than the suit would have you think. Just my own opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Woot! Big Daddy.
Verah verah nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. There's the dreamboat.
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. OOooooooooooooo....
from the article

<snip>

``Do you recall any conversation at any time when Secretary Grossman told you that the former ambassador's wife worked at the CIA?''

``I don't recall,'' Libby said.

``You have no memory of that whatsoever?'' Fitzgerald responded.

``I'm sorry sir, I don't,'' Libby replied.

----
I've got a feeling that statement will return to bite someone in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Here's another working link - Forbes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC