|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:22 AM Original message |
Do You Want To Go Back To The Tax Rates Of The 50s and 60s? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. No, I Do Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. You've Got A Flaw In Your Argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. You Misread My Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 10:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Re: defense spending, let's not forget that defense spending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:07 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. 1st time homes/cars/GI Bill/Marshall plan spending/Korea & unions raising wages for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. I'm all for confiscatory tax rates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. They're Bad For The MIddle Class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. The middle class is a sociological term, not an economic term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. No, It's Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I was told the same "bad idea" based on motivation and growth - but I never saw numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I Think 50% Is About Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Thanks for the info - It looks like great minds think alike - albeit only one - yours has proved the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
21. counterfactual argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. It's Not Couterfactual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I don't get the impression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Then I Apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. The rising tide lifts all boats, fiscal policy that ignores economics would be foolish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I don't think it's practical for two reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. Welfare Kings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
3. We will have to if we're serious about paying the national debt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
5. You can put the number at any number of places.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Felinity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
6. Actually I'd like the public coffers replenished by the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. "How do they expect to pay for this 'war on terror' of their's" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. 50s & 60s tax rate for corporations would be good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. IRS Code 482 is not inforced on multi-nationals and tax credits via non-economic deals is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chemical Bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
11. Are you talking about income tax, not capital gains? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleedingheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
16. It is shameful that we haven't raised taxes to pay for a war... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jonathan50 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
20. Take the cap off Social Security taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Yeah! That's the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
24. No, tax rate should never be higher than 49% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
28. Yes. But the rates should be inflation adjusted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
32. 10% good enough for God good enough for uncle sam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC