Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman: Top Iraq Reconstruction Official Flown To Baghdad To Avoid Oversight Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:45 PM
Original message
Waxman: Top Iraq Reconstruction Official Flown To Baghdad To Avoid Oversight Hearing
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/06/iraq-carney/

Waxman: Top Iraq Reconstruction Official Flown To Baghdad To Avoid Oversight Hearing

For the first time since the war began, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) is holding aggressive oversight hearings into the billions in waste, fraud, and abuse of U.S. funds in Iraq.

On Jan. 10, when President Bush first made his plans for escalation public, he also announced plans to “appoint a reconstruction coordinator in Baghdad to ensure better results for economic assistance being spent in Iraq.” The next day, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice named career diplomat Timothy Carney to the position.

During this morning’s hearings, Waxman revealed that the State Department has blocked Carney from appearing at the hearing, despite the fact that Carney personally told Waxman he “was willing to come.” Moreover, the Bush administration has apparently rushed him to Baghdad despite claiming that the reason he could not appear at the hearing was because he “did not yet know what he was going to do in Iraq.”

WAXMAN: So I invited Ambassador Carney to testify today. When my staff talked to Ambassador Carney directly, he was cooperative and said he was willing to come. This the State Department refused.

Their first excuse was that he had not yet filled out his paperwork. Even though Secretary Rice publicly announced his critical new position, he apparently could not talk to Congress because he had not been officially hired.

Next, the State Department said Ambassador Carney could not come because he did not yet know what he was going to do in Iraq. This seemed odd, especially since the secretary had already announced that he was her new point person on Iraq reconstruction.

Then, just last week, we were informed that the department suddenly decided that Ambassador Carney was needed in Baghdad right away. So even though he was not officially hired and, according to the State Department, had no idea what he was going to do in Iraq, he was put on a plane to Baghdad this past Friday.

Waxman added that the State Department has “now told us that they may make him available to Congress in six months.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Subpoena Rice.
Make her explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Really. This is total b.s. They're helping to 'disappear' witnesses? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There is a jail cell in the Capitol...
:P

Put her ass down there and hold her in contempt of Congress until the witness comes back to the USA. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Just like they are going to "disappear" the '08 Presidential election.
Just wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Great idea!
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 03:49 PM by wryter2000
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. shakes head

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is just the very beginning of the bullshit.
The Dems need to grow a pair and start fighting back.

Subpoena Rice to explain is a good place to start, but just a drop in the bucket. The Dems are going to have to send a message that they aren't going to permit themselves to be f*cked with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Video conference - during the few hours a day they have
electricity?

Charges of obstructing a House investigation? Hmm, has a nice ring to it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Contempt! (If there is something like that for Congressional hearings.)
Take 'em down, Waxman. We're behind you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's right. Book 'em, Danno.
They are deliberately undermining an investigation by Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. And what's to stop them from continually doing so if no one says 'enough'? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I like the suggestion in post #1
Subpoena Condi - and tell her no shoe shopping on the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Guess the admin. hadn't had time to school Mr. Carney in
what they would consider proper answers or he hadn't gone to his 'spin' classes yet. I agree. They should subpeona Rice. Has she been under oath any of these other times she had been questioned. Could they put her under oath and really grill her? Maybe she'd finally crack! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Send a team to Iraq and question him there.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. So State knew that Waxman wanted to talk to Carney
First they stalled and said the paperwork hadn't been filled out. Then it was Carney couldn't come because he didn't know what his appointment was about. Then, darn the luck, Carney can't come because he's already in Baghdad.

Something smells here. And I'm sure our bulldogs in the press, who are so on top of astronauts in diapers and what a campaign staffer said on her blog three years ago, will be on this like so many geese on a junebug, right?

Right?

Oooh, listen! Crickets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Worst. Job. Ever.
I've had crappy jobs before, but never have I worked a gig that could catapult me into a civil war zone on the whim of cretin bosses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's time for Subpeonas!
It's time to drag their asses in through that door!
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Call it intuition - but it 'feels' like Shrub's
Boxed illusions and lies - and all the underlying corruption that has fed this immoral war is starting to unravel. With Libby on the stand, and Waxman just beginning long overdue oversight (overdue because the rethugs did no oversight) that the shit's about to hit the fan BIG.

My guess is the unaccounted for billions is just the tip of the iceberg. Who was it that said -"You can run, but you can't hide."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Time to exercise that subpoena power - asap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I truly hope Waxman's considering that option. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hold him in contempt, and subpoena Rice
Then cut off funding for Rice's personal support services, like meals, car service, phone, etc, and turn her into a peasant until she complies and furnishes a signed statement saying she understands the essential role of the co-equal branch's oversight.

(yes, I am high...would be nice to live in such a world every once in a while, though, wouln't it?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Impeach the Bitch for Incompetence
Or at least subpoena her ass every single week and grill her like a frickin' hot dog every day. One committee one day, another the next.

If the Pugs won't allow debate or votes on the floor, investigate, investigate, investigate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. You gotta be in some deep shit if you rather be in Bagdad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. He's being forced to go to Bagdad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. They are running scared...what do you think they are hiding?
That $8.8 Billion dollars, that's 8.8 THOUSAND MILLION dollars...didn't just disappear.
It got spent before the 2004 election and just before the Iraqi's took over. Why were all of the Iraqi reconstruction personnel all vetted for ideological party purity? 'Cuz that money was used to but an election in 2004. Call it a gut feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hmmm....Well I guess they all will leave the country soon. See ya Condi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. please contact waxmans office to let them know how much
we need and recognize his exceptional work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC