Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

News of the slightly unusual - Students using internet chat lingo in class

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 10:28 PM
Original message
News of the slightly unusual - Students using internet chat lingo in class
Middle school teacher Julia Austin is noticing a new generation of errors creeping into her pupils' essays.

Sure, they still commit the classic blunders — like the commonly used "ain't." But an increasing number of Austin's eighth-graders also submit classwork containing "b4," "ur," "2" and "wata" — words that may confuse adults but are part of the teens' everyday lives.

This "instant messaging-speak" or "IM-speak" emerged more than a decade ago. Used in e-mails and cell phone text messages, most teens are familiar with this tech talk and use it to flirt, plan dates and gossip.

But junior high and high school teachers nationwide say they see a troubling trend: The words have become so commonplace in children's social lives that the techno spellings are finding their way into essays and other writing assignments.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070207/ap_on_hi_te/techbit_im_speak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. What, nobody saw this one coming? It's hardly a surprise.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ur rite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. what, no one saw the most massive change in communications
in history causing a change, or even a fork in the language?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Suprise, suprise!
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. You should see it in other languages
In French, Spanish, and other romance languages, the common word "que" ("that" or "which") is often texted as "k". I've also seen "pourquoi" ("why", "because") turned into "prkwa". Cyber culture is older in France than even the USA because of Minitel, an internet-like system that the French telephone company built in the early 1980s.

There is text lingo in Esperanto. The circumflexes over some of the letters are replaced with the letter X immediately after. Grammatical endings are often dropped. ktp (Kaj tiel plu -- and so on).

Basque has a lot of computer text slang, having gone from being oppressed by Franco to becoming the center of a high-tech corridor in one generation. And since it uses ergative grammar, a lot of unnecessary words can be dropped anyway -- like verbs. The northern Basques in France also had Minitel.

Russians have THREE sets of computer slang -- one in Cyrillic, one in transliterated Roman (using mainly Polish spelling rules), and one in "Volapuk", using Roman letters and symbols to approximate Cyrillic letters. The Arab alphabet gets the same treatment.

And I'm sure I left out a whole lot ...

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. I saw it all the time when I was doing my student teaching.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcass1954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I see it from a co-worker in email and other writing.
She needed titles (auto auction business) from me, and left me a list of the VINs with the following message:

"ttls - 4 - fri"

which I thought meant that she needed 4 titles for the Friday sale. But there were only 3 VINs listed. I attached the 3 titles, and added a note:

"4 titles but only 3 VINs - What's the 4th VIN?"

The conversation the following morning ended with her pissed at me because my last statement was something along the lines that I was unaware that we worked in a chat room.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC