Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buried on p.18 in WaPO: "Rice Denies Seeing Iranian Proposal in '03"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:06 AM
Original message
Buried on p.18 in WaPO: "Rice Denies Seeing Iranian Proposal in '03"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/07/AR2007020702408.html

Rice Denies Seeing Iranian Proposal in '03
Remark Adds to Debate on Whether U.S. Missed Chance to Improve Ties With Tehran

By Glenn Kessler
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 8, 2007; A18

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was pressed yesterday on whether the Bush administration missed an opportunity to improve relations with Iran in 2003, when Tehran issued a proposal calling for a broad dialogue with the United States, on matters including cooperation on nuclear safeguards, action against terrorists and possible recognition of Israel.

Although former administration officials have said the proposal was discussed and ultimately rejected by top U.S. officials, Rice, who was then national security adviser, said she never saw it.

"I have read about this so-called proposal from Iran," Rice told the House Foreign Affairs Committee yesterday, referring to reports in The Washington Post and other publications last year. "We had people who said, 'The Iranians want to talk to you,' lots of people who said, 'The Iranians want to talk to you.' But I think I would have noticed if the Iranians had said, 'We're ready to recognize Israel.' . . . I just don't remember ever seeing any such thing."

Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) cited a former Rice staff member, Flynt Leverett, who has publicly discussed seeing the proposal when he worked at the White House.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Odd. China doesn't recognize Taiwan and we talk to them
"But I think I would have noticed if the Iranians had said, 'We're ready to recognize Israel.' . . . I just don't remember ever seeing any such thing."

I'm sick of this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. hell, they talk to each other.
Condi has as much credibility as bill orarely on proper workplace behavior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bahawahawa...There it is folks! Nations must recognize Israel before US will engage diplomatically
"We had people who said, 'The Iranians want to talk to you,' lots of people who said, 'The Iranians want to talk to you.' But I think I would have noticed if the Iranians had said, 'We're ready to recognize Israel.' . . . I just don't remember ever seeing any such thing."

And that's why the US won't engage Iran in discussions. It's all about Israel.

It's fucking ridiculous - the Administration represents Israel, not the US !!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. More convenient amnesia for Dr. Rice....
I'm surprised she can even remember her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steven_S Donating Member (810 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Once again it amounts to this:
Either she is a liar or the most incompetent person ever to walk the halls of power. Perhaps both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kind of like all those warnings about Al-Qaeda before 9/11
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 08:36 AM by tanyev
DR. RICE: I would say that most of it was actually historical. It was not a catalogue of, they might use this, they might use this, they might use this, they might use that. That was not the character. But it was mostly historical, going back to things that happened in '97, things that happened in '98, kind of methods of operation in the embassy bombings, might they return to some of those methods. It was that kind of thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You beat me to it! You answered my question...thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Doesn't this ridiculous lack of memory remind you of
the time Condi was in front of another investigative hearing when she couldn't recall anyone thinking our enemies would fly planes into our skycrapers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. It gets better --
This morning NPR played a snippet from a Rice interview where she specifically discussed the proposal she now says never happened.

Why do these folks never learn, their words are recorded and stored for a very, very, long time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC