Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What new "documents" could Hannity possibly have?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:19 PM
Original message
What new "documents" could Hannity possibly have?
Edited on Thu Aug-09-07 08:24 PM by FVZA_Colonel
I was flipping through the channels, and came across an advertisement for Sean Hannity's Sunday show, which proports to have documents that will "blow the lid off" the Wilson's story and expose the real truth: basically, that they're a bunch of liars.

I really want to know: what new documents could Hannity possibly that would show this? Because it seems to me that every factual document brought up so far has completely supported the Wilson's case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is well "documented"...
that Hannity is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Not insane. Just very dim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. sure Hannity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. probably that manufactured crap from that GOP committee
the one that David Brooks always quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. crap from Woolsey no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. see this story from Consortium news
Edited on Thu Aug-09-07 08:55 PM by MissWaverly
it refers to what I was thinking about:

Likewise, she testified that the Senate Intelligence Committee staff had interviewed a CIA security officer about her covert status. The Committee subsequently reported the allegation (widely trumpeted by the noise machine) that Ms. Plame was not covert. But she added that later, the security officer was "virtually in tears" about the fact that the committee had twisted his statements. He wanted to be re-interviewed, something the committee did not grant him.

Deliberate falsification of evidence for a Congressional finding about intelligence matters is news, one would think. Yet the Post, with its finger on the pulse of every government agency, particularly the CIA, <2> did not deign to publish this charge made before a committee of Congress and under oath. Why?

Stuffy institutions like the Post are notoriously slow to admit they ever made a mistake. In this case, the "mistake" is an occasional series of unsigned editorials dating back two years, stating with stentorian authority that Ms. Plame was not covert, and therefore no crime was committed. The editorials also launched into some gratuitous personal attacks on Joseph Wilson, her husband. <3> Now that Ms. Plame's status has been attested to under oath, and buttressed by the CIA Director himself, one would think an apology would be in order - doubly so in so far as the "evidence" on which the Post editorial board rested its case has also been stated to have been manipulated. But there is no apology from the Post, just as there is no reporting of the testimony about the Senate Intelligence Committee's apparent manipulation of evidence. Again, why?

http://www.expose-the-war-profiteers.org/archive/media/2007-1/20070319-1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks Miss W. printing it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You are welcome, I thought it was a very good summary
it's easy to get lost in the Plame thing, it's so convoluted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. That asshole is looking for ratings
I'll put my next mortgage payment up to say that he's full of shit. He is one guy who if I ever see him in the street I will kick in the nuts. I really wish he'd try one of his moronic "man on the street" segments when I happen by that shithole they call a headquarters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like somebody's Sunday show ratings are in the toilet. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. he has none
he has to shock the fox viewers otherwise they would have to go on life support....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. The document that has Joe Wilson telling Saddam Hussein in 2001 ...
.... if he wants to kill or hurt any American (this was after the take over of
Kuwait) in his custody to, "Start w/ me and find out what happens." Joe
Wilson was our acting ambassador to Iraq @ the time .... Saddam let
all the Americans go ASAP.

Sean "Puffy w/ the his little biddy diddy" Hannity is just a tool .... a highly
paid tool but a tool .... the next original thought he gets will be his first one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. joe wilson craps guys like hammity for lunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Joe Wilson could throw Sean "Puffy" Hannity to the floor and .....
...laugh @ him. Sean is just a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Made up documents, of course. .
what else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. I remember back when he found the WMD's
it blew the lid off the truth that time as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. I might have
some concern if it weren't for the fact that Hannity/Faux Noise is not above making shit up and pushing it as fact. I am sure he will take some small kernel of half truth twist and stretch it far enough for his followers to wrap both brain cells around it as if it were absolute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. He has a solid new source-some guy on the internet.
He's also got lots of genuine unfaked pictures to back him up. Make sure you forward everything he says to everyone on your email list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC