Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

sorry dupe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:20 AM
Original message
sorry dupe
Edited on Fri Aug-10-07 09:18 AM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. They weren't prepared and mishandled it
Why do they keep assuming they can negotiate with Republicans? And the fear of a terrorist attack they would be blamed for in August is ridiculous. Why haven't they learned to plan these things in advance? From the same column:

"Several members from swing districts -- including Reps. Heath Shuler of North Carolina and Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania -- expressed openness to having Congress stay in town to fight if important constitutional issues were at stake.

But the moment passed. Even some very liberal Democrats worried about the political costs of blocking action before the summer recess. That Saturday night, the House sent the president a bill that, as a disgusted Rep. David Wu (D-Ore.) put it, with just a touch of exaggeration, "makes Alberto Gonzalez the sheriff, the judge and the jury."

...

Democrats concede they made an enormous tactical blunder by not dealing with the issue earlier, forcing the question to the fore in the days before the recess. One anxiety hovered over the debate: If a terrorist attack happened and Congress had not given Bush what he wanted, the Democrats would get blamed for a lack of vigilance."


Dems should have stuck with the argument that the current laws were sufficient and that the GOP was politicizing the issue to make their illegal activities appear legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Why are Du'ers still asking why the spineless don't have a spine??
They don't, and the WHY is irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. We're starting to act like ruminants -- chewing the same food multiple times before it turns to shit
How many times do we tell this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. They just need to do what is right and operate from space of integrity.
Instead,we see the countenancing of blatant BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC