Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Campaign Contributions from Credit Card Companies? Priceless" MotherJones

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:20 PM
Original message
"Campaign Contributions from Credit Card Companies? Priceless" MotherJones
Campaign Contributions from Credit Card Companies? Priceless
The presidential contenders have largely remained mum on the mounting consumer debt crisis. Are they afraid to cross their largest campaign donors?

Even so, today the credit card business remains virtually unregulated at the national level. Companies can charge—or change—interest rates at will. And while the companies may be regulated at the state level, two states, South Dakota and Delaware, have consumer protection laws so weak that credit card companies simply set up shop there and run their operations from these safe havens.

To make the situation worse, the new bankruptcy law that went into effect in 2005 makes it much harder to declare bankruptcy, and requires filers, including those with very modest incomes, to pay off much of their credit card debt regardless. Initiated in 2001, the law was vigorously opposed by consumer groups and unions, but championed by the president, whose largest campaign contributor had been the credit card giant MBNA (which subsequently merged with Bank of America). On an initial vote in 2001, it also won the support of 36 Senate Democrats, including current presidential candidates Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and John Edwards, while only Chris Dodd voted against it (as did Dennis Kucinich in the House).

* * * * * * * * * * *

Obama, who made a strong floor speech in opposition to the 2005 bankruptcy bill, nonetheless voted against a key amendment that would have put a cap of 30 percent on interest rates. Financial firms, according to Ken Silverstein's much-discussed Harper's article "Barack Obama Inc.," "constitute Obama's second biggest single bloc of donors." You'll find nary a word about the debt crisis on his campaign web site.

Hillary Clinton, who receives large sums of money from banks and investment companies, has waffled on the issue. In the The Two Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke, Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren recounts a 1998 meeting with Clinton, who was then First Lady. Clinton wanted to know more about credit cards and how they affected women and Warren, a leading critic of credit card company practices, gave her a short lecture over lunch, focusing on the drawbacks in an earlier version of the new bankruptcy legislation (which Bill Clinton and the White House staff were quietly supporting in hopes of wooing the banking industry). Warren writes that after their talk, Hillary promised to do what she could to stop the "awful bill." And, by the time the legislation passed Congress in 2000, Bill Clinton had changed his position and vetoed it. An aide later told Warren, "A couple of days after Mrs. Clinton met with you, we changed sides so fast that you could see skid marks in the hallways of the White House."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fact check
I am sorry I don't have time to do this right now myself, but I believe on this point:

Obama, who made a strong floor speech in opposition to the 2005 bankruptcy bill, nonetheless voted against a key amendment that would have put a cap of 30 percent on interest rates.


the reason would be because that particular amendment would ALSO have nullified MORE STRINGENT state standards.

Not all states have more stringent standards and it may be arguable whether a better national standard would be worth voting for in that course. But as usual, this issue is not as cut and dried as some want to make it. (Even if I am wrong in this case, please do consider this possibility when similar situations come up)

Can anyone verify this, and whether Illinois is one of the states with a more stringent standard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. When it comes to Credit Card interest, Illinois has no limit.
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/cc/20020320b.asp

According to the American Bankers Association, 21 states and the District of Columbia have interest-rate caps for credit cards. The other 29 states do not.
Alaska 17%
Colorado 21%
District of Columbia 24%
Florida 18%
Hawaii 24%
Indiana 21%
Kansas 14.45% to 18%
Kentucky 21%
Louisiana No limit for qualified in-state issuers. Limit for all other issuers is 18%.
Maryland 24%
Massachusetts 18%
Minnesota 18%
Mississippi 18% for cards with annual fees; 21% for cards without annual fees
Missouri 22%
North Carolina 18%
Ohio 18%
Oklahoma 21%
Tennessee 21%
Texas 14% to 22%
Washington 18%
West Virginia 18%
Wyoming 21%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "You'll find nary a word about the debt crisis on his [Obama's] campaign web site."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. thank you for posting this
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC