Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: No Bailout for Pinched Homeowners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:09 PM
Original message
Bush: No Bailout for Pinched Homeowners
Bush: No Bailout for Pinched Homeowners

By JEANNINE AVERSA, AP Economics Writer
August 9, 2007





President Bush said Thursday concern should be shown those who've lost their homes but it's not the federal government's job to bail them out.
"Obviously anybody who loses their home is somebody with whom we must show an enormous empathy," Bush said. Asked whether he would champion a government bailout, Bush responded: "If you mean direct grants to homeowners, the answer would be `No, I don't support that.'"

New home foreclosures have climbed to record highs. Homeowners with poor credit have been hardest hit as higher interest rates and weak home prices have made it impossible or difficult for them to keep up with their home loans.

In a wide-ranging news conference at the White House, the president also said that he's interested in exploring the possibility of providing tax relief to U.S. corporations. He has acknowledged that such a move would face challenges in the Democratic-controlled Congress, and he insisted it needed to be structured in a way as to not worsen the government's balance sheets.

.....

A Treasury Department study, released earlier this year, showed the federal corporate tax rate could be cut from 35 percent to 27 percent with the same amount of revenue collected if a number of corporate tax breaks were eliminated, thereby broadening the tax base.
However, such a move would likely trigger a firestorm of protest as various groups would seek to protect popular tax breaks such as the research and development credit.

"What we'd really be talking about is a simplification of a very complex tax code that might be able to lower rates," the president explained. "However, I would readily concede to you that this is a difficult issue."

Bush said that the reason there are tax preferences is because "there are powerful interests that have worked to get the preference in the code."

.....

Bush said that he does support financial institutions working with distressed homeowners. He also suggested that some people may not have fully understood the terms of their mortgages. The government, he said, can help out by educating prospective home buyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, direct bailouts are only for corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Exactly. We pay the taxes to bail out corporations but we can't use tax money to bail out ourselves
And some people believe there ISN'T a class war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. And airlines, you forgot that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. airlines are corporations, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, but $300 a few years ago was just the right way to "celebrate" your installation, wasn't it?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. If a bunch of corporate fuckbags hadn't decided to loan irresponsibly,
none of this would be happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. There are always going to be people who don't understand "Buyer Beware."
I agree that there should be some regulation in place, but I am having trouble feeling a lot of sympathy for people who don't read the terms of their contracts, or who bought too much house with too little down. But you can't regulate this problem away. There are always going to be shady people out there ready to separate you from your money. You have to run your own numbers and make sure they work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I can agree with that - I've argued in the past that
financial planning and budgeting etc should be required courses in all 4 years of high school, for the very reason that most people don't have a clue about this stuff and most parents don't teach it to their kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. Well, they're so dumb I guess they deserve it.
Edited on Fri Aug-10-07 03:25 PM by KaptBunnyPants
What a compassionate progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
57. Just a commonsensical one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. oh but bailing out the banks is okay ????!!!!!!!!!
Where's Neil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have a question....
mortgage companies are raising rates that then cause them to have to foreclose on those who can't afford the new interest rates, thus the mortgage companies stand to lose money, correct? Wouldn't it make more sense to lower the rates or can they not do that because the mortgage companies are paying higher interest rates? Still, foreclosures lose money so what's the difference? I admit I don't understand all of this crap.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. All This Stuff Is Arcane
But keep in mind a mortgage company or bank doesn't want to forclose on your home anymore than you want it to be foreclosed upon; especially if you owe more than what's it worth... It's a lose-lose for everybody but the speculator/vulture who gets a home at fire sale rates...

What a sad, sad mess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. The problem is people don't read their mortgages and notes when they sign them...
I deal with this stuff everyday. There are a lot of people who are just too stupid to breathe, let alone own a house.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Indeed
I agree completely: "There are a lot of people who are just too stupid to breathe, let alone own a house."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. HEre is a simple idea. Charge the Corporations a flat 20% tax on sales. Just like an income tax
for corporations instead of individuals. No exceptions or exemptions except that their sales could be reduced dollar for dollar by salaries paid to hourly (Non-Management) employees.

This would not be a sales tax that is passed on to consumers but a tax on sales paid by the corporations. Make it the alternative minimum tax on corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. remember what he said at a fund raiser
paraphrased: you are the have and the have mores, but I like to think of you as my base

us little folk ain't his base or his bank book so he doesn't give a flying fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. "With whom we must show an enormous empathy,"
How about we FEEL an enormous empathy there, George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Nice catch!
Very revealing - not that he exactly shrouds his true thoughts in clouds of mystery . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. One can't feel what one doesn't have and george doesn't have empathy for us little people.
He's no FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
44. "according to my handlers, that is"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can you say "Savings and Loan scandal"? I knew you could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
What a surprise! *'s base screw up the economy again, and the first thing out of his mouth is:

We need tax cuts! Screw the little guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Holy shit! Bush is actually telling the truth about something

Bush said that the reason there are tax preferences is because "there are powerful interests that have worked to get the preference in the code."

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. I caught that, too===one of his first ever truths told publicly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Tax relief for U.S. Corporations"???
With shelters, offshore accounts, all manner of other evasions, how many of them actually pay taxes NOW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. I will say it now! This is deliberate!!!!
Edited on Fri Aug-10-07 02:36 PM by TwoSparkles
I don't know what is going on, but what has happened to borrowers is BY DESIGN.

For years, bank regulations were relaxed and banks were permitted to give loans
to people who could not afford the payments, and who had no business buying these
expensive homes.

Banks were allowed to gin up "creative financing" like interest-only loans and
3-2-1 buy downs---that gave buyers the illusion that they could afford a $500,000
home on $60,000 household income. The banks knew the people were getting screwed.
The banks knew that once those loan payments moved out of interest-only status--and
people had to start paying on the principal--that the buyers would be in dire straights.

When we purchased our home, we were encouraged to spend more and borrow more. We were also
paying $1,400 per month on my student loan---in order to pay it off soon. The lender
actually told us to roll that loan balance on top of our mortgage to get rid of that high payment
and make us eligible to borrow money for more house. Can you believe that??? We were being
responsible, by aggressively paying the college debt. Ms Banker thought it was a good idea to put
the student loan in the mortgage, which would have been at a higher interest rate than the
college loan--and left us paying it off for 30 years!!!!

Malarky like this went on for a long, long time. I can only imagine the ginormous mountain
of bad financial information people rec'd from these bastards.

Now, when people can't pay---the government says "too bad". It's loose government regulation
that enabled these banks to give homeowners the rope that is now hanging them.

I'm sorry...but this does not happen by accident! This is designed to destroy us! Banks and
mortgage companies made a killing this past decade. NOw, they'll just obtain the foreclosed
homes and sell them to someone else.

Many in American walked into a trap---designed to obliterate the middle and upper-middle classes
in this country. This is not an accident.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I agree and where better to obliterate than the housing market
they'll always be those that can afford to buy, but the lower income earners will be shut out of the owner market forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. I think you're right
The house of cards was built with the loans they pushed - the bigger the better.
The loans were likely sold and resold to fund all kinds of venture capitalist transactions.
This short-term thinking was all about quick bucks for the large investors. Wealth was concentrated.
The middle and lower classes exist to feed the wealthy and Chimpy expressed this for those who had any doubt.
Just my opinion on the matter

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. How is It Deliberate?
Maybe shortsighted or greedy. But why would financial institutions willingly create conditions that would put them into bankrputcy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Because by the time they go bankrupt, they're filthy rich on
my money and yours. Then they simply open another bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Ribofunk, there's the age-old truth of capitalist economies... Banks are "Too Big To Fail"
they may go bankrupt but our tax dollars WILL be used to bail them out.

Because they are too big to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
59. The Issue Was Not a Bailout, But The Claim That
"what has happened to borrowers is BY DESIGN" and "...these things do not happen by accident."

The type of design was not specified, but since it was a blanket statement, it would seem to be a federal matter. I have a difficult time imagining that Greenspan and Bernanke have been plotting for millions of mortgage holders to get foreclosed on. It makes more sense to believe that they have been guilty of allowing the finance industry to operate unchecked and become greedy and reckless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. By design...
it's not like they don't have any practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. A systematic sucking of all the liquidity out of the middle and lower
classes. This is a classic Class war being waged against the elite agains the peasant classes. They win because they started with all the good cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. the "trap" is preying on the naive & uninformed. I can't afford a $400,00 fixer upper here in CT,
Edited on Fri Aug-10-07 06:39 PM by wordpix
but my realtor will be happy to help me find one. She benefits via the sales commission if I take the bait. Is that deliberately screwing me? No, but it isn't telling me the whole story about the subprime default mess and how it could impact the market. I had to read up on that myself. Thank you, DU!

After looking at many of these "gems in the rough" houses, I told her I'd wait for prices to come down or just stay put.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. This, from the Empathy pResident:
"You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —President George W. Bush, to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005



In an unrelated photo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Pinched homeowners" aren't "His base" big corporations are and lookee--free money for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. That last sentence kinda say it all, doesn't it?
screw the people. After all they're stupid, they deserve what they get. Cause after all,it isn't like anyone ever bailed you out. Right George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Similar to his saying, *take classes at community colleges* to jobless engineers.
Yeah, he's a real warm and fuzzy kind of war criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Two more recs....c'mon people! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. 1 more to go
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Thank you! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. from the man who's been bailed out of every failure in his life
except for EYE-raq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
48. good analysis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Wow, I'm really surprised and disappointed at Bush's view on this.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. Let's see: Savings & Loans bailout under his Poppy, and now this subprime mess
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. Oh yeah, SURE. Like I REALLY want business/investment advice from this guy.
Mr. THREE-BANKRUPTCIES-IN-A-ROW?

I wonder how many of 'em voted for him and his pie-in-the-sky promises, only to hear him tell them - "Sorry. Tough luck. Then's the breaks. Vote republi-CON. 9/11. Have a nice day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
40. kick! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
41. The POS just added insult to injury by using the word "empathy."
He doesn't know what that word means because he's incapable of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. Wow. I am floored.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. But he'd really like to thank them
for taking advantage of his low, low interest rates to buy up all those expensive houses and prop up his economy for several years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Wanna hearty laff?
Check out Carlyle investments in the RE sector 02 to 05. They're also poised to "privatize" infrastructure. All available monetary resources are earmarked to bail out the hedgers and murder folks a half a world away until they all are dead or agree to turn over control of their natural resources. What an "interesting" world we live in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
52. The handwriting has been on the wall for some time about this looming
crisis.


"Now, watch this drive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
53. "The Ownership Society"..."Compassionate Conservatism" What a jackass!
His mother instilled his sense of "fairness" in him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
54. Oh, fuck you, ChimpAss! Just. Fuck. You.
You're about as compassionate as a serial killer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
55. I know a 34 year old man with three children that just joined the Army
Why? He was losing his house and needed the bonus to keep a roof over the kids heads.

He says it's a temporary fix at best, but he didn't know what else to do.

I bet bush would dance with glee if he knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
56. From the most "bailed out" family in American history -- !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
58. I wonder what percentage of the tens of billions they dumped in to keep the money flowing around
it would take to buy down the rates of the homeowners who have had their ARMs explode on them. Not much, I bet.

Better yet, the banks themselves should lower the rates in the cases where that makes the difference in keeping your home or not.

Like that'll happen....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC