Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: Pentagon 'urgently assessing' security of Pakistan nukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:59 PM
Original message
Report: Pentagon 'urgently assessing' security of Pakistan nukes
The U.S. military is "urgently assessing" the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons in the event that President Pervez Musharraf is killed or deposed, three unidentified officials tell CNN.

The news network reports that these anonymous sources, identified as military officers and intelligence analysts, say Washington "is not certain who might start controlling nuclear launch codes and weapons if that shift in power were to happen."

CNN's Pentagon correspondent says the U.S. government knows where Pakistan's nuclear weapons are located, but military analysts are concerned about the Pakistani leader's ability to maintain long-term control over "commanders and senior officials in charge of the nuclear program."

CNN says it granted anonymity to its sources because of the sensitivity of the matters they were discussing.

USA TODAY has not confirmed this report.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/08/report-pentagon.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. More "All Fear, All the Time"
If the US would stay out of other countries business and not be a threat, there would not be a problem over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. CNN is about to discuss this issue.
Just caught the teaser surfing chans on the teevee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush Spiked Probe of Pakistan’s Dr. Strangelove, BBC reported in 2001
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Feb04/Palast0212.htm

On November 7, 2001, BBC Television's Newsnight and the Guardian of London reported that the Bush administration thwarted investigations of Dr. A.Q. Khan, known as the "father" of Pakistan's atomic bomb. This week, Khan confessed to selling atomic secrets to Libya, North Korea, and Iran.

The Bush Administration has expressed shock at disclosures that Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror, has been running a nuclear secrets bazaar. In fact, according to the British news teams' sources within US intelligence agencies, shortly after President Bush's inauguration, his National Security Agency (NSA) effectively stymied the probe of Khan Research Laboratories, the Pakistani agency in charge of the bomb project. CIA and other agents told BBC they could not investigate the spread of “Islamic Bombs” through Pakistan because funding appeared to originate in Saudi Arabia.

Greg Palast and David Pallister received a California State University Project Censored Award for this expose based on the story broadcast by Palast on BBC television's top current affairs program.

According to both sources and documents obtained by the BBC, the Bush Administration “spike” of the investigation of Dr. Khan’s Lab followed from a wider policy of protecting key Saudi Arabians including the Bin Laden family.

Noam Chomsky, who read the story on page one of the Times of India, has wondered, “Why wasn’t this all over US papers?”

To learn why, read the following excerpt from the 2003 edition of Palast’s book, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy:

The "Back-Off" Directive and the Islamic Bomb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um, why doesn't Pakistan just have elections? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They can but it would more than likely end up with Mush's head on a pike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, he would lose
but from what I understand the previous elected govts have been fairly moderate.

However, the fact the Mushie suddenly came to power in '99 makes me wonder if he was facilitated by the neocons' buddies (that's pure speculation BTW, I don't know the background to his rise to power).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think we would see something along the lines of what is happening in
Palestine with Fatah led by Abbas being supported by the West and Hamas the separatist Militant group. Lebanon, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Egypt mirror this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. They have elections scheduled for...
... sometimes in October. Whether they will actually happen... who knows...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. They Had Damned Well Better Be Doing that, Sir
That country is a but a whisker off from up for grabs in civil war: it is the most serious actual danger in the offing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like Mushie's about to be mushed
(and why are they telling us this?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC