Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They're openly discussing bringing back the draft on msnbc.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:20 PM
Original message
They're openly discussing bringing back the draft on msnbc.
Edited on Mon Aug-13-07 01:23 PM by Philosoraptor
I hate this shit. It was only on for a couple minutes with the accompanying headline, "Bringing back the Draft?" Just putting it out there for the consumers to chew on a bit while they graze.

It had the super attractive anchor lady interviewing another one of the countless retired military experts saying important sounding words written by the neo nazis, saying it out loud, following up that other disgusting general's report on bringing back the good ol' draft to help 'win' the war. (It worked out so well in Vietnam y'know).

You say you want a revolution? Bring back the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. They can openly go fuck themselves. On MSNBC.
I won't complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, not until they secure the border with Canada :)
Edited on Mon Aug-13-07 01:24 PM by HereSince1628
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They're working on that. And now that we have the new passports,
it will be a simple matter to track draftees who try to leave the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. But, you only need the passports to get back in, right?
Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. Canada doesn't welcome draft dodgers any longer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why don't we talk about cutting off the funding and bring the troops home.
So we draft unwitting children and send them into the war because we need more cannon fodder. Real wise choice America.

Sure you don't want your kid to go but are you so damn sure it won't be just like Vietnam where the rich could buy their kids way out of it?

This was an illegal war to begin with and to draft kids to fight is should be illegal too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. I believe they'll be some good come of this
After the chickenhawks clean up the mess from shitting their pants they might contact their DC representatives and tell them that ending our involvement in Iraq might be a pretty good idea NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good, that will FINNALY wake the youth up
by the way, as many of us have pointed out before, we already have one, its economic, but it is a draft...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I think they are already pretty well awake
Young people are among the most opposed to this war of all age groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. They are? Well then tell me this
why is is that most demonstrations (scratch that all demonstrations) I have gone to I can count those under thirty with the fingers of one hand?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Why? Because it's not 1968 anymore.
Nowadays most college-aged people have to work to be able to pay their way through school.

9 times out of 10 street protests don't work anyway. And don't cite the exceptions for me. I said 9 out of 10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yeah so? Tallking to youth
and I have talked to many.. opposition to the war? Are you kidding me? What time is Heroes on?

That is the attitude I have gotten

And the single issue that they have told me will wake them up is a national military draft. All of a sudden it will matter to them

By the way, I have talked to many kids.

The only thing that gets their lukewarm interest is the cost of college, becuse it affects them directly. The war... you kidding me? They are like most of the population, unless they have skin in the game, they don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I have talked to many of them too
And it's that very cost of college that forces them to work work work to pay for school. Their remaining time must be spent on studying. Few of them are convinced that holding up a pickett sign on the street corner will do any good, while the people in power just ride by in their limousines ignoring them and continuing to maintain the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. And alas they stay home
even on election day

True, nothing will change, they are correct

They are not willing to pay any price to force any change

Damn it... I know this is hard to understand but you want changes, you need to sacrifice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Or they get arrested for protesting and have that on their records..
as they try to enter the workforce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. That is also a very good point that I didn't think of
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. Yep
Hit that nail on the head. Nobody gives you breaks anymore. If you get in trouble with the law, you could also be expelled from a lot of places. I mean, everybody talks about "zero tolerence" but then don't expect to be taken at their word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
49. i understand your frustration, but i still disagree
Edited on Mon Aug-13-07 08:57 PM by NuttyFluffers
i'm around that age and i end up talking to that age group almost exclusively on just about a daily basis. it's almost impossible to find anyone who *likes* bush. also, they have a high vote turnout -- surprisingly so. but here's the kicker, they have no tolerance for getting their chain jerked around and "fighting pointlessly." so they often avoid topics of politics because they hate being bullied or shown to be behind in political events (and politics is an area that rapidly can escape someone's "authority of knowledge"). and lastly, they have next to no faith in "street theater" for social change, so if they have work or school to do those will get naturally higher priority. seriously, a lot of these canned, licensed, contained protests for the past few decades have really been terribly ineffective. strikes, boycotts, buy ins, etc, yes, that's effective; but dancing around w/ a million people only to be ignored in the a) media b) gov't c) local public soccer mom crowd atop of being harassed by the police just doesn't sound like a productive use of time or a sacrifice. it just seems like a tired plea for attention when no one cares anymore.

apathy to gov'ts relevance and watching it collapse by its own neglect has been more useful in getting people to wake up than all those huge protests before. seriously, if the biggest world protest (the global one against war in iraq) cannot get the people's attention here and change usa politicians' slow dive into hell, what makes anyone think that repeatedly doing the same losing thing is going to work. getting the heck out of america by getting your degree and heading for the border will definitely bring change. a nation suffering brain drain and economy based on indentured immigrants is bound for an explosion; why delay the inevitable, when you can set up the emergency escape hatches for your loved ones and others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Here...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/15/AR2006071500685.html

"In 2004, young people voted in the highest percentage they had since 1992, and in the third-highest percentage in the nine presidential elections since a constitutional amendment in 1971 lowered the voting age to 18."

and there's more:

"But in the 2004 presidential election, when the overall electorate showed a four-percentage-point increase in turnout from 2000, the turnout rate among people ages 18 to 24 increased by 11 points -- to 47 percent from 36 percent.

The spike was attributed, in part, to intense voter turnout efforts and a highly polarized election. But people who study this generation -- known as Generation Y, millennials and even DotNets -- say it is also disposed to be more politically active and passionate.

"The millennials are quite idealistic and concerned about a whole range of issues, compared to the Xers, which tend to be pessimistic and detached," said Peter Levine, director of the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement (CIRCLE) at the University of Maryland, and a member of Generation X."

and finally, the kicker:

"The Democratic advantage extends from 2004, when young people were the only age group Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) won in his presidential bid. The question for Democrats now is whether the youth advantage can turn into the margin of victory in close races that will decide control of Congress this November."

Got that? They were the only group, as a whole, to vote for Kerry over Bush.

Just because several kids you spoke to are more interested in video games than the war doesn't mean you get to paint the rest of them with a broad brush. They're far more liberal and open minded than any recent generation, mine included (I'm 29). If you want to alienate them, let a Democratically elected Congress institute the draft to send them off to die in Bush's third war. See how big the Green Party gets after that. Then we'll have Republican govt for 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. As a young person and a high school student I can tell you
that is fundamentally untrue. I helped start a club at school called "Students for Peace & Social Justice" after a mess of students attended the March on the Pentagon. I go to an extremely Conservative school. When I was tabling for a charity walk to raise money to build schools in Uganda I had things thrown at me, because "you shouldn't walk for countries other then America." When we put up over 300 fliars and a group nazis ripped them all down. Yet, at one of our meeting we had 30 people show up (which is really good for a high school club). So please don't tell me about waking the youth up. Besides, I though liberals were beyond playing with human lives in order to make political points. Apparently I am very wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Good for you!
As someone who's not too long out of high school, I know that having 30 people show up for anything on a voluntary basis is a good acocmplishment. I also went to a conservative high school... I kinda wish I was still in that environment just because I don't have anybody to argue with anymore :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. "I though liberals were beyond playing with human lives in order to make political points"
Yeah... Isn't endangering civillians in order to scare the population into working for your political goals what they call, um..... terrorism? And I know that they wouldn't be civillians anymore once they're drafted, but it's not like they joined the military of their own free will.

By the way, nice to see another high school age person around here. The only-america-matters attitude sucks, but it's good to see that even in such a right-wing school you could still find a good-sized group of people who actually cared about helping people. The closest thing my school has to the club you started is Amnesty International... I should join that next year, I really should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. I'm in Amnesty International, it's a great organization.
My school didn't have a pro-peace club either until someone started one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. So 2% of 30+ aged people show up at protests versus only 0.2% of those under 30.
That's still a pretty dismal number. Sounds like over 30's need to be awakened too.

If you're gonna have a draft, you should draft everybody, not just young people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. BUT, we also tend to be less active about it.
I am 26. Most of my friends (all of them as far as I know) oppose the war.

But they don't talk about it. They don't stand out on the street with signs, or march in protest.

There's no activism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Except the ones taking a dirt nap.
After being forced to go fight this fucked up war.

They won't be waking up, will they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good. Make those College Republicans SQUIRM....no deferments, this time round!!!
They'll be singing "Give peace a chance" and chanting "Hell, no, we won't go!" before ya know it!!!

This is a government document, not subject to copyright restrictions: http://www.sss.gov/viet.htm

    HOW THE DRAFT HAS CHANGED SINCE VIETNAM


    If a draft were held today, it would be dramatically different from the one held during the Vietnam War. A series of reforms during the latter part of the Vietnam conflict changed the way the draft operated to make it more fair and equitable. If a draft were held today, there would be fewer reasons to excuse a man from service.

    Before Congress made improvements to the draft in 1971, a man could qualify for a student deferment if he could show he was a full-time student making satisfactory progress toward a degree.


    Under the current draft law, a college student can have his induction postponed only until the end of the current semester. A senior can be postponed until the end of the academic year.

    If a draft were held today, local boards would better represent the communities they serve.


    The changes in the new draft law made in 1971 included the provision that membership on the boards was required to be as representative as possible of the racial and national origin of registrants in the area served by the board.

    A draft held today would use a lottery to determine the order of call.


    Before the lottery was implemented in the latter part of the Vietnam conflict, Local Boards called men classified 1-A, 18 1/2 through 25 years old, oldest first. This resulted in uncertainty for the potential draftees during the entire time they were within the draft-eligible age group. A draft held today would use a lottery system under which a man would spend only one year in first priority for the draft - either the calendar year he turned 20 or the year his deferment ended. Each year after that, he would be placed in a succeedingly lower priority group and his liability for the draft would lessen accordingly. In this way, he would be spared the uncertainty of waiting until his 26th birthday to be certain he would not be drafted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. I would never support a system in which the young Dick Cheney's
could have other priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Under the revised draft regs in place now, he woulda been wearing combat boots.
Those loopholes have been closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
44. What about me? Never lifted an agressive finger in my life and am starting Grad. School....
...should I go and be fodder for an illegal unjustifiable war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. I said this yesterday and I was laughed at
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Well, the ones who are laughing at you are laughing in the dark
There is certainly a risk involved in advocating a "share the burden" draft. But unless every American family unit shares that risk, there will NEVER be discussion --substantive discussion, not discussion amongst the small minority who are politically aware--about this war amongst the broader population.

It's only the poor, the disadvantaged, the kids with no place to live once they hit 18, who are being "drafted" now. They're being drafted by necessity, lured by promises of easy money and big paydays, and even at that, it's bottom of the barrel time. It just cannot continue.

Don't beat yourself up for being able to see that big picture, now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherGreenWorld Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. "You say you want a revolution? Bring back the draft."
Really? Do you really believe that the huge majority who reject the notion of a draft and national service (and, indeed, any direct participation in self-governance) would be willing to revolt? I doubt it. If that were true, we wouldn't be in the situation we're in. I think the damage to democracy, which means direct participation in our own self-governance, is so severe that the vast majority would merely succumb to a greater autocracy - "let George do it."

When democracy is essentially dead, we'll have no viable choice ... and it'll be a matter of complying or else. Whether "else" is internment, inability to work, emigration, or whatever is entirely going to be based on individual circumstances. We are not a "community" or a "common wealth" ... are about as divorced from having ANY ability to have a General Strike or engage in ANY kind of self-governance as any nation on earth right now. And it's only going to get worse, as far as I can see.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have other priorities than military service
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Start the draft. I'm all for it. The occupation would be over in a week.
Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. No it won't
Even if only one third of the young people who are drafted comply and are inducted, then you've got thousands of new bodies to fill the military with for more occupations and wars.

Sure, there would be more protests. I don't doubt that. But there would be enough young people who would go--either because they support the war, or because they have just been conditioned to respect authority no matter what--that the armed forces would have an ever bigger war machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Give or take 10 years and 50,000 dead. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. What kind of acid are you on? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
46. How? Why? It never has before.
As far as "the draft ended Viet Nam", it took 10 yrs and 50,000 dead military before the war ground down. Vietnam ended the draft, the draft didn't end Viet Nam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good for us
This type of dialog should scare the hell out of politicians still supporting this war. It also should bring out a whole new wave of anti-war voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Great! Keep the surge alive!
Chimpy's surge to the toilet of history, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. There will be a revolution, alright.
Drafts don't work. We, as a country, are no where near the unity necessary to put together an involuntary army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. My Bush-supporting mother said "They've got to do something about him (Bush)"
When I told her that Bush wanted to go to war against Iran and that they were talking about reinstating the draft.

I just about fell out of my chair.

I had expected her not to believe me.

Not only did she quickly agree that he wanted to go to war against Iran but she basically said that they had to stop Bush.

I know better than to hope that she's going to switch to the Dem Party - her cognitive dissonance is too strong.

This will be the last straw for a lot of the 30% who still say they support Bush. Just wait until their kids and grandkids start having to worry about being drafted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Damn, and I mean shit..
"You say you want a revolution? Bring back the draft." -

That may be the only way for this country to revolt, but can you imagine how people would be jailed or even executed for refusing service. The draft dodgers and card burners of the 60s and early 70s wouldnt compare to the amount of people refusing service. It would be revolutionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm going to paraphrase from
an ECONOMIST article, I was reading here last night. This is because I think they should go for the young Republicans first. The desire to pander to the 'conservative base' is partly to blame for the administrations near incompetence. Recruiting from the conservative 'counter establishment' -choosing people for their ideological purity rather than their competence or intelligence to work in the White House or to be in positions of authority in Iraq, has made some pretty weak links. They have some 150 Bush administration personnel hired from Pat Robinson University. Those are the pukes that believe in this war for oil. Start there. I think young Repuke kids, will look just as good with prosthetic arms, legs, and genitals as poor kids from the projects. They might be even brighter with closed head injuries. Maybe they'd wake up to the criminal intent of this administration and get on the correct side of this issue. PS(this isn't the real me it's the outrage talking)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. let's start with the anchor people, then we will see how quickly their tunes change. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Java
in a way the press has paid a price. I believe that many news-people have been fragged in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. real reporters I feel sorry for, the morons that parrot the party line
on tv need to get a taste of reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. Jack Cafferty's four o'clock question ....




"What would it take for the United States to consider reinstituting the draft?"


Link: http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/situation.room/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. And so it begins. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
38. I knew there was a reason I didn't want my 18YO DEM college student signing 1 year lease
it will suck big time if I have to somehow help get him down to his aunt's in Belize if they really do bring back the draft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
42. Deferments will be available to those who meet these conditions:
1. If they have "other priorities" (Cheney)

2. If their father can get them a cushy slot in the National Guard (*, Quayle)

3. If they have a pile in their ass. (Limbaugh)

4. If they are driving a Winnebago to support Mitt Romney's campaign. (My Five Chickenhawk Sons)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
43. Are they in favor? I think it's the quickest way to end the war,
personally. But, I am against it regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
47. Five nurses were trampled to death today as Young Republicans stampeded through
Edited on Mon Aug-13-07 08:04 PM by Marr
hospitals, desperately pleading for medical deferments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
53. The best way to strenghten an organization is to force a bunch of people
who don't want to be there to join.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
56. .............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC