Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH: The president takes responsibility for Feith's office "manipulating" Iraq intel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:22 PM
Original message
WH: The president takes responsibility for Feith's office "manipulating" Iraq intel
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 12:23 PM by sabra

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/09/iraq/main2452482.shtml

<snip>

Gimble responded that at issue was that the information supplied by Feith's office in briefings to the National Security Council and the office of Vice President Dick Cheney was "provided without caveats" that there were varying opinions on its reliability.

Gimble's report said Feith's office had made assertions "that were inconsistent with the consensus of the intelligence community."

Responding to the report, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said, "The president has long acknowledged that intelligence leading up to the war in the Iraq was inaccurate. And he has taken dramatic actions in order to revamp the intel community."

Asked if the president feels ill-served by subordinates who manipulated intelligence on which he based decisions and took the U.S. to war, Perino said the president takes responsibility and has taken steps to make sure that bad intelligence like this doesn't happen again, CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller reports.



:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other words, we'll shove it in a black hole for eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. not for eternity
just until they need it for IRAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mere lip service, if even that
"Taking responsibility" means making amends for the suffering you've caused.

It means sincere apologies to those who've been hurt with an iron-clad guarantee that nobody else will suffer the same. :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. This is the "Ronald Reagan" school of taking responsibility...
...just say "I take responsibility (for what some other person way down the line from me did)", and leave it at that, doing nothing. Nobody pays (except those whose deaths prompted the "apology").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. He takes responsibility that THEY did it...
nice cya. /snark

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmageddon Donating Member (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. "takes responsibility"? In that case, we accept your resignation George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. "taken steps to make sure that ... this doesn't happen again"?
Like what? Promoting the people who did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Yessss!
Give them a medal, too, don't forget!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktlyon Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. If he really wanted to take responsibility for attacking Iraq
the right thing to do would be to resign. Since he didn't feel it was necessary to be sure he really won the election in 2000, I don't think this will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. blah blah blah...just a "wasn't my fault" excuse
If the intelligence was manipulated, then how can I be blamed for trusting it?

If the intelligence was manipulated and I didn't know it, how can I be blamed?

So I didn't take the country to war for lies...and I didn't lie to Congress and the American people...because I was lied to...so it's not my fault.

I don't give a rat's ass how devious Cheney is...Bush wasn't in the dark on this...

Bush lied...and he knowingly lied

Bush wanted intelligence to back his already existing desire for war with Iraq...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Right! "Responsibility" without any accountability...
I can say I was responsible for a bank robbery if there were no consequences. Unfortunately, this was much worse than a bank robbery. Come to think of it, it was a bank robbery also. We still have $12 billion dollars that are missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Did you catch this? NPR: "Douglas Feith Responds to Criticism"
I only caught the very end -- Feith sounded pretty testy and defensive. The audio won't be avaiable until 4 pm ET, so you might want to catch it later today:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7309878
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. lying to Congress is a felony
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 12:50 PM by welshTerrier2
it's also an impeachable offense

we're all so concerned about whether "bush and cheney knew" about Plame. knowing the Intel about Iraq was a big old pack of lies is much more serious. the Plame case is just the tip of the "big lie" iceberg.

let's make sure this gets all the attention it deserves.

frankly, the conduct of the entire administration leading up to the IWR vote and the invasion was HIGH TREASON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:54 PM
Original message
This is the cornerstone of the whole house of lies...
This is where it all began. Impeachment must be back on the table if the President admits it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. He takes responsibility? Empty words IMO.
The verbal equivalent of sweeping dirt under the rug. Are we all just supposed to shrug our shoulders and move along because the President has said he takes responsibility? The Iraq invasion was the mother of all screw ups, we'll need more than empty words to set it right.

But, this article is a keeper. I intend to use it to show right wingnuts I come in contact with that Iraq intel was most definitely manipulated and St. George not only acknowledges as much but he takes responsibility for it. That ought to cause a few heads to explode in my little corner of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Congress should take bush* at his word and IMPEACH THE BASTARD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC