Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Alberto Gonzalez's coup d'etat"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:25 PM
Original message
"Alberto Gonzalez's coup d'etat"
http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2007/02/09/united_states_attorneys/


"...Again, the White House and the Justice Department have been exposed in a secretive attempt to expand executive power for partisan purposes. And again, their scheming is tainted with a nasty whiff of authoritarianism...

...Leading senators of both parties are disturbed by these incidents because U.S. attorneys -- the powerful officials appointed by the president to prosecute federal crimes and defend federal interests in each of the nation's judicial districts -- are supposed to be as nonpartisan as possible. Democrats mostly appoint Democrats and Republicans mostly appoint Republicans, but the U.S. attorneys are usually chosen with the advice and consent of the senators from their home states, and then confirmed by the full Senate, with a decent respect for skill and experience as well as political connections...."

SNIP

"...Carol Lam, the U.S. attorney in San Diego who successfully prosecuted the sensationally crooked Republican Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, was fired for no known reason while she is still pursuing important leads in that historic case. Cunningham is supposed to be cooperating, but if Bush replaces her with a partisan stooge, he may be able to keep his secrets. Bud Cummings, the respected U.S. attorney in Little Rock, Ark., was canned to make room for a Republican opposition research operative and Karl Rove acolyte named Timothy Griffin. Could that conceivably have anything to do with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential candidacy? Paul Charlton, the U.S. attorney in Arizona, was thrown out while investigating allegations of corruption against Republican Rep. Rick Renzi

And John McKay, the U.S. attorney in Seattle whose diligence has been praised by judges and lawyers of both parties, was simply ordered to quit last December, for no obvious reason. Although McKay's last evaluation by the Justice Department was excellent, the attorney general insists that all of these curious firings were due to "performance" issues..."

SNIP

"...The Senate Democrats should continue to probe the attorney general's little coup d'état and all of the resulting appointments..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. these guys are nothing but criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Does any one remember the year Kerry was running for President
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 04:03 PM by midnight
and he was tapped by the media, after a speech he gave,he said, that the guys in office are nothing but criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Does any one remember the year Kerry was running for President
and he was tapped by the media, after a speech he gave, he said, that the guys in office are nothing but criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. More here...
From March 10, 2004

CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN) -- Sen. John Kerry, all but officially the Democratic presidential nominee, called Republicans he is battling "crooked" Wednesday.

The comments, caught on tape, came after Kerry addressed the AFL-CIO by satellite. Union workers had been standing behind him. When the satellite feed ended, Kerry spoke briefly with a couple of them.

"Keep smiling," one man said to him.

Kerry responded, "Oh yeah, don't worry man. We're going to keep pounding, let me tell you -- we're just beginning to fight here. These guys are the most crooked, you know, lying group of people I've ever seen."

"It's scary," replied another worker.


debatebothsides
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. These guys are nothing but a bunch of crooks
it was priceless then and is still priceless......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes they should...
and they should do more than that. Those appointed in such a way should be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is due to "performance issues"!!!
Those U.S Attorneys who were canned refused to perform like trained seals.

Q: What's the difference between Alberto Gonzales and Roland Freisler?
A: Roland Freisler was a Nazi judge, and Alberto Gonzales is a...okay there is no difference!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It is not...
some guy said as much in his testimony before Congress just this week, after someone who was 'asked' to resign came forward to dispute the offical reason. Of course, that person then refused to say why they were canned, if not for performance issues...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gerrymandering the courts.
So many crimes, where do you start?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. There's something brewing with the border guards
and it's bubbling to the surface quickly. Not sure what's going on, but the Cons that are making such an issue of it are smelling something really rotten. I heard on Ed Schultz just a few minutes ago something about a piece in the El Paso (Times?) newspaper about some err...suspicious dealings between Gonzo and a private contractor.

Not sure what or exactly when, but I'm sensing something's going to be hitting the fan big soon. That is, unless there's a distraction somewhere in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. $470 million dollar Halliburton contract for "immigrant detention facilities"
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 03:11 PM by nashville_brook
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charlie-cray/prison-camps-bushcos-bi_b_28909.html

Prison camp construction is also another lucrative income stream for the usual cast of corporate cronies. E.g. last year the NYTimes reported that Halliburton would get paid $30 million to help expand the prison facilities at Guantanamo, work that was part of a $500 million contract announced in June 18, 2005.

So what's the other $470 million for?

One of the sick ironies in all this, is Halliburton's hypocrisy. The company has been criticized for using "slave labor"" to dig ditches in Australia, ordered to stop trafficking in human contractors in Iraq, and criticized in the U.S. for hiring undocumented workers to replace union contractors on post-Katrina reconstruction contracts.

Yet despite this well-known pattern of exploitation, the company announced in January that Immigration and Customs Enforcement had awarded it a 5-year $385 million contract to build immigrant "detention facilities" (prisons) for immigrants arrested on charges of entering the country illegally and to provide construction and logistics support services in the event of an "immigration emergency," a term vague enough to cause activists to suspect the worst -- that they are openly planning to build detention camps for political dissidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Not "unless ther's a distraction".
More like, hidden by the distraction in the Middle East.

Everybody's focused on Iraq and Iran, like a magician waving one hand to draw attention from the other, while here at home...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Recommended #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Senate Democrats should read bills before they vote for them and if they didn't vote for those
provisions in the Patriot Act, should have screamed bloody murder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. recommend#3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Leading senators of both parties are disturbed"

right.They seem to be disturbed over a lot of things these days and yet...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fascist Bastards
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. so true. "reducto ad Hitlerum" is yesterday's quaint mannerism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Amen, m'dear.
My outrage meter has been pegged at "11" for longer than I can remember. We're so far past the time for non-violent civil disobedience, it's appalling. We The People deserve what we're getting ... until we're willing to risk our blood, sweat, and tears - our very lives - to regain any semblance of democracy.

We're sitting back and watching Lady Liberty get raped by these perverts ... and doing almost nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Impeach! Imprison! Restore and Protect the Constitution of the United States of America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yes it *was* performance issues
They wouldn't perform felatio on the administration.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. Al Gonzo is THE White House yes man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC