So the thugs are just gonna interpret this the way they wished it were written?
Is this for real?
What is it about 'seriously flawed' that they don't get?
~snip~ WASHINGTON, Feb. 9 -- Senate Democrats and Republicans differed sharply today on whether Pentagon officials deliberately used faulty intelligence to justify the Bush administration’s war against Iraq.
The debate before the Senate Armed Services Committee was touched off by a report by the Pentagon inspector general’s office, which investigated
the Pentagon’s intelligence-gathering and found it seriously flawed, especially in its search for links between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein.Senator Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who heads the committee, called the report “a devastating condemnation of inappropriate activities” carried out by Douglas J. Feith, who was under secretary of defense for policy just before the invasion of Iraq early in 2003.
But Senator James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican on the committee, immediately disagreed, setting the stage for a series of partisan exchanges. “First of all, you can read the same report and come up with different conclusions, which is quite obvious and will be obvious,” Mr. Inhofe said, adding that the report cannot easily be interpreted as “a devastating condemnation,” as Mr. Levin asserted.http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/09/world/middleeast/09cnd-cong.html?ei=5094&en=bdc47717bcf9c077&hp=&ex=1171083600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: