Anti-Clinton bimbo crawls out of the sewer again...

[Archae]

Yup, another anti-Clinton bimbo with no credibility shows up again.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200709080003?f=h_latest

[whistle]

1. She is full of shiite

[Bluebear]

2. "The Clintons stole my manuscript!" - as if anyone wanted to read her "book"

[Bitwit1234]

3. I had to laugh about that one but

just think of all the people who believed her first attempt at attention. Now why in the world would either of the Clintons break into her house, or sanction anyone breaking into her house.

Most of the people didn't believe her in the first place why would they go along with this trash. Only Fox and rush.

[Archae]

5. WingNutDaily, The Pillhead and Faux believe her...

Then again, what do you expect from a bunch of right-wing shit spewers...

[Rock_Garden]

4. One thing you can always count on....

is that these kinds of people always go too far. So, in the end, they always get discredited.

[book_worm]

6. This is so 90's

Give it up already, FAUX news.

[Kingofalldems]

7. There's a Tweety story revolving around her

I don't remember, but it involved Pat Buchanan's brother. Anyone?

[Archae]

11. Willey named the guy who (supposedly) threatened her...

And PukeKKKanan's certifiable crazy brother attacked the guy's house.

[defendandprotect]

8. Well, this will only increase if Hillary Clinton is nominated -- meaningless . .. .

but it will go on and on -- replaying the Clinton "penis" impeachment ---

[Chipper Chat]

9. It's a Rove set-up.

What was actually "stolen" was Willey's personal copy of MY PET GOAT signed by Chucklenuts.

[sandnsea]

10. Eight more years of this shit

Truth or lies, nothing brings them out of the woodwork like the Clintons.

[The River]

12. Exactly

I wish they would just retire or march in place.(She's an "ok" Senator)
Clintons perceived baggage (true, false, real or imagined)
would turn the 08 election into a mud slinging personality contest.
The Repubs have no policy based chance in hell. All they have
is name calling and personality smears.
Guess who the biggest of all possible targets is?

[AlGore-08.com]

15. And the folks on the other side - - and far too many others - - will believe stuff like this

Thank God nothing important is happening in the world (like the climate system breaking down) so we can afford to loose this next election...

[Karmadillo]

16. Eight more years of this shit only if the Dems win. Whoever we nominate will be tormented

by lunatics and smear artists drummed up by the rightwing and their media abettors. If not Hillary, then Obama, and if not Obama, then Edwards and on and on and on it goes. If being subject to Republican smears is a bar to the nomination, we won't be able to nominate anyone (except the Republican nominee).

[sandnsea]

17. Edwards and Obama will fight for me

Hillary just gives lip service to the poor, if that. She won't promise universal health care in her first term. We don't gain anything from putting up with the smears against her. That's the difference.

[Karmadillo]

20. Nope. Hillary will fight even for you, no matter how much you

repeat the Ralph Nader mantra that there's no difference between Hillary and the Republicans.

[sandnsea]

22. She won't promise universal health care

in her first term. She has spoken out of both sides of her mouth on outsourcing, particularly to India. She won't promise a real change in foreign policy.

And where did I accuse her for being no different than Republicans?

[Karmadillo]

23. "We don't gain anything..."

If she's different from the Republicans, we will gain something.

[sandnsea]

24. We gain more with Edwards and Obama

Why don't you deal with what I said instead of manufactured smears.

[Karmadillo]

25. Smear?

Why don't you say what you mean so you won't have to backtrack later?

[sandnsea]

30. And another smear

Again, why don't you deal with the issues of change instead of attacking me.

[Karmadillo]

31. LOL

If you say we gain nothing from having Hillary in the White House, you should expect someone to point out you're sounding like Ralph Nader in 2000.

On Edit: took out some words and put others in

[fedupfisherman]

27. What?

What exactly?

[Karmadillo]

28. You can start with this link.

http://www.google.com/

[fedupfisherman]

29. ?????

[fedupfisherman]

18. Your exactly right

Nobody riles up the wingnuts quite like the Clintons

[TahitiNut]

13. "The Clenus ate my homework." (Where've I heard that before?)

:eyes:

[RaleighNCDUer]

14. And who was it here that told me in no uncertain terms that there

was NOTHING the insane right could come up with that Hillary has not already dealt with?

Sure, it's all bullshit, but that won't stop them from flinging it.

THIS is why Hillary will not win if nominated. There is a bottemless well of hatred out there - this "stolen manuscript" story will circulate long after Willey admits there was never a manuscript to begin with.

[cali]

19. bimbo? sewer?

Let me guess, you're male.

[hedgehog]

21. What if a Republican stole the manuscript hoping to get a head start

on the mud slinging?

[WinkyDink]

26. EIGHT more years? Try FOREVER. I keep hearing about Chappaquiddick (38 yrs ago).