Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US ‘prepares for failure’ in Iraq surge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:22 PM
Original message
US ‘prepares for failure’ in Iraq surge
From The Sunday Times
February 11, 2007

Sarah Baxter, Washington and Hamoudi Saffar, Baghdad

AS America’s troop surge in Baghdad gathers force, Robert Gates, the defence secretary, is already planning for failure. If the battle for security in Iraq does not succeed, he has told Congress he is prepared to move troops “out of harm’s way”.

Policy experts at the Pentagon are drawing up plans for a fresh change in strategy should it be required. “I would be irresponsible if I weren’t thinking about what the alternatives might be,” Gates said.

General David Petraeus, the “warrior scholar” and expert on counter-insurgency, took up command of his forces in Iraq yesterday as joint US-Iraqi security sweeps of Sunni and Shi’ite neighbourhoods got under way.

“The stakes are high,” Petraeus said at yesterday’s handover ceremony. “The way ahead will be hard but it is not hopeless. The mission is doable.”

<more>

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1364760.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember criticizing them for not planning for failure...
Edited on Sat Feb-10-07 07:25 PM by originalpckelly
I think that's only responsible. I differ with their plans, but at least they are considering it.

While I don't like their plans at all, I do have to say it seems they can't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gates may be planning for failure but I don't think bush is.
Shrub is fixated on Iran and leaving Iraq for the next president to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's damned hard to win,
if you don't even know what winning would look like.

What do we mean when we say we want victory in Iraq?

I have no clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. At this point, it
seems like "winning" would just be getting the violence down so people don't have to be afraid to go to the market or visit the hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. In that case, winning is easy
leave.

We are the focus of chaos in Iraq.

There is nothing we can do to lessen the death and destruction we have wrought, but our presence only prolongs the suffering.

Let us leave, and focus on bringing the culprits to justice.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. just check if they ordered another 20,000 body bags..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. That is good, plan for win, plan for failure, make all sorts of plans
Good for those who are figuring out contingency plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Duh...it's bout time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. They'd be fools if they didn't.
In a highly volatile and unpredictable situation where you could conceivably have some small nukes or dirty bombs detonating or a counter-invasion by a large army from Syria and/or Iran, you definitely need a Plan B to get out at a moment's notice. The fact that they haven't had an emergency exit plan in place for the past 4 years probably constitutes negligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC