Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VA Bill to Punish "Forced" Miscarriages ---------

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:25 PM
Original message
VA Bill to Punish "Forced" Miscarriages ---------
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 04:26 PM by Katherine Brengle
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/05/AR2007020501507.html

<snip>

RICHMOND, Feb. 5 -- The Virginia House of Delegates gave tentative approval Monday to a bill to make it a felony for a woman to cause her own miscarriage but rejected a proposal to give fertilized eggs and fetuses the "right to enjoyment of life."

With the legislative session nearing its midpoint, the House considered a half-dozen bills aimed at restricting abortion or cracking down on people who harm fetuses.

In a flurry of votes, the House gave preliminary approved to a bill that would require doctors to give women the option of viewing an ultrasound before an abortion. It also agreed to require doctors to give women information about how anesthesia can be provided to a fetus during the procedure.

Two bills that would make it a crime to force a miscarriage received preliminary approval in the House. Under one, a person other than the mother could be charged with involuntary manslaughter for causing a miscarriage. Under the other, a woman who causes her own miscarriage could be charged with a felony and face up to 10 years in prison. The legislation would not outlaw the morning-after pill.

</snip> More at the link posted up top.

This was posted in the Choice forum, but I think this kind of legislation needs more attention. Can you say "slippery slope" boys and girls?

For a considerably more disturbing read (lengthy but worthwhile) - and a glimpse into how one step can lead to another and another until things are violently out of hand - http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/09/magazine/09abortion.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5090&en=d855d7f018cc8c56&ex=1302235200&partner=rssuserland&emc=rssmost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Force a miscarriage?
Why haven't I heard from Planned Parenthood about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's not law yet, but I hadn't heard about it either
until I saw the thread in Choice.

By "forced" miscarriage I am assuming they mean nonmedically produced. But the slippery slope of course is that this could lead to any and all miscarriages being treated as potential crimes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Better not get the Flu,
drink too much alcohol or coffee, have a death in the family, lose your job, take other prescribed meds or OTC remedies, etc, etc, not to mention BIRTH CONTROL devices.

Fertilized eggs? Submit your tampons to the miscarriage police? GET REAL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The anti-choice lobby is incredibly sneaky
This is just another door
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Women of Virginia take note
Your fetus now has more rights than you do. If you voted Republican in the last state election this is the consequence. If you voted Democratic and your husband voted Republican, he has no respect for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Amen to that
Shit like this, and that lovely anti-gay screed last fall, is why my husband won't be applying to any law schools in VA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. How often does this happen??
Seems pretty unlikely that a woman would pass up getting a legal abortion only to throw herself down the stairs a week before the baby is due. Seems like these legislators are spending a lot of time coming up with laws that might affect one person every 5 years.

I don't have a problem with criminal charges being filed on someone who pushes a woman 9 months pregnant down the stairs and causing her to lose the baby.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't think you understand what "forced m/c" means...
There are a variety of ways in which to induce a miscarriage - not the least of which are drug/alcohol abuse (which personally I have a problem with during pregnancy), use of certain OTC and Rx meds that can cause it, herbal concoctions, etc.

There are two problems here:

1) Abortion is still legal for the most part in this country - all a "forced m/c" is is a nonmedically induced abortion.

2) This leaves way too much space for the government to further intrude into the uterus - first of all, any m/c could be treated as a potential crime scene. Second, it opens the door for antiabortion legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
40. Is your uterus a crime scene???
I bet there's a good campaign in that image. I don't think I've ever heard it termed that way before. Maybe that'd wake women up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
52. Well, you know how ditzy these women can be
"Oh my GOD!!! I forgot to get that abortion I was going to! It was right on my shopping list between 'go to the liquor store' and 'pick up the dry cleaning.' But I screwed up and spent the money on having my nails done instead of having my baby killed. And it's due next week! So I guess I'll just slam the door against my belly until I have a miscarriage!"

Three points must be made here:

Point One: everything above this line was sarcasm on my part.

Point Two: there are WAY too many people out there who believe women actually think that way!

and Point Three: not all of the people covered by Point Two are men.

Think of this law as a latter-day version of the 18th Amendment--the one that created Prohibition. It didn't work at all without the Volstead Act, which defined "intoxicating" as any beverage with more than one-half percent alcohol. In this case, the Virginia legislature is attempting to outlaw "self-induced miscarriages." It only takes an act of the Virginia legislature declaring an abortion to be a "self-induced miscarriage" to completely ban abortion in Virginia--and, given the composition of the current Supreme Court, there's about a 60-percent chance that such a law would be upheld.

The question is whether anyone in Virginia would have the moral courage to write a latter-day Blaine Act. This Act ended Prohibition by finding that beer with an alcohol content of no more than 3.2 percent was "nonintoxicating" and therefore allowed to be manufactured, transported and sold under the provisions of the 18th Amendment. (In case you're wondering how they came up with 3.2% as the proper amount of alcohol in beer...well, now you know.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Absurd
Will the VA Legislature be arresting the father too? If he approves of the forced miscarriage isn't that "conspiracy to force a miscarriage?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If you read the second link, in El Salvador
a woman who is found to have had an abortion can be imprisoned, the person(s) who performed the abortion can be imprisoned, AND anyone who is found to have "helped" her in any way can be imprisoned.

It's not far-fetched, with the way the political winds have been blowing in this country, to see laws like this showing up not too far down the road...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Right. They've got the forensic vagina inspectors in El Salvador.
Coming soon to a Red State near you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. Doctors too
. . . who failed to prevent the miscarriage.

And then the attorneys who represent them.

And then . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
51. Taking this rationale to an absurdist conclusion..
What with the attitude of imprisoning anyone who strays from the vast number of laws these people seem hell-bent on enacting, I wonder how many people will be left outside the prison system to administer to the majority who will be under lock and key .:think: :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. and just how long
before the "morning after" pill is deemed a "miscarriage inducer"?

afterall, the egg IS fertilized. but you are preventing it from attaching, therefore it is flushed out. it doesn't take much of a stretch to make a fertilized egg that can't attach, and is flushed out, the same us one that was, but detached and flushed out...

more than 50% of the population is female.

crap like this could easily be taken care of.

too bad.

so many things could be taken care if enough left leaning people cared enough to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. What about late periods? How late is late?
This is ridiculous. I can't imagine having a tubal pregnancy and waiting for the tube to rupture to operate. A lot of women with low thyroid are subfertile and may have a period that is a week or two late.

I once had an ovarian cyst rupture and i went to the emergency room. It was the most horrible pain I have ever had in my life, with the exception of labor pains that never went anywhere and I had a C-section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. 10 days
I was on the progestin only mini pill. I had very light periods; the main reason why my doctor proscribed it. Well, I got my period and 10 days later still had it, along with severE pains down on my left side. I won't go into detail, but the hospital I had to go to made me wait 24 hours just for a sonogram. My tube burst. "We don't do abortions here."

As the mother of a then 3 year old daughter, tell me, in the grand scheme of things, which is more important to you? Your life, your 3 year old child ("Mommy, are you going to DIE?"), or a 5 week old embryo? I can tell you from my own experience, it isn't the 5 week old embryo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. That used to be the norm all over the US before 1973
My next door neighbor bled to death while they were waiting around for evidence that the fetus had been expelled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. I know a lady who almost died during two miscarriages while they waited for the fetus to come out
she was a bleeder. One time a doctor helped knowing he was risking jail. She later had several children and now has many grandchildren and great-grandchildren none of whom would probably would not exist if not for that doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sure ...
....and smoking increases the risk for miscarriage ... certain lifestyle and work choices may increase the likelihood of miscarriage.

Let's lock all pregnant women up ... Do not forget some of these things can be done prior to a woman becoming pregnant ... OK, OK, better solution : lets legislate all the choices out of a woman, in her reproductive years, life.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's exactly what they want to do.
Antichoice advocates use abortion and related issues to push a much larger agenda focused on controlling women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I know
It really is solely about undermining the freedom and autonomy of women ... period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thanks, KB
For bringing this out into GD.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. NP, after seeing your post in Choice, I was surprised not to have seen it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. So... if a woman is in a stressful job, will her employer be
required to fire her?

What if she has odd periods and continues to smoke or drink for a couple of months, not knowing she is pregnant, and has a miscarriage.

This is fucking ridiculous!!

Thanks for posting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Right?
There are so many things wrong with this I can't even THINK of them all yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is so ridiculous.
And unenforceable in reality. Why are lawmakers such nitwits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. I live in Virginia,
yet somehow I missed this.

Hopefully this bill will be treated with the same outrage and controversy as the bill in 2005 that would have made it mandatory to report a miscarriage to local police within 12 hours. If I remember correctly the senator who proposed that bill withdrew it because of the reaction generated by the blogosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. One can only hope. It's f*ed up that it ever made it this far. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Is anyone surprised?
How long is it going to take before that nonsense about "we don't want to prosecute women who have abortions- only doctors" goes out the window?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Check out the 2nd link from the OP --
a glimpse of the possible future...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Right. The forensic vagina inspectors of El Salvador. I read that article the first time around.
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 06:20 PM by impeachdubya
Seriously frightening. (Thanks, Reagan!) That's what happens when you let the church and a bunch of busybody control freaks convinced that they're doing "the right thing" run other people's personal lives.

Hopefully, our party will take a solid, across-the-board stand for the rights of people to make their own choices, for consenting adults to be left the hell alone about how they entertain themselves in and out of their bedrooms, for marriage equality, and absolutely, unapologetically for women to have control over their own reproductive systems.

Well past time for the Bill of Rights (particularly #1 and #4) to be reinstated, for us to get rid of these crazy ideas about how the government knows better than individuals what they should be able to do with their own bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. "...would not outlaw the morning after pill". And if you believe that...
...I've got some tropical ocean front property near Denver to sell you.

It may not technically outlaw it, you can be certain it'll be used to choke off its use little by little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. And the HLA plank in the Republican platform wouldn't just outlaw the Morning after pill
it would outlaw ALL oral contraceptives. Once they declare, by fiat, a fertilized egg as a "human being" with 14th amendment rights, fertility treatments would be outlawed, pill taking women would be hauled off to jail with pot smoking cancer grannies for "possession", and having an IUD would get you a concealed murder weapon charge.

Not so farfetched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
33. quick self-kick bc people need to know this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. Governor Kaine better have his veto pen ready
The VA legislature is controlled by the GOP last time I checked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Not even remotely surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
36. Does this have anything to do with the VA woman who shot herself to kill her full-term fetus?
This sounds like another piece-o-shit reactionary law designed mainly just to get re-election votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
37. WTF is wrong w/ these 'people'
Where are they sniffin' + WHY?????/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. 10 years in prison?
So, let me get this stratight. An 18 year old causes her own miscarriage because she feels she is too you and irresponsible to raise a child. So, now she gets llocked up behind bars for 10 of her most fertile reproductive years? The ten years when she is supposed to be meeting her husband and starting a family? How many babies could she have been making in those years? What kind of crazy, backwards anti-life shit is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
39. How utterly horrendously AWFUL:
At the age of twenty, I began to hemorrhage.

I had just found out that afternoon that I was six to seven weeks pregnant.

It was three o'clock in the morning. I was taken by police car (I called them - they were free, unlike an ambulance) to a nearby hospital, where the ER doctor would not admit me because at that time in Illinois abortion was illegal and he assumed I had caused the miscarriage. (If he had admitted me, and someone found out and could prove it was an abortion,the hospital could lose its license.) This young doctor sent me home to die.

Next day a neighbor stopped by and visited me. I was very out of it, having lost so much blood I was somewhat blue looking.

She got me into her hospital immediately.

Once you have all these rules and regulations, medicine starts to operate under a culture of fear, rather than a culture of scientific knowledge.

Having been raised Catholic, I had been adamantly opposed to abortion, but this one experience changed me for good.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. What year was this?
I grew up in Illinois and lost a neighbor to a similar situation in 1958.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. It happened in February 1972 -hardly the dark ages
The irony was, if I had wanted an abortion, my mother (who hated my first husband, despite his being this total sweetie of a man) would have gladly put me on a plane to NYC and paid for a legal abortion, and I would have had top notch treatment there...

Sorry about your neighbor. I had no idea how crummy things get when doctors aren't allowed to do medicine but must do public policy instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Any time before 1973 was the dark ages
--at least for women. My miscarriages were after 1973, so I'm part of that significant downtick in maternal deaths post 1973. People tend not to notice it so much, because the drop in deaths from complications of abortion was so much larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
41. Better start building more prisons.
Asshats. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
42. Ugh, this is so ridiculous
This is one of those "precedent-setting bills".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
43. This is in anticipation of making abortion illegal...
they're getting ahead of the game. Forced miscarriages were quite common before abortion became widely safe and legal..:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dracos Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
46. Why even have such a law ?
why would a woman want to cause her own miscarriage it doesn't make sense if she wanted to abort the pregnancy there are several legal ways to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
48. Does VA provide free medical care to low income pregant women?
Do they have plenty of women's shelters, properly enforce restraining orders, and throw the book at males who beat their pregnant girlfriends and wives. The leading cause of death in pregnant women is murder and physical abuse increases the chance of miscarriage. What about lead, merucry and other toxins in our air, water, and food that are even more damaging to a fetus than to adults. What has VA done about these?

You see I would actually believe these pro-pregnancy people really gave a d#%n about the resulting babies if they did something, ANYTHING to help women and children be safe and healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
49. Goddamn!
There are no words...I am just way too angry right now...:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
50. this makes me ill. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
55. Punish Forced Miscarriages
The incident that has caused the Virginia Legislature to look at such law occurred about a year ago in the Tidewater area of Virginia. A young woman, late in her third trimester (about 2 weeks away from deliver) intentionally shot herself in the abdomen, killing the fetus. The local DA tried to prosecute under existing Virginia law but none of the existing statutes applied to her actions. It is my understanding that Planned Parenthood officials were consulted on the wording of this law so as to not interfere with legal abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC